Crocell The God We Drowned
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
TricksterGRex
February 9th 2009


2087 Comments


A wild scyther has appeared!

scyther
February 9th 2009


1606 Comments


Slash

TricksterGRex
February 9th 2009


2087 Comments


You have blacked out.

Zippermouth
February 9th 2009


1305 Comments


Well, the review is isn't as bad as everyone says, the reason you have two negs is because you have earned a reputation as the biggest faggot/fanboy on this site.

If Bloodbath joined forces with Job for a Cowboy, Amon Amarth, Slayer and Dissection, this is what it would sound like.


So in other words, this albums sounds like 20+ angry motherfuckers all playing completely different things at the same time and end up sounding less like music and more like a barfight. God no, I'm not listening to this.

p.s. Comparing a band to JFAC is never a compliment.This Message Edited On 02.09.09

Zoo
February 9th 2009


3759 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

This has some good tracks but is ultimately quite forgettable and leaves you with an overall feeling of "meh" every time you listen to it.

Zippermouth
February 9th 2009


1305 Comments


Dude wtf, this is a Silverfang bashing thread, this ain't about music. Get out of here!

ikarus
February 9th 2009


577 Comments


you kept referring to the other bands, which doesnt help anything if the reader doesnt know what that sound is.

Zippermouth
February 9th 2009


1305 Comments


^ well most people have heard Slayer, and most people who are seriously into music will have heard JFAC and Amon Amarth, not too sure about Dissection or Bloodbath.

scyther
February 9th 2009


1606 Comments


Those are some funny looking statistics that you are completely pulling out of your ass.

Zippermouth
February 9th 2009


1305 Comments


yeah, its what I do.

gaslightanthem
February 9th 2009


5208 Comments


most people seriously into music would hopefully sidestep boring and generic bands like JFAC

Zippermouth
February 9th 2009


1305 Comments


Hopefully, but most fall into the trap at least once.

AngelPhoenix
February 9th 2009


2761 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

i would try not to set aside paragraphs for each instrument; it's not a bad way to review (i used to do it), but it's a bit predictable and if you do it too much you start to pigeonhole yourself into a boring, expected writing style. your first actual paragraph, where you talk about "behind the veil" is how you should try to style your whole review; try to focus on the songs and album as a whole instead of breaking them down to components such as a guitar part or a bass part or a certain vocal section. it's good to focus on specific parts if there's a standout, but try to keep in mind how all of the members of the band work together to make something good


Chan for staff.













Wait...

Essence
February 9th 2009


6692 Comments


^^

LOL






















Wait...

Si1v3RfaNg
February 9th 2009


823 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Oh and Chan, thanks for the wonderful advice!

Essence
February 9th 2009


6692 Comments


jeez silver stop sucking his dick so much

Si1v3RfaNg
February 9th 2009


823 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Your dick is the only one i suck

Essence
February 9th 2009


6692 Comments


HEY I PAY YOU TO SUCK MY DICK, NOT PULL OUT AND TELL ME ABOUT IT

Si1v3RfaNg
February 9th 2009


823 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

lol I can talk and gag, I'm the fucking real deal man.

Essence
February 9th 2009


6692 Comments


[quote=Si1v3RfaNg]lol I can talk and gag, I'm the ****ing real deal man.
[/quote]

There.
Inexorable proof that Silver is a tool.

From now on, I will post this in all of your reviews.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy