">
 

King Crimson
In the Wake of Poseidon


3.0
good

Review

by Iluvatar USER (168 Reviews)
September 3rd, 2006 | 135 replies


Release Date: 1970 | Tracklist


Sometimes a band just can’t follow up a brilliant debut. To put it simply, In the Wake of Poseidon is to In the Court of the Crimson King what “Cannonball Run 2” is to “Cannonball Run”; a fun and slightly interesting ride through the same old, same old.

Obviously, King Crimson’s first release was hailed upon its release as something groundbreaking, something special. Thus, when heading into the studio (relatively soon after their first release, even for the time period), King Crimson was under pressure to create something as poignant and awe-inspiring as In the Court…. The first real track (after a calm little intro entitled Peace/A Beginning) is an indication of the approach they seemingly took in the studio; replicate the energy and vastness of their first album.

Sure, Pictures of a City doesn’t initially sound like the barnburner 21st Century Schizoid Man. However, when you really listen to the song, you cant help but notice the similarities: the way the song crashes and ascends, the sudden violent explosions of sounds to accompany verses, the fast paced and jittery instrumental bridge. It’s just wrapped in a pretty, slightly more jazz-based package that makes it seem more fresh than it really is. However, it is important to note that Fripp has vastly improved here, as his guitar solo, unlike before, easily matches that of Peter Giles (replacement bassist for Greg Lake, who merely did vocal work here) and Michael Giles’s drumming.

In fact, the slight shift in the lineup was the first King Crimson would have in their largley chaotic history, and it was perhaps the one that had the least effect on the music. While the excellent Greg Lake had stepped down from bass duties, Peter does a suitable job for most of the album, although he never really shows off like Lake used to do. The other changes are mostly actual solidified additions, such as flutist and sax player Mel Collins, who adds both the most serene and frenzied moments on the album with his instruments, respectively. Future singer Gordon Haskell also makes a brief appearance on the dreadfully dreary song Cadence and Cascade.

Previously, King Crimson had done I Talk to the Wind, a slow and moody flute driven track that was emotionally touching and moving. Much in the same manner they recreated 21st Century Schizoid Man for this album, so they do with that track on Cascade and Cadence. Except, unlike last time, this version is just plodding and a complete waste of time. However, the preceding track finally shows promise for the record, as In the Wake of Poseidon finally gives this album a sense of self. It’s a sweeping mellotron song in the fashion of Epitaph before it, but the similarities generally stop there, as the song actually has a strange irony about it, something rather inexpressible in words. It’s not the strongest track on the album and drags on far too long for its 8 minute length, but at least it’s a start.

When you finally reach Cat Food, the album finally hits its peak. It’s the most unique song from the earliest parts of King Crimson’s career,. No other song sounds quite like it, and the funk bassline and the crazy vocals (it’s very straight-to-the-point delivery, something King Crimson had never really done). The piano in the song is eclectic and gives the song another layer that nothing else on here possesses, and the general inanity of the song (the chorus is “No use to complain, if your caught out in the rain-Your mother’s quite insane- Cat food, Cat food, Cat food!”) is quite a treat, and the lightheartedness is a welcome respite from the dark atmosphere of the rest of the album.

In fitting fashion, the centerpiece song of the album also encompasses it the most clearly. The Devil’s Triangle, an instrumental take on a much older orchestral composition, is long, slow, and epic; with the first few minutes slowly fading into all of its glory. It certainly doesn’t sound like anything on their debut, that’s for sure. Except, the song never really impresses you. Sure, it’s a very good piece of work, and you could call it brilliant, even. But for all its wonder and pizzazz, the song never really gets to that point. That point that really tells you why you’ve been listening to the song, and gives you the big payoff for all your listening endeavors.

That’s In the Wake of Poseidon for ya. A very slow romp through jazz-based and hard rock-based progressive, with nearly all of its ideas taken from previous works, specifically by themselves. It’s sort of a stopgap between the brilliance of In the Court of the Crimson King and Lizard, as it contains some of the flashes the latter would soon contain, but is trapped in the confines and sounds of their former work. It isn’t a bad record, but by no means is it something a non-King Crimson fan should bother to check out.

Recommended tracks:
In the Wake of Poseidon
Cat Food




Recent reviews by this author
Say Anything HebrewsWashboard Leo Thomas Louisiana Bluegrass
Crusades Perhaps You Deliver This Judgement...Against Me! Transgender Dysphoria Blues
Los Campesinos! No BluesArcade Fire Reflektor
user ratings (1287)
3.8
excellent
other reviews of this album
SgtPepper EMERITUS (4)
It may not be a groundbreaking opus like its predecessor, but it is nonetheless another valued addit...

e210013 (4)
In the wake of their debut, but it’s more than that. It’s more like a cross between their debut ...

Nagrarok (3)
In the Court/Wake of The Crimson King/Poseidon?...

rhcp pman (4)
While ITWOP is not as original or groundbreaking as their debut, it is still a very good album. Plea...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Intransit
September 3rd 2006


2797 Comments


good review, I think Im definitely going to check out this Cat Food song though

metallicaman8
September 3rd 2006


4677 Comments


Great review, as always.

Bron-Yr-Aur
September 3rd 2006


4405 Comments


Good work Ilu. Not as good as metallicamn8's stuff, but you know.

metallicaman8
September 3rd 2006


4677 Comments


Good work Ilu. Not as good as metallicamn8's stuff, but you know.


I'm not sure how to take that.

pulseczar
September 3rd 2006


2385 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

ABOUT MUTHAFUCKING TIME I WOULD SAY

:-* lovely

lol there's metallicaman8

metallicaman8
September 3rd 2006


4677 Comments


I'm puzzled. Am I being mocked or complimented? I'm thinking mocked.This Message Edited On 09.03.06

Zebra
Moderator
September 3rd 2006


2647 Comments


If you say this is worse then "In the Court..." then I'm not going anywhere near it. Good review.

Kage
September 3rd 2006


1172 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

This review sucks. It says exactly the same thing as every other review of this album I've ever read. Way to form your own opinion about it.



I'm getting sick of reviews just rehashing the same thing over and over. 95% of the ConstruKction of Light have the word "self-referential" in it, and etc. etc. It's just getting really old.

Brain Dead
September 3rd 2006


1150 Comments


Ah Iluvatar, you never take a neg easily, do you?

pulseczar
September 3rd 2006


2385 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

It's kind of hard to have a completely unique opinion on everything, Kage. That doesn't mean it's not a good review.

Kage
September 3rd 2006


1172 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

That's got nothing to do with it. I've read some great, unique, entertaining, aweseome reviews from Iluvatar, and this is not one of them.



He says almost the exact same thing as several other reviews I've read of this album. Comparing certain tracks to songs from ITCOTCK, saying its a rehash. It's just so mindnumbingly old when I keep reading the same thing and I never get new views presented.



I'm talking about at other websites too, not just sputnik. Every review always says the same thing. Is it just because the world is one entity, and so opinions seem to be shared? Maybe.



Kage
September 3rd 2006


1172 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I expected you to have something of value to say, since you have a somewhat unique opinion about Lizard. I was let down.



I'm not going to argue about it, I negged the review and gave a reason for it. I guess I'm not allowed to neg someone who is so well-loved on the site without catching flack for it.



You think my reason for negging your review is stupid, I think you reasons for negging the album are stupid. There, we're even.

Kage
September 3rd 2006


1172 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Everything King Crimson does is amazing so just stfu.

Kage
September 3rd 2006


1172 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Nonsense. I was just listening to Beat earlier today. It's a great record.

Kingofdudes
September 3rd 2006


294 Comments



I dont think it is a valid reason to say his review isnt well written just because you dont like his opinion, and try to put him down for not having an "original" opinion.This Message Edited On 09.03.06

Kage
September 3rd 2006


1172 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I don't think a review is worthwhile if it doesn't bring something new or unique to the table. And if we're speaking technically here than I guess I shouldn't have negged it for being well-written, because it was well-written.



And there's plenty to bitch about around here these days. You were there back when things were good, King, I guess you just don't remember. :shrugs:

Onewaytrip2hell
September 6th 2006


508 Comments


Great review/votes

FR33L0RD
September 27th 2007


6401 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

King Crimson was always a favorite for me, but this album is simply weak.

Egglord
October 6th 2007


12 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

i don't know what you guys are talking about. I thought this was a great album. Of course not as good as Court or Red, but I thought it was pretty awesome. So what if it was a copy of In the Court? It was still good. This Message Edited On 11.30.07

RevengeSoldier
October 3rd 2008


308 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I'm a sucker for the sound of In The Court, so this was riiiiight up my alley for it being In The Court 2, especially the title track.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy