Album Rating: 4.0

review reads like a dumb nerdrage reaction to all the OTT fanboyism. both are equally bad.

2nd listen and it got a little better. im getting into this.

Album Rating: 2.5

steventon, how does it read like a dumb nerdrage?

Album Rating: 4.0

Well a negative review after a bunch of people overating it is always going to look like a kneejerk reaction. First paragraph is just firing insults at the people who like the band. Second paragraph is you saying you've never liked the band. Third paragraph actually has some insight, though not much. The clean vocals are featured on 1/3 of the album, which IMO is fine for them. Fourth paragraph is again just slating the band with the only insight being picking out one line of lyrics from one song, which isn't even that out of place here. Review is only four paragraphs long really and theres like 4 sentences of actual talk about the music on the album, looks like you were really reaching for points to make.



I mean if you don't dig something, that's cool bro. We cant all dig the same shit. But it reads like you never liked the band, but listening to the album and gave a review just to piss on people's parade.



(fwiw I thought it was good but def not a 5/5)

Album Rating: 2.5

i see your points. "Second paragraph is you saying you've never liked the band." : when did I say I never liked ETID in the second paragraph? Pretty sure I stated I've enjoyed every ETID record.

Album Rating: 4.0

my bad, i read that as "theres never been an album i could get behind"

Album Rating: 2.5

ahhhhh. well, thanks for the insight, man! i'm new here and i just wanted to get an opinion out there to get started. i'll remember this next time i find something i want to review.

Album Rating: 4.0

oh shit someone acting humble on the internet

Album Rating: 5.0

FROM THE CRADLE TO THE GRAVE IT HAS BEEN A WALK OF SHAME!

Album Rating: 5.0

I don't mind a neg review but it's kinda hard to take seriously considering you joined today...

Album Rating: 5.0

Review blows. I don't even know where to start.



That's everyone's sentence. Just the second half is assumed

This review blows.

Pos because same rating

Album Rating: 3.5

"i really like all their other albums, but because this one sounds the same as those i don't like it."



poor logic my friend.



"If there were any other features of his cleans."



awkward/incomplete sentence.

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

well, if there's anything positive to say here at all, rants are better than track by tracks...

This isn't an awful review. It's not great, but doesn't necessarily deserve all these negs.

This album's grown off me a little bit on the second listen, but I love Keith's voice so, so much.

worse than my Abbey Road review and that is saying something.

Album Rating: 4.5

"Maybe there's a certain charm I missed, and if I did miss it, please enlighten me."



Yeah, definitely wouldn't put that there. Makes it sound unsure, which you don't want. Also, where did you hear the bit about the cum?

bloc would like this if it was infested with samey breakdowns and gay autotuned vocals

But I have another 100 bands to do that for me, what is one more?