Vattnet
Settler


3.5
great

Review

by zaruyache USER (29 Reviews)
July 10th, 2015 | 31 replies


Release Date: 2015 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Vattnet Viskar take a hard look in the mirror and finally figure out just what exactly they were trying to achieve all along.

Vattnet Viskar’s debut album was a mess of everything wrong with post-black metal; many of the transitions from soft to heavy were clumsy at best, much of the “minimalist ambient post-rock” attempted was laughably pointless, and many mixing decisions were downright baffling in their intent. While the band did show a decent ability to write interesting black metal riffs, the album’s structuring and pacing held it back from being effective at much of anything--resulting in a jumbled mess of brilliance and half-assery.

Sky Swallower left you to wonder: after monumentally failing to create the uplifting, epic black metal for which they set out on their debut, what in the world would Vattnet Viskar try to achieve on their sophomore album?
Thankfully, the answer seems to be “anything but a sequel” as Settler sounds almost nothing like its predecessor. Instead of taking a second whack at creating fancy uplifting post-rock mixed with black metal, ‘Viskar have instead opted to dial back the pretense--in a way--to create a more straight-forward sound whilst simultaneously employing a more detailed and functional style of songwriting.

By cutting out all of the rather awkwardly placed post-rock and focusing more on creating atmosphere through the metal itself, the band have created the album they should’ve put out three years ago. Instead of creating another strictly post-black record, they’ve this time opted for a far more post-metal-oriented sound, mixing much of their post-rock influences into the metal itself rather than making them strictly separate from it. The end result is a much sludgier, mostly post-metal record that still firmly clings to its ferocious melodic black metal roots.

And the result is (very honestly) completely surprising--because it all actually works. While Sky Swallower didn’t seem to know if it wanted to be Wolves in the Throne Room, Altar of Plagues, or some sort of bleaker Hammock, Settler not only knows what it wants but has the detailed blueprints for how to get there as well as the knowhow to put it all together. For example, “Heirs” starts with blast beats and melodic riffing before smoothly shifting into a short post-rock build-up with a metal crescendo and finishes with another crescendo of blackened riffing and excellent melodic leads. While such a feat of stylistic and structural shifts would’ve been borderline impossible for Vattnet Viskar circa 2012, now such accomplishments seem completely trivial. The band have definitely, finally, gotten their sh*t together.

But, while Settler boasts an immense improvement in songwriting, its sound quality seems to have taken a bit of an intentional-yet-unintentional dip. As if in an attempt to completely disregard their last album, the band have also abandoned the perfectly clean, full sound of their debut for a much more raw or “purposefully bad” sound. It sounds as if the band recorded the album normally then took out the lower end in order to synthetically give it more lo-fi, “true” black metal quality. While distancing themselves further from the debut does make sense, the resulting mix leaves the record without a lot of the oomph its heavier sections potentially could’ve capitalized on, and the vocals end up seeming a little too synthetic in their aggressiveness.

Despite those minor issues with the mixing, though, Settler is still a surprisingly enjoyable record by a band that really had no business making anything this good. They seem to have finally figured out their strengths and learned from their past mistakes to improve on their style in just about every way. And for that, I’m truly thankful.

3.4/5



Recent reviews by this author
Blood Incantation Luminescent BridgeTrha Rhejde Qhaominvac Tla Aglhaonamëc
Azazel Crucify the Jesus Christ AgainTagefolket Lad Asketid Begynde
Sanguine Eagle Storm MysticismGraves (NZ) Fides Ad Nauseam
user ratings (76)
3.5
great


Comments:Add a Comment 
zaruyache
July 10th 2015


27354 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

tl;dr they took all the pretentious twinkly post-rock crap and shoved it into their sludge influences to make a better bm album with loads of post-metal/sludge and it doesn't suck.

zaruyache
July 10th 2015


27354 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

I completely ignored the art for obvs reasons. I think they made some videos about space travel and junk, so it might be a concept album about "Settling" space, who knows. This isn't really a "black" metal album though so I'm not worried but the lulzy not kvlt cover.

Mewcopa0
July 10th 2015


1880 Comments


I liked the first VV LP but this was really booring.

zaruyache
July 10th 2015


27354 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

first album was a jumbled mess of nonsensical pseudo-pretentious songwriting.

Sniff
July 10th 2015


8041 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

This is boring but brings some of the riffs so I'm okay with it.

Jacob818Hollows
July 22nd 2015


218 Comments


I thought Sky Swallower was super good, but I can see where you don't like it. I just got this one, so I'm looking forward to hearing it now. The cover was kind of a put-off initially.

osmark86
July 24th 2015


11387 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

I think this album is the bees knees. Nothing too original, but they nailed the songwriting. Solid review, pos.

FearThyEvil
August 12th 2015


18544 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

pretty damn good

BrushedRed
September 16th 2015


3556 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Right up my alley

copycatchord
December 17th 2015


21 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

These guys really stepped it up....fantastic stuff here.

osmark86
December 17th 2015


11387 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

agreed. the songwriting is excellent and the lo-fi:er production value really tops it off.

zaruyache
December 17th 2015


27354 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

nah the crappy production feels weird and tacked-on just to get them bm cred.

Loksburry
January 22nd 2016


1 Comments


About the cover art (from pitchfork):

Vattnet Viskar's sophomore LP Settler takes its inspiration from a photo taken in 1985 by the New York Times' Keith Meyers. It depicts the late astronaut Christa McAuliffe floating in a zero gravity chamber—a notorious form of training that fellow astronauts have coined "the vomit comet"—not too long before the 1986 Challenger Disaster which took her life. What's so remarkable about the photo is that McAuliffe doesn't look the least bit sick or discomforted as she coasts, her grin visible under the harsh rays of the sun. "It's one of the most conflicted things I've ever seen," co-founder and guitarist Chris Alfieri said of Meyers' photo (a recreation of which serves as the cover to Settler) in a recent press release, "to be so happy, at the peak of life, only to have it all gone right after."

Nostreetdate
March 2nd 2016


52 Comments


zaruyache
July 9th 2015
11669 Comments
Report this Post
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

first album was a jumbled mess of nonsensical pseudo-pretentious songwriting.

These statements are always bizarre. How exactly was the songwriting pretentious?


zaruyache
March 2nd 2016


27354 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

they tried to combine black metal with artsy fartsy reverb-heavy twinkly post-rock chords with no rhyme or reason to any of their transitions in style, all apparently for the sake of "dynamic" songwriting. It was a disorganized mess of ideas and an attempt to imitate all the other fancy schmancy bands out there doing similar things.



pseudo-pretentious makes no sense idk I'll prob get rid of that bit thanks for the support!

zaruyache
March 2nd 2016


27354 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Also I said in the first comment what was pretentious about their first album

Nostreetdate
March 3rd 2016


52 Comments


How are reverbed chord progressions "artsy fartsy"? You could definitely make a case for disjointed and scattered song craft but where do you get that the their chief aim was to imitate other, more successful bands or that the songs are "pretentious" or make exaggerated claims of importance? Makes no sense...

zaruyache
March 3rd 2016


27354 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

post-rock is a pretty artsy fartsy genre tbh. It's all twinkles and reverb pedals.



their chief aim was to imitate other, more successful bands



their debut sounded like a mashup of Altar of Plagues style heavy riffs and WitTR fast "epic" riffing, with random bouts of twinkles interspersed between the two. They put random and rather pointless post-rock sections into their music for really no reason other than to just be post-bm because that was the current "cool" thing to be since none of those sections really served structural purposes in any of the songs. Idk maybe I shoulda just called it poseur bm? Either let's just forget about their crappy debut and jam the actual riffz and coherent songwriting in this one. m/ m/ m/

zaruyache
September 16th 2016


27354 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

is your step-aunt an astronaut

cndflg
August 25th 2017


10 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

You should look up the Pitchfork review for insight on the art..



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy