Lol neither of you have actually listened to Zep Lepelin

lol b4k do you listen to The Beatles?

cause maybe you'd like the Schmeadles, a secret and underground Beatles side project of Lennon and Ringo

Instead of wasting their time writing brilliant and colorful pop songs that actually make sense, they wrote directionless noise epics, one is 60 minutes of Lennon farting into foxhole. It's very similar to both your Unfathoms efforts and very similar to the works of experimental music mastermind William Basinski.

they even have one song without haphazard genre juxtaposition! You'd love this band! But they were super underground and did the projects while The Beatles rose to fame....only a few hipsters knew about it, they are so indie it will make your head spin. You would really like them. Get their first LP: "Lennon's Fart, In E Major".

Album Rating: 5.0

bitchfork actually curious what do you think of the beatles

"It's very similar to both your Unfathoms efforts and very similar to mastermind William Basinski"
...
i'm just gonna kindly tell you to foad

i actually like the beatles but i find that a lot of their albums (certainly not sgt. pepzz) ae overrated

i love you b4k but I think you are way to holier-than-thou for a 13 year old. So which Beatles albums are overrated then

Album Rating: 5.0

all of them

Album Rating: 5.0

im one of those dudes who thinks none of their albums are overrated huge fan boy



id even call a few underrated (hard days night, POTENTIALLY beatles for sale)



the only one that is maybe overrated is help! and thats sort of a stretch cuz no one really talks

about it



their early period is sorta underrated overall imo

revolver and abbey road mostly. they're around 3s, certainly not 4.5s and 5s no matter how much social influence they had.

Album Rating: 5.0

Only problem I seriously have is Abbey Road... I'd say 3.5 or so probably, but hte fact it has a 4.6 average is a little ridiculous.

haha revolver at a 3.

and @Robertsona, some early Beatles was straight up shit. Their first two albums were atrocious. Obnoxious as fuck, but I guess that was pop in that time period.

Oh

and Bitchfork

Revolver is a 5

"Only problem I seriously have is Abbey Road... I'd say 3.5 or so probably, but hte fact it has a 4.6 average is a little ridiculous."

123

revolver bores the shit out of me most of the time.

maybe Revolver would be better if it had a 60 minute track that sounded like a giant lo-fi fart

i mean i'll either adore it or just pass on it by the third song

Album Rating: 5.0

"and @Robertsona, some early Beatles was straight up shit. Their first two albums were atrocious. Obnoxious as fuck, but I guess that was pop in that time period. "



i loved a lot of their first two albums

Album Rating: 5.0

maybe Revolver would be better if it had a 60 minute track that sounded like a giant lo-fi fart



lol'd. Couldn't help it.

the fist half of the album is flawless

"lol'd. Couldn't help it."

its true though

w
i
l
l
i
a
m

B
a
s
i
n
s
k
i

Album Rating: 5.0

stfu I still need to listen to that.





Honestly I'm not sure why you are even posting in this thread cause this album is probs everything you hate about music.