Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
green calx all day every day
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
amazing album
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
yes it is
|
| |
yes it isn't
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
so chill
|
| |
Oh shit sorry guys!, I decided to re-listen to this on the train and I see the light now. This is truly a fucking outstanding record. Seems like Andy was right all along.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Seems like Andy was right all along
word
|
| |
this is consistently enjoyable, but vol II is godly
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Making sense to me now
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Best Aphex for sure, although RDJ gives it some competition.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
what pitt said =)
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
listen to "Ageispolis" on a subwoofer....... hoooooolllllyyyyyyy shit.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
yea - this is one's the shit yo
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
study music ftw
|
| |
I can't study to any music unless it's classical because anything but classical distracts me.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
album is too good
considering bumping my rating
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
You should. Nearly a 5 for me.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
yuppp. i like studying to air, zero 7, trentemoller, thievery corporation. this is like borderline study music for me
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Very good review, love this album.
But when scoring tracks individually, is it really necessary to use decimal places? A simple out of five rating (i.e. 1,2,3,4 or 5/5) would do the trick. I mean if a track is given 4.8./5.0, thats effectively 48/50. Why not just give it a five. With a /5 rating, a score of 5 does not necessarily mean perfect. I think an out of 10 rating system is best (no decimals).
Sorry just venting, I just find it odd how so many people are so hung up ratings to the point of using decimal places. Same goes for movies, games etc. People and their numbers 
|
| |
dude this was written in 2005
on second read though im finding it quite funny that he keeps calling the sample loops 'riffs'
|
| |
|
|
