Coheed and Cambria From Fear Through the Eyes of Madness
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Storm In A Teacup
February 14th 2006


45694 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Thanks, sandwith.

Pyramidman
February 14th 2006


1340 Comments


Great reaview, ive been wondering exactly what the story was

Now, not to start anything, but i just cant seem to get really into welcome home, its a good song, but it doesnt seem as epic or amazing (minus the solo) as everyone makes it seem.
but what ever, imo second stage is the best

i greater than three Coheed


Storm In A Teacup
February 14th 2006


45694 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Man, I didn't even talk about the story barely at all, and what I said was vague, as I didn't really think it mattered to the review.

NEDM
February 14th 2006


1113 Comments


Let this thread die! I'm tired of seeing it on the homepage.

Storm In A Teacup
February 14th 2006


45694 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

:mad: Not until it reaches 100 comments!!!

I have yet to have a review with that number. :upset:

Thor, did you anyone send you a copy of this yet?

Apathy
February 14th 2006


645 Comments


I haven't even had a review that's reached, like, 30 yet. Which really sucks, if you think about it.

/helps reach 100

DesolationRow
February 14th 2006


833 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

This is at least better than IKSSE:3, only by a little, though.

Storm In A Teacup
February 15th 2006


45694 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

In Keeping Secrets for me was a little too repeptitive for me, but it's still great.This Message Edited On 02.15.06

ktstein
February 15th 2006


459 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Kripes, you must really like these guys...haha! I love the homepage comment.



#96, BTW

DesolationRow
February 15th 2006


833 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I think Backend of Forever alone is better than the middle portion of the album (5-11).



Still, the Willing Wells own soo hard.

Storm In A Teacup
February 15th 2006


45694 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Especially the second of the Willing Wells.

Kstein, um, of course I like them, have you not seen my avatar? :D

DesolationRow
February 15th 2006


833 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I'm not a big fan of Willing Well I, but II, III and IV are awesome.

Storm In A Teacup
February 16th 2006


45694 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

I think that Willing Well III is perhaps the weakest, but it's still a superb song.

*Comment # 100!!!

Apathy
February 16th 2006


645 Comments


lawl

pulseczar
February 16th 2006


2385 Comments


The amount of pointless spam comments in this review is quite astounding.

usaidol
February 17th 2006


12 Comments


a better and less pretentious name for this band would be "guilty pleasure"

this is probably going to show my age,but this is no different than all the sword and sorcery art rock of the 70s;bands like styx,yes,rush(the dude is the second coming of geddy lee).yet more interesting than these groups is the way the music is smolded because of the obvious punk elements,ok emo(i hate that term so much).

I got familiar with c and c with,of course,that song favor house,which is one of the greatest songs ever.Nice concise no b.s.,and a very conventional love song,it would be nice if they stop the concepts and make a whole album of that.

This album is just out there,these guys are outstanding musicians.personally I dont give a crap about this saga,its like theyre making a rock musical version of the lion the witch and the wardrobe.

if there are some keepers,its the suffering,burning star 4,and the great erica song,now that should be the single.

anyway,the kids understand,and they got their moneys worth,besides I bought rush too,and theres no shame in that.

Pyramidman
February 17th 2006


1340 Comments


way to go with 100 comments kripes
(high five)

Storm In A Teacup
February 17th 2006


45694 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

[quote=ignorance is not bliss]this is probably going to show my age,but this is no different than all the sword and sorcery art rock of the 70s;bands like styx,yes,rush(the dude is the second coming of geddy lee).yet more interesting than these groups is the way the music is smolded because of the obvious punk elements,ok emo(i hate that term so much).[/quote]Umm, first off, Co & Ca are nothing like the pre-mentioned bands. If they were than I'd be all over that (wait, I am all over Yes), but Yes, and Rush are both progressive bands. Co & Ca is more or less pop-rock with influences of pop-punk, rock, and post-hardcore(SSTB). The use of emo is wrong too. I'll guarntee you that any mainstream band people call emo are not actually emo.This Message Edited On 02.17.06

usaidol
February 20th 2006


12 Comments


hello kripes...

c and c are probabaly more prog than yes or rush ever were.

especially yes,because they only went as far as one double album for a concept,when these boys are using 5.

total agreement with poppunk.thats probably the best element,ask cheap trick.

and they're emo,and thats not a declaration,this sound is so pervasive these days.yellowcard,brand new,thursday.these guys just take it to another level.they probably played dungeons and dragons a lot more.



204409
Emeritus
February 20th 2006


3998 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I'm sorry but this album underperforms. I still haven't even bothered naming the tracks. I just listen from time to time and then switch back to their two previous LPs.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy