Album Rating: 4.0

should be "Bright Eyes ARE dead..." but grammar idk

bright eyes as a project is dead

who the fuck BNM'd this?

Album Rating: 4.0

people with good tastes.

Album Rating: 3.5

bright eyes is a singular entity, the grammar is correct

also the best new music tag is correct

low blow, dude, low blow. did you like the new Iron and Wine too? if so you're batting 0/3 right now in my book for major indie releases this year.

Album Rating: 4.0

Guess I just struck out. Bright Eyes are a group of people though.

Album Rating: 3.5

a crowd is also a group of people, but it's still a singular entity

i feel like such a faggot right now for correcting grammar though

"a crowd is also a group of people, but it's still a singular entity"

this is how i learned it in Amerikkka.

Album Rating: 4.0

lol



And, I thought when you were talking about a band, and something specifically about them, then you didn't treat them as a singular entity. I'm not sure where I got this idea from, probably from being taught grammar horribly in school, but apparently I am wrong. Oh well, live and learn.

Album Rating: 4.0

the beatles IS good?

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

i usually treat it plural but



this is about



the bright eyes ideal

i never liked bright eyes anyway so i guess it's all cool

Album Rating: 3.0

@ Knott-



Okay.



I didn't mean that the only reason YOU think it's different is because of the spoken word. I just personally don't find it very different from the other Bright Eyes albums (as I made clear in both my comments). I did not feel "okay, they are doing something different this time" like with, maybe, the new Destroyer.



Plus, I agree more with the rating here than the other review.