Album Rating: 5.0
Can't tell if you are being serious or not
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off
Kendrick wanted to be king of both coats by wanting his most grand album to be jazz rappy, the sound most associated with the East Coast
And who gives a fuck let an artist do whatever the hell they feel like
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
i think its less that and more he just liked the sounds of guys like flylo thundercat kamasi but i duno have to ask him
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
A liitle of both actually...
IMO TPaB's biggest flaw is that it doesn't sound of its time... that dont necessarily need be a bad thing, but i feel that musically it's the opposite of innovative as it is a sound that's roughly 20 years old by now.
At least this sounds contemporary
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
That was beautiful *wipes tear from my eye*
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
"IMO TPaB's biggest flaw is that it doesn't sound of its time... that dont necessarily need be a bad thing, but i feel that musically it's the opposite of innovative as it is a sound that's roughly 20 years old by now."
Disagree hard with pretty much every aspect of this comment.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Its also boring and obnoxious tbh
|
| |
true
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
That's an oxymoron tbh
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
"TPaB is a step backwards not only in his career but a 20-year one in hiphop history, shit's outdated af. Who gives a shit about the themes or the story when stuff's a boring snoozefest.
Inb4 racist.
This is the album he NEEDED to make."
I always believed that opinions couldn't be wrong... until now.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
i know what he means in that jazzy hip hop has been done in the past, atcq etc, but i dont think the modern take on it is old (well at the time of tpabs release anyway), its a sound that has evolved the past 5-10 years
tpab was not unique in using that modern sound either though. you see a lot of people freaking out like it was and brand new innovative sound. it's not.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
"IMO TPaB's biggest flaw is that it doesn't sound of its time... that dont necessarily need be a bad thing, but i feel that musically it's the opposite of innovative as it is a sound that's roughly 20 years old by now."
Disagree hard with pretty much every aspect of this comment. [2]
Its not like he reinvented jazz rap, but he did a lot with that hadn't been done before in my experience, and he certainly put his own spin on it. Also, are you against all revival movements as lacking in innovation then rabid? Just curious.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
http://www.sputnikmusic.com/forums/image.php?u=71831&dateline=1493318041
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off
DNA. is life changing when you hear it in a car with nice ass bass
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
2 to a 3.5 wowie
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
it's a solid album but i only find myself coming back to a few of the tracks here. DNA is great.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
This album basses so fucking hard. I have 2 ten inch subs running at 500w and this entire albums bumps so fucking much that I have to flatten the bass to almost 0 and it still vibrates my mirrors to the point where everything behind me is an absolute blur.
Another stupidly bass heavy record is Luminiferous by High On Fire
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
wow who gives a flying fuck about what "generation" the album sounds like it was released in. like what a petty thing to judge an album that good on
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I feel like I shouldn't be humming YAH and LOYALTY all goddamned day long, but I do.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off
This is a grower, surprisingly, given how immediate it is. There really is a lot to unpack out of the lyrics that only come out many listens in
|
| |
|
|
