Album Rating: 2.5
fu
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
sucks
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
h8r
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
lol i rmbr this review
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
booberrys review is better
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
the emotions run high here.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
is that a circle takes the square one?
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Pretty sure all 51 ratings are joke ratings. Dude taking this review to heart haha.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
So DANGERS just got added to teh show with Torche, Kvelertak, and Nails. I think I just jizzed out my asshole.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
So bad
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
ew
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Huh?
|
| |
I had this as a five for the longest time, but I realized one day that it was written by NO ONE and so I gave it a 1.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
damn
|
| |
Hopefully at some point I'll come to the conclusion that all albums are written by no one and then I'll delete all of my ratings.
And then i'll kill myself.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
While I applaud you for your bravery in posting a one star review on a site that worships this album, I would also like to say, as everyone else has, that this review is tripe.
It sounds like the work of a contrarian high schooler with a dictionary in hand, primarily because you use poorly-implemented "elevated" vocabulary (wow, so smart!) and you display an air of pretentiousness, as if you have some sense of authority. Also, everything you said was pseudo-philosophical, meaningless drivel that shows absolutely no reading comprehension skills or critical thinking whatsoever (you'd have to be an idiot to not get what he was saying on those songs, basically).
Old review, meaningless response, etc. I'm done.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off
this review lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
booberrys review is better yea
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
this album lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
lol
|
| |
|