Machine Head Unto the Locust
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Irving
Emeritus
September 29th 2011


7496 Comments


Which review?

Irving
Emeritus
September 29th 2011


7496 Comments


(So I can go back and neg it)

booreno62
September 29th 2011


69 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Where did all the negs. go? It was 6/14 and now it's 9/10?

wabbit
September 29th 2011


7059 Comments


not happening

DarkNoctus
September 29th 2011


12200 Comments


Not the sort of music I traditionally listen to (much prefer traditional groove like Sepultura, or other bands like Soulfly, Rise to Remain, Skindred etc.).


i don't normally listen to black metal. i listen to gorgoroth, emperor and burzum instead. :]

Spec
September 29th 2011


39391 Comments


zing

Yuli
Emeritus
September 29th 2011


10767 Comments


"Unless the goal was to be a magniloquent caricature of a review."

Your thesaurus is content!

rasputin
September 29th 2011


14967 Comments


fantastic review

rasputin
September 29th 2011


14967 Comments


Now at 2011, and we have and some sort of delusional insect model being dished up by frontman turned band-producer


typo, I think that second 'and' shouldn't be there

Not the sort of music I traditionally listen to (much prefer traditional groove like Sepultura, or other bands like Soulfly, Rise to Remain, Skindred etc.). I'm just open minded.


looool

MO
September 29th 2011


24016 Comments


Nice review man.

taylormemer
September 29th 2011


4964 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Ok, so to firstly adress the dissenters, I don't hate this album, it's really a solid 3, but not quite a 3.5 - obviously in my opinion. Secondly, yes I did listen to The Blackening for inspiration because this is really a by product of the tone accross that album.



Rasp, I have considered your suggestion and agree with it. Thanks dude.



Ipod, I generally like to think along the lines of more is usually less, and I don't like to reiterate permutations of the same ideas. Further, if I'm writing to an audience who generally known who Machine Head are then I generally won't go into the intricacies of their instrumentation or sound unless it's of some kind of actual distinction from anything they did before. When I have more ideas to express, then I express it in more content, but if I feel like I can convey my message in 300 words then so be it. Obviously, there are some who are alienated by that concept, and that's fine.



Irving, I'm sorry you feel that way, but I wonder if you're conclusions would be as dire if not for the brilliant display of fanboyism and discredit during the first few pages? Also, isn't this a case of the pot calling the kettle black with respect to verbosity? Either way I respect and appreciate your input.



As always, I thank the users who have shown a good level of maturity, which unfortunately is the same users as always. Are there any newbies who are actually not dumbasses?



Ah, I love this place.

Deviant.
Staff Reviewer
September 29th 2011


32289 Comments


Let's hug and make love

taylormemer
September 29th 2011


4964 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

If the ditch wasn't so expansive, I would.

pcar
September 29th 2011


530 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

What I don't quite understand is how people think "3" means bad



oh well, album is average anyways



2deep4me

NodScene23
September 29th 2011


274 Comments


Nothing wrong with a concise review but I think this album is deserving of more analysis. You seem to possess some fairly concrete conclusions about the album and Machine Head as a whole but aren't quite willing to delve into the origins of your thoughts that much. I think you could easily do so and still write a punchy review. I guess I'll just have to take your word for it that these broad conclusions are pretty well considered and not just the result of you being overly reactionary to the album after a listen or two?

taylormemer
September 29th 2011


4964 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Certainly not reactionary.

NodScene23
September 29th 2011


274 Comments


Whatever you say man. Solid review overall I guess. I'll pos.

DarkNoctus
September 29th 2011


12200 Comments


I don't hate this album, it's really a solid 3, but not quite a 3.5 - obviously in my opinion.


i really hate it when people feel the need to say 'in my opinion' because it's strongly implied by the fact that you shared your opinion.

taylormemer
September 29th 2011


4964 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

It's only there because I know that if I don't put it there some dickhead's gonna go "well that's just your opinion blah blah blah" which I don't want to get involved in.

Piglet
September 29th 2011


8475 Comments


hahahah i thought sputnik was better then this.
machine head are pretty boring.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy