Metallica
St. Anger


5.0
classic

Review

by fullautorpg USER (6 Reviews)
March 1st, 2017 | 90 replies


Release Date: 2003 | Tracklist

Review Summary: It is better to be remembered in infamy than being good but forgotten.

First things first. The songs on the album are not good by any stretch. I tried to listened to it once recently to do this review and I could not finish it. I’d probably give it a 1-1.5. Sure, the title track isn’t half bad, yet the reason it is a 5 is what St. Anger stands for: how far a beloved band can fall and how its reputation is affected.

Metallica was, in the 80’s on a hot streak. They had released four albums that are highly revered and often considered genre definers. The 90s gave Metallica their difficulties with Load and Reload, but they are at least average. What really hurt fans was a “back to form” album that was announced as St. Anger. A return to the heavier roots and reclaim the fire that was lost during the Load and Reload. This is what happened, if by reclaim the fire meant receive massive backlash from the fans. The snare drum, lack of solos, and taking a hard rock stance drove fans into dismay. Their favorite band gone mainstream, sold out, and are no longer Metallica. Lulu didn’t help them out either.

What makes this album a classic is how it is remembered. Before I was a Metallica fan, I knew about the abomination of St. Anger. I knew that is was considered a sell out before I A.) understood what a sell out was and B.) even listened to their great albums. The butt of many a joke, St. Anger might even be more memorable than many other great albums based on how bad it is.

The reputation that St. Anger has is so horrible that we simply can’t forget about it. Over a decade later, this album continues to receive judgment and criticism. It serves as a case study of the problems of bands going mainstream and trying to please both the fans and the charts.

Remember, classic is defined by recognizable and established value. To recognize the pitfalls of bands working to be mainstream and following up on past success. This album’s value is not its surpassing of musicality but the warning given to bands and listeners. There is value in reputation and how one low can define a fan's expectations of a band.

To summarize, St. Anger is a classic in what it stands for and what it showed the world of music. But as far as quality of music goes, it is quite low.



Recent reviews by this author
Adramelch Lights from OblivionAdramelch Broken History
Slipknot .5: The Gray ChapterLinkin Park The Hunting Party
Sum 41 13 Voices
user ratings (6319)
2
poor
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
fullautorpg
March 1st 2017


113 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

I'd like to state again: the album itself is very bad and I WOULD NOT recommend listening to it. This is simply looking at what it did in the music community.

AlexKzillion
March 1st 2017


17135 Comments


What in the fuck

wham49
March 1st 2017


6341 Comments


just what the world needed

Snake.
March 1st 2017


25250 Comments


literally reported this review

FullOfSounds
March 1st 2017


15821 Comments


Interesting perspective

RobbaqPL
March 1st 2017


187 Comments


Sooooo enough years have passed for hating on St. Anger to become cool again? Instead of being, you know, the most cliched thing you can do other than 5'ing TDAGARIM?

fullautorpg
March 1st 2017


113 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

literally reported this review



Um, why? There is literally nothing worth reporting.

Dedes
Contributing Reviewer
March 1st 2017


9969 Comments


Yeah that's stupid. Although going down in infamy is much worse then "fading out famously" which in itself is contradictory because if your "famous" you are not "fading".

tempest--
March 1st 2017


20634 Comments


great review man, pos

onionbubs
March 1st 2017


20699 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

"To summarize, St. Anger is a classic in what it stands for and what it showed the world of music. But as far as quality of music goes, it is quite low."



what the fuck

StrikeOfTheBeast
March 1st 2017


8382 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Good angle if a [slightly] underwhelming review. I'll pos for the perspective.

SandwichBubble
March 1st 2017


13796 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Notes:

Metallica was, in the 80’s, on a hot streak.

I knew that it was considered a sell out before I...



Really interesting review, I agree with the sentiment somewhat.

rodrigo90
March 1st 2017


7387 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

And I thought the sputnikmusic community hate me because I put a 3.5 to duran duran's big thing. This, on the other hand, is pretty bizarre

rodrigo90
March 1st 2017


7387 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

"3 out of 3 thought this review was well written." Oh my Gosh.

EphemeralEternity
March 1st 2017


4342 Comments


uh those pesky opinions

Dedes
Contributing Reviewer
March 1st 2017


9969 Comments


His perspective is new and interesting even if I disagree with it, don't be a bitch over someone's different opinion.

StrikeOfTheBeast
March 1st 2017


8382 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

What's so bizarre about his view? You can't deny that the hate of this album fuels its popularity even to this day.

rodrigo90
March 1st 2017


7387 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

It's not that I hate the album, my rating might be tricky but frantic, some kind of monster, dirty window, invisible kid, the unnamed feeling and shoot me again are all guilty pleasures

Dedes
Contributing Reviewer
March 1st 2017


9969 Comments


I only listened to a portion of this album a long while back but man I remember really hating Frantic lol.

EphemeralEternity
March 1st 2017


4342 Comments


not only do i disagree with the sentiment but the review itself is written quite appallingly (and i'm gonna go ahead and surmise that it wasn't some deliberate attempt at a meta review)



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy