| ||Full Review||Ratings (360)
||Give your Rating|
|5.0 classic||Mickeymau5 | August 13th 12|
Gonna have more sweeps than a street cleaner.
6 Bumps | Bump
|3.0 good||Andrew W. Gold CONTRIBUTOR | November 1st 12|
Technical as hell, gravity blasts up the ass, insane breakdowns, and schizophrenic vocals. Pretty much all the ingredients needed for a great tech deathcore album.
2 Bumps | Bump
|3.5 great||Mazaku | October 27th 12|
Some really great stuff in here. Some of the transitions feel thrown together. But these rguys definitely have talent.
1 Bumps | Bump
|2.0 poor||EasterInTheBatcave | December 24th 15|
Look, it's pretty bad-- ridiculously overproduced, one-dimensional technical death metal-- but it's also sort of fun. Its semi-parodical nature is refreshing in a genre as trite and unjustly stone-faced as tech death.
|1.0 awful||TonyOlive | July 4th 15|
Generic riffs, terribly sterile production, extremely synthetic sound. This is a poor man's Wormed. Only for the hipster, scenester crowd.
|3.5 great||Kronzo | August 6th 13|
This new album is definitely a step-up in terms of songwriting. The music is still way too technical, over-the-top and fun as always. However, this stuff is almost TOO ridiculous for it's own good and can be a pain to listen to unless you're in the right mood and even like technical deathcore.
|3.0 good||SputnikSweetheart | January 10th 13|
This album's great; some songs are better than others but they over all quality well deserves a 3.0. Score would actually be higher if it wasn't for the production; drums seems to have been recorded with an electronic set and it sounds too dull and it grows you off easily, also it is too high and it covers the guitars and bass a bit. Also too many sweeps and too little solos in my opinion. Fast is fast but sometimes variety instead of speed can give better results. Anyway, great album. Recommended tracks: Objective to harvest, Utopia, Shards of scorched flesh, Fruitless existence.
|1.5 very poor||pyroflare77 | November 4th 12|
Well, at least it's slightly better than the first album, mainly due to improved production that doesn't hurt my ears. The music still leaves a lot to be desired for.
|3.5 great||TheNotrap | November 4th 12|
The logical sequel to Embryonic Anomaly. Band deserves credit for creating a distinctive sound signature.
|4.0 excellent||Daniel Davis EMERITUS | November 1st 12|
The songs sound like actual songs now? Count me in.
|4.0 excellent||GeometricSexEd | October 30th 12|
Heavy as fuck, still have that sick tone, and the new vocalist is beastly.
|4.0 excellent||RenobJc | October 28th 12|
Considering how long everyone has been waiting for ROS to release ANYTHING other than memes on their facebook page, this is damn good. Worth the wait. Good shit.
|4.5 superb||cisumkintups | October 28th 12|
Focusing a lot more on song structure, even though they hardly have a grasp of it, these guys know their way around their instruments.
|2.5 average||Henry Caouette | October 28th 12|
This album is frighteningly technical and were not talking brain drill, were talking calculated musical rprecision. Drum production is a tad bit over the top IMO, the snare is too loud and the low end guitar tone rcould use a little mid range unless theyre trying to keep away from the mid range 'djent' area.
|4.0 excellent||boolin | October 6th 16|
|1.5 very poor||LoganVT | October 1st 16|
|1.0 awful||Jake B | August 8th 16|
|3.5 great||Wicker | July 29th 16|
|2.5 average||Drew | May 13th 16|
|4.5 superb||Drifts | March 22nd 16|
|2.5 average||Tyler | March 14th 16|
|4.0 excellent||CWBrown | February 19th 16|
|4.0 excellent||Baiabaia | February 11th 16|
|2.5 average||ninja | January 6th 16|
|1.5 very poor||8genre | January 5th 16|
|3.0 good||btati | November 12th 15|
|4.5 superb||Tjler | October 30th 14|
|4.5 superb||Mercy | October 12th 14|
|5.0 classic||fer443 | October 10th 14|
|2.5 average||betray | October 7th 14|
|1.0 awful||MO | August 7th 14|
|3.5 great||JSJC | July 31st 14|
|2.5 average||Qorx | July 13th 14|
|2.0 poor||adr | June 29th 14|
|3.0 good||Bill | June 24th 14|
|3.5 great||NVCTOR | June 20th 14|
|3.0 good||Xavi | May 12th 14|
|3.5 great||Fujay | April 20th 14|
|4.0 excellent||Miggl | April 20th 14|
|3.5 great||paulxc | April 15th 14|
|4.0 excellent||DyerTF | April 6th 14|
|2.5 average||Tom | January 21st 14|
|2.5 average||Zeg | November 22nd 13|
|4.0 excellent|| ^_^ | November 18th 13|
|3.0 good||chaitu | November 12th 13|
|4.0 excellent||Viraemia | September 10th 13|
|4.0 excellent||Speed512 | September 4th 13|
|3.5 great||ilkb | July 22nd 13|
|4.0 excellent||SMUD | July 18th 13|
|5.0 classic||GhostK | July 10th 13|
|2.0 poor||daghe | June 26th 13|
|3.5 great||E0N | May 11th 13|
|2.0 poor||tdk6 | April 25th 13|
|4.0 excellent||TBliss2 | April 25th 13|
|4.0 excellent||JeudyEv | April 9th 13|
|3.5 great||groov | April 9th 13|
|4.0 excellent||maddin | March 14th 13|
|4.0 excellent||thaylor | March 5th 13|
|3.5 great||Dabaens | February 19th 13|
|4.5 superb||RayRay | February 16th 13|
|3.5 great||N2B3J | February 4th 13|
|1.5 very poor||Jacquibim STAFF | January 26th 13|
|3.5 great||kakuei | January 20th 13|
|5.0 classic||Weedon | January 10th 13|
|4.0 excellent||Torgol | January 7th 13|
|3.0 good||Lambda | December 26th 12|
|4.0 excellent||sacc87 | November 15th 12|
|4.5 superb||ta loco | November 12th 12|
|3.0 good||Drawk | November 6th 12|
|2.0 poor||apert | November 4th 12|
|4.5 superb||TomTibo | November 1st 12|
|1.5 very poor||srm90 | November 1st 12|
|5.0 classic||ROS7 | October 31st 12|
|4.0 excellent||Shiduba | October 31st 12|
|3.5 great||brunch | October 31st 12|
|1.0 awful||KILL | October 31st 12|
|4.0 excellent||DWiz | October 31st 12|
|4.0 excellent||DeadGuy | October 30th 12|
|2.0 poor||Paul W | October 29th 12|
|4.0 excellent||Custy | October 28th 12|
|4.5 superb||Meowza | October 27th 12|
Give Your Opinion on Dingir