Album Rating: 4.5

ahem, Breath, Us and them, Time and Brain Damage aren't boring at all.



What's so great about them is the finished product of their music. If you consider each band member like you're doing, of course they're not that great. The individual musicans aren't amazing on their own. But when they all get together and write, the music is excellent.This Message Edited On 05.31.06

Album Rating: 4.5

Yeah. Well, see here's the thing about opinions. Everyone has got them, and they're not all the same. Not to sound like a dick, so don't take it that way. "Time" isn't boring, once you get past the dull intro. And I actually feel the oppostite. I think they're great musicians, but I don't like the music they make 90% of the time. Hey, just me though. This Message Edited On 05.31.06

Album Rating: 4.5

Ok, fine. What if they were to cut out all of the long intros?

Album Rating: 4.5

Hmm... I imagine I'd find them more listenable, but I really couldn't say for sure.

Album Rating: 3.5

All bands have long intros occasionally. It's what makes them...them.

All bands have long intros? I think that might be pushing it.

...what about The Ramones? Nirvana?

Album Rating: 3.5

Okay, well maybe not ALL. But many do

I cant see doing a tbt on this album despite its pointlessness i actually like empty spaces it sounds cool IMO.

I don't understand the notion that Dark Side of the Moon is boring. It's one of the most enjoyable records I own.

Album Rating: 4.0

It can be very boring. Especially during a few intros when there's just like no music or just random sounds. Sometimes I just want the song to start without all that stupid bullshit befiore it. It's still pretty good, though.

This kicks it's ass, though.

Album Rating: 5.0

good review, although you rated some songs quite low and in the end your review should have ended up with the album recieving a lower rating.