Album Rating: 4.5

by the way, synonyms do not necessarily have the same exact connotations

but I'm starting to think this argument is lost on you and you just wanted to have your time in the

spotlight and look cool

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

I give Cities a 5 based on Sputnik's description for each rating, where a 5 is labeled as "classic." Cities is an album that for me, holds immeasurable amounts of sentimental and personal value and one that despite its minor flaws, I can never get tired of listening to. That's what a 5 means to me, anyway.

Album Rating: 2.0

I consider 'Hello Alone' to be a flaw. Just like I think 'Untitled' is a flaw on TDAGARIM

Album Rating: 4.5

obv it's subjective at the core

but there's always some metric you use. whether or not you can figure out what that is is a completely different story.



For me, a 5 is sort of what you said, something I can't really get tired of listening to, and the quality of the songs are superb to me. In that second part some of Cities falters a bit, but it's the first part where Everything in Transit really stumbles. I can't just put up that album at any time, so I can't call it classic, just really awesome



Oh Kris, here's something else I thought of:

Ever see a girl with no acne, well-proportioned face, nice body, good laugh, etc? You think of anything about her and you can't come up with a fault? That's "flawless." But have you ever dated a girl with something that comes off as a flaw (weird laugh or strange interests, etc.) and you just found her all the more endearing for it? Well you might very well call her "perfect."

I suppose it's a difference of subjectivity vs objectivity.

But like I said, someone who posts "roasted nigga" without actually thinking through the other side's argument... I surely can't expect this person to understand anything relating to subtlety?

So let me put it in your terms:

"Roasted nigga"

i dont even know what you were arguing about, i just saw that phrase and wanted to be a cunt so yea tl;dr

Album Rating: 4.5

dammit I knew it

w/e some idiot agreed with you so I'll just pretend like it was directed at him

Album Rating: 2.0

havey you like anberlin :O

Album Rating: 4.5

cuz they r00l

Album Rating: 2.0

yeah :/



it's a low 3 though don't worry

Album Rating: 2.0

I've always liked these guys. Anywho, mine is a high 3 actually.



You're fine havey bro.

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

it should be a high 4.5 my dudes

i really like cities and new surrender idk bout this tho should i dl it

Album Rating: 4.5

Chan is in the same boat and didn't like this

Idk 70% chance of you 4ing it, that's my guess

hmm 70% i like dem odds

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

do it up man, it might surprise you

Album Rating: 4.5

yeah

too bad I made those odds up

regardless if you like Cities and NS I'm pretty sure you'd 3.5-4 this at least. seems fanboys 4.5+ this and people who like Anberlin 3.5-4 this and everyone else 3s or worse this

Album Rating: 2.0

3 isn't a bad rating



I like this album

Album Rating: 4.5

it's not, didn't mean to imply it is

just meant to say if you're not an Anberlin fan, then your rating is generally capped at 3 which is good esp for a band you don't really like

Album Rating: 4.0

Not sure whether i commented this before. i really am curious about this album seeing everybody acclaiming it so much. in the other hand, to what point can a band make it better each time they try to deliver?

Album Rating: 4.5

Wow.. that's all I can say.



For a band to be able to make an album that is so fresh, catchy and beautiful is absolutely astounding.



I wasn't entirely impressed with the last album but this more than makes up for it. There's not a bad song on the CD (including bonus tracks!)



I've listened to it probably 15 times through and I just can't get enough.



LOVE the lyrics, vocals and pace of this album.



Two words... GET IT!!