Album Rating: 5.0
Greatest album of all time for me
|
| |
Jammin' this hard.
Album is sweet.
|
| |
Felt compelled to relisten. Rocks Off rules hard.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Album rules.
|
| |
Nice to see you like the Stones man. Overlooked band on this site.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
The Stones are still second to the Beatles for me, but I can't deny that they're a fantastic band.
|
| |
The Who > both
|
| |
I've always thought the Beatles were a bit safe and basic musically, although I haven't jammed 'em much album-wise. So that limits my opinion.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Fair enough. I respect the Beatles more due to the fact that they were the first band that I actually liked as a kid, and because they didn't bother to put out as many stinkers as the Stones. I gotta jam more of the Who, though.
|
| |
Haven't jammed The Who much sadly.
|
| |
Who's Next is one of the best albums ever
|
| |
This is a pretty tough album to stomach, but I dig it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Danny, you've got to hear from Revolver through Abbey Road. Very little of it safe or basic musically. It's still not like crazy guitar solos, but they use dissonance and the kind of harmonic textures you find in 20th century classical. I'd say they were only second to Zappa in terms of mid-late 60s avant garde rock. And the fact they're catchy as hell is a bonus ;)
|
| |
Need to British Invasion hard basically.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Yup.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
"I've always thought the Beatles were a bit safe and basic musically"
Far from that man. I think that you'll definitely realise that if you check their discog.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
The Beatles were very diverse, they were commercial, yes, but safe is not the best term to describe their stuff, they took a lot of big risks throughout their career
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
gd album
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
damn let it loose is perfect
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
AND I HID THE SPEED INSIDE MY SHOOOOOOOOEEEEEEESSSS
|
| |
|
|
