Nirvana Nirvana
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
bassx901
October 15th 2005


13 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

sry music official. i appoligize for starting a fight with you. you are welcome to talk about your favorite bands, but you must also be ready to deal with criticism. i am officially appoligizing. This Message Edited On 10.17.05

masada
October 15th 2005


2733 Comments


[quote=the guy above]just like nirvana, they added to the demand for more and more SEATTLE bands.[/quote] Nirvana wasn't from Seattle.

Storm In A Teacup
October 15th 2005


26388 Comments


He's also very annoying.

bassx901
October 16th 2005


13 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

nirvana was from aberdeen wa origionally. the band formed there. that is a fact. however, nirvana played most of their shows in seattle. they are considered a seattle based band with the trademark seattle sound that is commonly refered to as grunge.

Electric City
Emeritus
October 16th 2005


15762 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

ugh I give up you guys win. Sorry I tried to talk about one of my favorite bands

Storm In A Teacup
October 16th 2005


26388 Comments


Granted they did play a lot of shows there, also their last American show was at Seattle, but they aren't from Seattle.

bassx901
October 16th 2005


13 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

dude.........ask ANY music historian and they will agree that nirvana is a seattle based rock band. they were influenced by the evolving music scene and in turn influenced that same musical movement. the band move to seattle near the end of their career. cobain "killed himself" at his home in SEATTLE

pulseczar
October 16th 2005


2385 Comments


it doesnt matter where Cobain killed himself, where the music scene was evolving, the point is that Nirvana formed in Aberdeen. That's what matter.

bassx901
October 17th 2005


13 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

nirvana is considered a seattle based rock band. they did not form there but are undoubtedly influenced by the musical revolution that is significant in seattle. listen to them. they have key elements that are siginficant to that revolution and are strictly regarded as seattle based. it does not matter where they formed. that is true for anything. take the modern truth that everything is influenced by 2 fundamentals. one is genetics or in this case where nirvana formed. the other is surrondings. they were influenced by their surrondings. they began to play the music which was revoluionizing the music scene in seattle. when nirvana surronded themselves with that type of music it influenced them just as a person's political interests are influenced by their geographical location in the us. it does not matter where they were born or formed, what matters is what influenced them. they spent much of their time in seattle so it is logical that type of music influenced them. i never said that nirvana was from seattle. i said that they had those key elements that were considered SEATTLE or GRUNGE like i perviously stated.

innerdark
October 17th 2005


749 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

case closed

sars
October 18th 2005


27 Comments


first of all. krist will wreck you, he's a freakin beast
and i think he was key to nirvana. he fits in alot more than ASS SMEAR. ( pat smear )

if i were to make an nirvana greatest hits it would be -

1. Blew
2. School
3. Paper cuts
4. Scoff
5. Big Cheese
6. Something in the way
7. Sliver
8. Big Long Now
9. Aero Zeppelin
10. Aneurysm
11. Milk It
12. Tourettes
13. You Know You're Right
14. PEN CAP CHEW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

just my opinion.
any comments?

sars
October 18th 2005


27 Comments


first of all. krist will wreck you, he's a freakin beast
and i think he was key to nirvana. he fits in alot more than ASS SMEAR. ( pat smear )

if i were to make an nirvana greatest hits it would be -

1. Blew
2. School
3. Paper cuts
4. Scoff
5. Big Cheese
6. Something in the way
7. Sliver
8. Big Long Now
9. Aero Zeppelin
10. Aneurysm
11. Milk It
12. Tourettes
13. You Know You're Right
14. PEN CAP CHEW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

just my opinion.
any comments?

Electric City
Emeritus
October 18th 2005


15762 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Considering two of these were hits, I'd have to disagree with you

sars
October 18th 2005


27 Comments


i dont think it matters if they were hits, personally, i think nirvanas best songs were the ones no one listened to ( or knew )

Electric City
Emeritus
October 18th 2005


15762 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

well what do you define as a hit? I think that a hit is something people know. Plus it's basically publicity to a band that'd been long gone for 8 years, so if you wanna get people to buy Nirvana, don't put tourette's on a greatest hits album.

sars
October 18th 2005


27 Comments


well, i think you've won that one. cheers.

:O ! go comment on my hole reviewww. tell me how badly it stinks.

Electric City
Emeritus
October 18th 2005


15762 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I'm not a fan of Hole. Your review could use more detail though.

sars
October 18th 2005


27 Comments


hm. i suppose. their isnt much to say though
thanks

Electric City
Emeritus
October 18th 2005


15762 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

no problem.

sars
October 18th 2005


27 Comments


:O have you watched that new family guy dvd? if so, how is it?



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2017 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy