Ulver Bergtatt - Et eeventyr i 5 capitler
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Angmar
November 26th 2007


2688 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

lol, could Josh D possibly be any more of a failure?



I mean...



IS IT POSSIBLE?

masscows
November 27th 2007


2230 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I think Nattens Madrigal is better than this one. As a whole this one seems like more of a musical accomplishment because of how it incorporates alot of different elements seamlessly, but I think Nattens Madrigal has a better atmosphere and the riffs are better overall.

SynGates
December 8th 2007


2467 Comments


This is better than Nattens imo. The cancerous production on Nattens doesn't help either.

masscows
December 8th 2007


2230 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

The "cancerous" production is part of why it's better than this one. Necro production wouldn't fit this album, but it does absolute wonders for Nattens Madrigal and that's part of the reason it has a better atmosphere.

SynGates
December 8th 2007


2467 Comments


hm, I gave it another listen on headphones and I guess it does actually give it a signature element, and I could also actually hear things on headphones. Perhaps I was a bit harsh, but I still think Bergtatt is more timeless

Dis_Con_Nec_Ted
December 11th 2007


5098 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

[quote=]They're kind of like the Opeth of black metal I guess.[/quote]

[quote=]Except their songs don't get boring.[/quote]



Hmmm... That's exactly what I thought this was, and kinda cheesy at times with those clean high in the mix vocals.



The production was the icing on the cake :/

Angmar
December 11th 2007


2688 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Oh my god, seriously you people are fucking pathetic if you cannot handle the production on this album, go listen to Belketre and then complain about production, but for god sakes this album has production as clear and atmospheric as it needs to be.



And calling Garms' high vocals cheesy is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. This Message Edited On 12.10.07

Dis_Con_Nec_Ted
December 11th 2007


5098 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Well, it wasn't the right word. There's nothing wrong the high vocals themselves, I just thought they sounded out of place at times.



This Message Edited On 12.12.07

masscows
December 11th 2007


2230 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I don't see how you can say this album's production is bad, it's not lo-fi by any means.

rattlehead42147
December 11th 2007


1345 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Angmar is correct on all accounts.

SynGates
December 12th 2007


2467 Comments


Production = great.
Garm's vocals = awesome.

jrowa001
December 12th 2007


8752 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Angmar speaks the truth

Dis_Con_Nec_Ted
March 22nd 2008


5098 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

[quote=]Hmmm... That's exactly what I thought this was, and kinda cheesy at times with those clean high in the mix vocals.







The production was the icing on the cake :/[/quote]



I'll take back what I said there. I recently listened to this again and I must say I'm impressed. Amazing atmosphere and arrangements. Just ordered it so I can have this unique piece of music in my collection



This Message Edited On 03.22.08

Yazz_Flute
March 22nd 2008


19174 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I want this really badly. But I ordered Arcturus-The Sham Mirrors and will have it by tomorrow :thumb:

AngelPhoenix
March 22nd 2008


2761 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Yeah, I don't much care for straight black metal, but somehow this album just owns me.

Hawks
March 23rd 2008


86781 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

This isnt really straight Black Metal. This is more of Black Metal and Folk Metal mixed.

rasputin
March 23rd 2008


14967 Comments



Yeah, I don't much care for straight black metal

check out Ulver's Natterns Madrigal, that's pretty black

Hawks
March 23rd 2008


86781 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

That album rules. Best Black Metal album ever IMO.

AngelPhoenix
March 23rd 2008


2761 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

This isnt really straight Black Metal. This is more of Black Metal and Folk Metal mixed


You're right Hawks, my bad, ironically enough, it's really those folk elements you speak of that makes this album own me lol.

Hawks
March 24th 2008


86781 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I agree. I wish they would've stuck with the Black/Folk Metal thing throughout their career. The only non-metal album i like of theirs is Shadows Of The Sun.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy