The Monolith Deathcult
The White Crematorium


2.0
poor

Review

by Ryce USER (3 Reviews)
October 20th, 2009 | 4 replies


Release Date: 2005 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Remember in my review of Triumvirate when I said I was going to check out this band's earlier material?

I did.

I wish I hadn't.

The first time I heard The Monolith Deathcult's Triumvirate was during a period in which the lion's share of what I listened to was death metal, and, as such, it was getting boring. Enter The Monolith Deathcult's Triumvirate. Here was something excitingly fresh! (Albeit in a simplistic and gimmicky way.) Something to give hope to a rapidly stagnating genre! Now, when one hears something that they just rave about to everyone they know, and listen to nonstop, one is likely to want to check out their previous material. (After all, the quality of a band's music is usually inversely proportional to the number of years they've worked, amirite?) So excited was I, that I put down twenty-five dollars to have [b]The White Crematorium[/i] imported from Belgium. One day, I received in the mail a small package of a familiar shape; I feverishly tore it open, and inside was my gem - The White Crematorium. I carefully placed the CD on my computer's disc tray, and, as soon as I could, began to listen.....

The next realization was a slow and painful one - I was listening to ****.

I listened to the whole thing, hoping that I would at least get a couple of good tracks, but aside from a few isolated seconds of (slightly) above-mediocrity, it was pure disappointment. When looking at the tracks before actually playing them, I noticed that they were relatively short, with the exception of one. I thought that this would mean more condensed versions of the epics The Monolith Deathcult composed on Triumvirate, but what it really meant was, thankfully, a mercifully shorter sentence.

Another complaint that I wish I didn't have to make: on this album The Monolith Deathcult perpetrated one of the most heinous transgressions against not sucking imaginable - piss-like homogeneity. I mean, there is no way to differentiate one track from another. They all begin in one of two highly predictable ways: Blast beats, or whammy-bar masturbating "solos." Wait, I need to correct myself. There is a third Intro Method - whammy-bar masturbating "solo" OVER a blast beat. I apologize.

Now, one more point I feel I need to touch on is the fact that this is an earlier release, and does not reflect the band's sound today. However, this is a review of The White Crematorium.

So, here's the breakdown:

PROS: Sometimes, for a few seconds, this record didn't sound like a two out of five.

CONS: The rest of the time, it did.

Two out of five.


user ratings (11)
2.8
good


Comments:Add a Comment 
Ryce
October 21st 2009


81 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

My first in about nine months.....dayum.

Willie
Moderator
October 21st 2009


20212 Comments


Now, one more point I feel I need to touch on is the fact that this is an earlier release, and does not reflect the band's sound today. However, this is a review of The White Crematorium.
So, where's the review?

Ryce
October 21st 2009


81 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

There are a couple of paragraphs of actual review content.....there just wasn't a whole lot to talk about.

Ticondaroga
February 4th 2011


231 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Albums not as bad as you make it sound. It kinda rips off nile, but its a good album imo listen to their debut too its better than this but not as good as their most recent(defs the most brootalist tho).



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy