KISS
Monster


2.0
poor

Review

by JViney EMERITUS
October 24th, 2012 | 54 replies


Release Date: 2012 | Tracklist

Review Summary: ...of death.

Part-time band and full-time business, Kiss have hardly set the world alight musically for something approaching 367 years. Known more for their penchant for hawking acres of tacky merch, the New Yorkers follow up 2009’s Sonic Boom (name a song from that record without looking it up) with another album about girls, low-down street life and other passé things like that.

No doubt Gene Simmons, still heavily competing for biggest arsehole on the planet, will tell you he doesn’t care what we all think; he’s got money, bitches and bling. Is that still something to aspire to, by the way? Besides, it’s hard to take any advice from the man responsible for the Freddy Krueger-meets-Nucky Thompson-meets-drunken sex pest turn he pulled for his cover of “Firestarter”.

So what do we have here exactly? For better or worse it follows the Kiss ethos; wanton superficiality, lyrics so broad they might fall off the edge of the Earth and a complete lack of consideration for modern trends and tastes. The latter is no more evident than in “Freak”, in which they qualify the titular character as having “streaks in my hair.” If that’s what passes for edgy in Kiss world, then they still have a lot to learn.

What IS missing here is authenticity. As (bad) luck would have it, those other bearers of the Just F*cking Give It Up crown, the Rolling Stones, released “Doom & Gloom” to a non-plussed world. What stood out most from the Stones’ new single is the notion that, Jagger aside, you just don’t believe the other Stones even rehearsed together nor recorded their parts. It seems nothing more than a session exercise with Jagger’s old man face gurning over the top of it. The same accusation can be levelled at Monster. Can you even imagine Simmons, Stanley and whoever they’ve roped in this time getting together in a cramped room and thrashing out some new songs? Me neither. Although the album barely brings its head above the water-line marked “passable”, it’s still too slick, too unified and too perfectly structured to convince you that apart from the vocals of Stanley and Simmons, the rest of the album is nothing more than a hodge-podge of contributions from various pony-tailed musos from somewhere sunny.

Monster has no justification for its existence. It won’t draw in new fans and the old fans won’t care to hear any of these tracks shunted into a live set that even a deaf mute could predict accurately. If it’s a money making exercise then they’ve obviously taken their finger off the pulse of present day record sales. What then? Pensioner’s ennui? Boredom? More money than sense? Sadly, it’s all of this and more. Ironically, it’s the band themselves who have the last and most concise word; forget the modern age, let’s all just go “Back To The Stone Age.”



Recent reviews by this author
Morrissey World Peace Is None of Your BusinessArchie Bronson Outfit Wild Crush
Manic Street Preachers FuturologySweet Apple The Golden Age of Glitter
Parquet Courts Sunbathing AnimalSKATERS Manhattan
user ratings (301)
2.6
average
other reviews of this album
Muse1748 (3)
Just about what you'd expect from Kiss...

Pedro B. (2.5)
Another KISS album - no more, and no less....

NickGrouwen (2)
I'M SHOUTING MERCY I'M SHOUTING MERCY...



Comments:Add a Comment 
JViney
Emeritus
October 24th 2012


322 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I've had a few to drink, can't be bothered going through the actual songs because they're so forgettable. Thought I'd have a moan instead. Enjoy?

zaruyache
October 24th 2012


27362 Comments


You just don't understand rock 'n' roll, maaaaaan!

zxlkho
October 24th 2012


3493 Comments


why does this band exist

JViney
Emeritus
October 24th 2012


322 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Ending
October 24th 2012


2185 Comments


I think that it's easy to see why they existed, but the question is why do they still exist.

Ending
October 24th 2012


2185 Comments


That answer is actually a very good one.

tommygun
October 24th 2012


27108 Comments


Awful band nice review. Haven't heard this and won't bother. Why the fuck are KISS still a thing?

Ire
October 24th 2012


41944 Comments


$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


tehe

AliW1993
October 24th 2012


7511 Comments


As ever, awesome review/summary.

klap
Emeritus
October 24th 2012


12409 Comments


best review

manifestum
October 24th 2012


67 Comments


Phew. For a moment there I thought KISS was going to disappear forever.

JAXETA
October 24th 2012


805 Comments


ZINGER

TheSpirit
Emeritus
October 25th 2012


30304 Comments


awesome awesome review

ForeignFilm
October 25th 2012


129 Comments


To everyone asking why Kiss is still a thing.....one word: Money.

thekingofqueen
October 25th 2012


16 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

kiss blows.

JAXETA
October 25th 2012


805 Comments


what's money?

North0House2
October 25th 2012


6153 Comments


They're still alive?

JohnXDoesn't
October 25th 2012


1395 Comments


read this in a soundoff someone wrote:

"KISS have attempted to recreate their original image and sound from their heyday so everyone can party like it's the 80's again

maybe that 8 was supposed to be a 7 because any Kiss "heyday" ended with Alive II in '77

menawati
October 26th 2012


16715 Comments


"a complete lack of consideration for modern trends and tastes"

That's sometimes a good thing.

But not in Kiss's case.
Dont want to waste the time listening but I'd guess a 2 rating is quite generous.


StrizzMatik
October 26th 2012


4155 Comments


At least the Stones song is good



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy