Underoath They're Only Chasing Safety
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
masada
August 8th 2005


2733 Comments


This music is too brewtle for me.

Society Sellout
August 26th 2005


292 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I wouldn't have got this album except for I had some gift cards and I needed to buy something :P. So I bought it and I pretty much agree with what the majority on here have said that it is very generic and watered down music. TCOT had a more unique sound and they basicially traded it to be just like ever other post-hardcore band out there who are trying to be "hardcore". This is a I'm-going-to-put-this-in-right-before-I-go-to-bed-because-its-that-boring album.

Cross Out The Eyes
September 5th 2005


42 Comments


how the hell can they be pop they scream
but maybe screaming can be pop but i dont think so

Storm In A Teacup
September 5th 2005


35165 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I thoght the album was good, but not worth buying. I just burned it from a friend.

screamo_rocks_101
September 13th 2005


88 Comments


i used to be such a huge fan of underoath until this cd came out. The new singer is ok, he juss sounds like every other band out there today. Before they had that distinctive scream, but sadly have lost it. I found myself only liking a few of the songs (3 or 4 of them), whereas on their last cds with the other singer (cannot remember his name), i loved all the songs. i was very VERY dissapointed with this one. id give it a 2 out of 5, mostly because theyve lost all originality.

Motleyguy
September 25th 2005


118 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I love this album, even though it tends to get repetitive, it's still amazing, they've definetely matured in their sound and have become tighter as a band since their first two releases.

TheTaste0fInk
September 28th 2005


3 Comments


Ok Underoath is amazing. The screaming does not sound at all like the "Hawthorne Heights" screaming but the not screaming singer has a slight similarity to HH. And "The Used" doesn't suck they own you all.

francesfarmer
October 5th 2005


1477 Comments


Haha...arguing about the screaming. To me, all of the screaming in todays newer hardcore/emo music sounds exactly the same; unless your talking about REFUSED screaming...which is good screaming.

rusty_knives
October 21st 2005


32 Comments


First off, the used doesn't suck, second How does underoath sound like hawthorne heights? They suck ass with there fake ass screaming and horrible lyrics, maybe you should check out it more.

Storm In A Teacup
October 21st 2005


35165 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Wow, after you first commented on my Slipknot review Rusty Knives I figured we wouldn't like the same music, but I like Underoath and The Used a lot and I HATE Hathorne Heights.



double lol :lol: :lol:

rusty_knives
October 21st 2005


32 Comments


Yeah, I pretty much despise hawthorne heights. I say that on the hawthorne heights review. Which I think everyone else did to

Storm In A Teacup
October 21st 2005


35165 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

^Same for me

Prophecy
October 21st 2005


52 Comments


Underoath=very good. Hawthorne Heights=not so good.

Havn't heard a lot from this album, just a few songs but I like the direction they've gone. "Selling-out" is an overused and ill-concieved term. They've matured and have evolved into something more complex than they were before.

36 minutes isn't that short. Just remember that Opposite of December by Poison the Well was only 28 minutes, and that was a landmark album.

drummrboy
October 22nd 2005


1 Comments


first off all comparing underoath to hawthorne heights is ridiculous anyone to make any comparison between the two might as well end it all because they arent worth the air that they are wasting by breathing second off ,Kripes, saying that an album isnt worth buying and then rating it a 4 is retarded and finally although not as good as there earlier stuff its still good and the nem stuff that they are playing live sorta hints that they are goin for a harder sound on their next cd

rusty_knives
October 22nd 2005


32 Comments


Well, they said underoath sounded like hawthorne heights on the first page, it's pretty ridicilous. They sound nothing like them. Underoath is way better.

AtTheDriveIn198d
November 9th 2005


158 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

underoath > used > hawthrone heights > not much

simple as that

CushMG15
December 12th 2005


1810 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I'm really not a fan of this album. I find it to be (minus a couple songs) rather boring.

AtTheDriveIn198d
December 16th 2005


158 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

this album is really good its just a shame they only wrote 9 songs and put that crap filler bit in just to make it up to 10.

masada
December 16th 2005


2733 Comments


I can't stand this band.

At all.

Zebra
Moderator
December 16th 2005


2647 Comments


Everyone at my highschool always raves about this band, I don't really understand why.

I think that underOATH has one decent song and I've listened to two of their albums.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2019 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy