Owl City Ocean Eyes
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
klap
Emeritus
March 23rd 2010


12409 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

perhaps you'd prefer a scimitar rasputin?

AggravatedYeti
March 23rd 2010


7683 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

maybe a dirk?

elephantREVOLUTION
March 23rd 2010


3052 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

old joke is old

Yotimi
March 23rd 2010


7666 Comments


Joke's old but review was still funny. Good job man.

natey
March 23rd 2010


4195 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

ironically the postal service was pretty good back in thed ay

LeotardMessiah2
March 23rd 2010


311 Comments


"thats fine some people will love it its still shit though"

like most of the albums you rave about

Brokenjewel
March 23rd 2010


1247 Comments


Epic review. Pos'd.



Titan50
March 23rd 2010


4588 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

^^^

robertsona
Staff Reviewer
March 24th 2010


27394 Comments



oh yeah and it's lobotomy, not labotomy, as you spelled it in your review. though lobotomies might often happen in a "lab," haha



good one!

AggravatedYeti
March 24th 2010


7683 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

the art form as a concept




as in if left to the devices of those who don't wish to push the boundaries, then it becomes stagnant as a form of expression, which in essence, is exactly what art is -- thus dying, the culture dead, there is none. Culture is flowing, it changes, if it no longer moves in any direction, there is no culture, no life, just moments in time.



Its not a question of if the boybands have won -- they did, it's more of trying to find a point from which to move on. If it were up to them, they would have never gone out of style, but they did.

It's a plea for the need of a counter-culture to in turn form mass culture as a whole. blahblahblah -- why were you arguing this in the first place?

AggravatedYeti
March 24th 2010


7683 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

the very idea of a counter-culture is reactionary. it inevitably becomes just another niche market within the dominant (or if you're a Gramscian or some bullshit postmodernist the "hegemonic") culture.


thus becoming mass culture and again facilitating the need for counter-culture. assumption is inevitable, influxes in culture run themselves out eventually, historically speaking.



since culture qua a set of traditions organically changing over time no longer exists




as in world culture is currently stagnant?what?really?

EnricoPalazzo
March 24th 2010


626 Comments


BUTTF**KING COMPLICITY

AggravatedYeti
March 24th 2010


7683 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

actually, "counterculture" only emerged as a mass phenomenon within a society that had achieved a very advanced level of material sophistication and extremely powerful technologies of communication.


or in any organized group of humans ever where some didn't agree with the others? Even in a musical sense the hippies were not the end all of counter culture, maybe if you were someone who was alive and part of the movement its now an end off for you, but I think its pretty safe to say culture is still fluctuating, growing. Yes, the psychedelic, peace/love movement has since been popularized, but there are plenty of counter-cultures floating about.



also I'd like to point out I agree with you that counter-culture was formed by virtue of the mass culture -- at least I think that's what you've been getting at and I've been agreeing but I'm not sure if you're understanding that.



what we today call "culture" is in fact "culture industry." it's not a question of change. it's a question the character of its change, of the total rationalization and administration of that change to the extent that even seeming ruptures and fragmentations that arise out of it are seamlessly reintegrated back into its whole




or in other words -- a fluctuating, healthy world culture

You speak more of mass media maybe? being a draw back of our current culture? which is a fruitless argument in the long wrong, but I'd see your point then.



but otherwise kthxbai.

AggravatedYeti
March 24th 2010


7683 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

also if you're insinuating to that asinine argument of there is no post-modern or art is dead then, well -- no.



debate was fun, good show.

shade
March 24th 2010


1198 Comments


EPIC

AggravatedYeti
March 24th 2010


7683 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

oh no nonsychronicity has an apathetic and cynical outlook on life and his place in the world :'(



you of course are just assuming all of this, and once again lumping one specific movement in culture as the counter culture. but ya sure.



I SEE YOUR POINT OK?

JulesWin
March 24th 2010


993 Comments


@ nonsynchronicity

that's good and all but yet I see no mention of buttfucking complicity
wtf?

natey
March 24th 2010


4195 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

chronic city, i want to go to chronic city

AggravatedYeti
March 24th 2010


7683 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Jules dats wat I been trying to get at this whole tiiiiiime!

Eclectic
March 24th 2010


3302 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

it's not even cynicism, it's just the ruthless criticism of everything existing


You're not a cynic, you're a realist, right?



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy