Jethro Tull
The String Quartets


2.0
poor

Review

by Divaman USER (166 Reviews)
May 22nd, 2017 | 14 replies


Release Date: 2017 | Tracklist

Review Summary: At best, this is a niche album for a very specialized group of Ian Anderson/Jethro Tull fans.

It probably won't come as a shock to many people that in spite of the fact that The String Quartets is being released under the "Jethro Tull" moniker, this isn't really a Jethro Tull album. Instead, it's an LP by Ian Anderson and a classical string quartet, with an occasional assist from Tull keyboard player John O'Hara, performing rearranged versions of a number of Jethro Tull classics. It was released as a Jethro Tull album ... well, to be honest, probably because the label figured it would make more money than it would have if it had simply been released as an Ian Anderson album. And maybe more legitimately, because these are reworked versions of songs that were previously featured on real Jethro Tull albums, even though the names have all been changed (e.g., "Living in the Past" becomes "In the Past", "Aqualung" becomes "Aquafugue", etc.) for purposes of keeping the royalties straight.

The string quartet in question is called The Carducci Quartet, and while I'd never claim to be any kind of an expert in classical music, they do a rather nice job throughout. From what I've read about them, they seem to specialize in performing more modern music -- they recorded an album with composer Philip Glass, for example -- so I guess they were a fairly natural choice for a project like this.

In some ways, the idea of doing this album is logical. As a flautist, Anderson's instrument of choice is a natural for classical music. Several of his solo efforts, especially the all-instrumental Divinities: Twelve Dances With God LP, have certainly flirted with the classical music genre. (In fact, Divinities was released on a classical music label.) Besides, a decent percentage of the Tull repertoire, especially the material from their Songs From the Wood/Heavy Horses period, seems to lend itself comfortably to a classical music treatment. So where does this project go wrong?

Sadly, in a couple of places. Let's start with the vocals. There are twelve songs on The String Quartets. Half are all-instrumental, and half feature vocals. I wish they didn't. It's well known among Tull fans that Anderson's voice has been shot for better than 25 years now. Some sources claim his throat problems began in the mid-'80s during the Under Wraps tour, but they became unmistakably noticeable by the early '90s. He's dealt with them over the years in several ways, including scheduling more instrumental interludes into the band's live sets; singing in a strange, very pronounced way, that often forces him to sing his words just slightly behind the actual music of any given song; and in recent years, by employing a second singer, to spell him when he needs it and to sing the parts he just can't reach anymore. Prior to this album, however, Anderson was always able to mask these deficiencies pretty well on his studio work. No more. On String Quartets, his voice sounds weak and barely on-key. His flute playing is, at times, exquisite here. I just wish he'd chosen not to sing.

The selection of songs on this LP is mostly sensible. Mostly, but not totally. As stated earlier, the Tull material from their Elizabethan/rustic period translates well to a more classical treatment, as do early-period songs such as "Living in the Past", "Sossity, You're a Woman/Reasons for Waiting" and "We Used to Know". (I'm using the original song titles here for clarity). "A Christmas Song" translates well musically, although in this case, I wish they'd done it as an instrumental just because it's always had some of Anderson's worst-ever lyrics. ("So how can you laugh when your own mother's hungry?" Um, who does that, Ian? Name me one person.)

The rearranged "Aqualung" is awful, however, as you might expect when you're trying to translate a hard rock song into an all-strings-and-flute format, and "Locomotive Breath" doesn't fare any better. And while I like the original "Bungle in the Jungle" as much as anyone, this is a song that really gets uplifted by the cleverness of the lyrics. It's so repetitive musically, though, that done instrumentally and in this format, it strays into the realm of elevator music (and poor elevator music, at that).

To make matters worse, the label makes it clear that as far as they're concerned, it's all about sucking a few last bucks out of loyal Jethro Tull fans. They drive this point home by getting the order of the songs wrong on both the back of the CD sleeve and the back of the CD booklet inside, although they do at least manage to get it right on the booklet's inside front cover. Obviously, if they could have grabbed me by my ankles, turned me upside down and shook me to get at my money, they would have. But since my door has good locks, they slapped this album together instead.

I'm not going to say that The String Quartets is completely without merit. If you're a fan of Jethro Tull, and you also like light classical music, it might still be worth your while picking this album up, especially since you never know how much longer Ian Anderson will continue recording and performing. Know what you're buying, though. This is at best a niche album for a very particular kind of Ian Anderson/Jethro Tull fan.



Recent reviews by this author
Aimee Mann Queens of the Summer HotelBlackmore's Night Nature's Light
Runa The Tide of WinterFuture Bible Heroes Eternal Youth
The Smiths ...Best The Smiths Best...
user ratings (20)
2.5
average

Comments:Add a Comment 
SandwichBubble
May 22nd 2017


13796 Comments


"Obviously, if they could have grabbed me by my ankles, turned me upside down and shook me to get at my money, they would have. But since my door has good locks, they slapped this album together instead." Bwahaha

Gonna avoid this. Thanks for the heads up.

butcherboy
May 22nd 2017


9464 Comments


great review as has come to be expected.. shame about the album.. and I like the cheek.. hahahaha

Divaman
May 22nd 2017


16120 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Thanks guys. I don't actually regret buying the album. It doesn't add much to the luster of Tull's history, but I love Tull, and I like light classical music, so there's enough here to make it worthwhile for me. Hate the carelessness of the record company, though. It's insulting that they cared so little as to not proofread their own damned track list.

e210013
May 22nd 2017


5128 Comments


You promised it and you made the review. And I'm very glad that you did it.

However, I must say two things about your review. First, are you sure that the album was released as a Jethtro Tull's album? I say this, because Progarchives put it as solo effort of Anderson. Second, you mentioned that the title tracks probably were changed due to purposes of keeping the royalties straight. I've also some doubts. Why? Because, Anderson had already released before, a solo album with Jethro Tull's tracks, "Ian Anderson Plays The Orchestral Jethro Tull", without change the names of the tracks. I'm also convinced that he perhaps has all the rights of the band.

About the album, I don't know it yet. So, I can't comment it yet. But, from what you wrote and what wrote the solitary reviewer of Progarchives, it seems to me that it has all to be a weak album. Both of you comment that there is no need of the voice of Anderson on the album. And it seems to me an obvious thing. By definition, a string quartet doesn't have voices. So, I took a brief look to You Tube and it seems that I can listen to, at least, some of the tracks. When I have some time I'll do it, surely.

About your review, is great as always. Pos. Nice to see that you reviewed another prog stuff.

Cheers.

Divaman
May 22nd 2017


16120 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Hi e. Yes, weirdly enough, it's released as a Jethro Tull album, although in reality, it really is an Ian Anderson album. And yes, the bit about the royalties comes from Ian himself -- there are some pretty extensive notes from him inside of the CD booklet, and he's the one who said they changed the names slightly because of the royalties. Maybe he had some problems when he did it the other way on "Ian Anderson Plays the Orchestral Jethro Tull", I'm not sure.

e210013
May 22nd 2017


5128 Comments


Ok, it's clear for me right now. Thanks pal.

Divaman
May 22nd 2017


16120 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Any time. I always enjoy hearing your perspective.

Jethro42
May 22nd 2017


18274 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

These vocals, what a waste... We all know about Ian's throat issues...No need to demonstrate us. The idea to introduce a string quartet is not bad. It's a good way to perform Jethro Tull music that merges well with classical after all. And we clearly recognize most of the songs without these weak vocals. I doubt album has any replay value even if some of the songs are really well done.

Really hard to rate.



Good job on the review, mate.

Divaman
May 22nd 2017


16120 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Thanks Jethro. Yes, it's a shame they didn't have the courage to just do the album as an instrumental. The Carducci Quartet is quite good, and if they'd left it with just them plus Ian's flute (and occasional acoustic guitar) and O'Hara's piano, it would have been a stronger album.

TheIntruder
May 22nd 2017


758 Comments


I need to check this.

TwigTW
May 22nd 2017


3934 Comments


This reminds me of when Elvis Costello made that album with the Brodsky Quartet. The idea sounded good on paper, but in reality it wasn't so great... I guess I'll skip this one.

vonseux
May 23rd 2017


363 Comments


milking
milking
milking....

ScuroFantasma
Emeritus
May 23rd 2017


11971 Comments


Fantastic review, absolute pleasure to read. Not at all interested in hearing this album though, does not sound very appealing.

Divaman
May 23rd 2017


16120 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I don't blame you, Scuro. Like I said, unless you're both a Tull fan AND a light classical fan, AND you're willing to overlook Ian's painful vocal problems, you're probably not going to find the album worth your while. Thanks for your kind comments.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy