The Velvet Underground
White Light/White Heat


3.0
good

Review

by doctorjimmy USER (60 Reviews)
February 21st, 2016 | 14 replies


Release Date: 1968 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Looks great on paper, but there is too much musical masturbation getting in the way of actual substance.

An unbelievably influential record, this one. Before 1968, concepts like "noise" and "feedback" were mostly reserved to the likes of the Who and the Jimi Hendrix Experience and even then, restricted as "garnish" to the main dishes. The rest of the music world (as well as the Velvets circa 1967) was enamored in its "beauty quest", painfully oblivious of the possibilities of "ugliness". Add to that the extravagant, dissonant nature of the closing epic and you have an album that defied expectations, rules and time...

The greatest success of the album lies in its atmosphere; forget all about their debut, for this release couldn’t contrast its predecessor in a more obvious way. If Nico was, for the most part, drenched in a world-weary, quirky beauty and had a couple garage rockers and “atonal” jams for variety, this release revels in its ugliness. Truly, the insanely distorted guitars here could make Nigel Tufnel from Spinal Tap proud, as they completely envelop the listener in a murky, misty sonic environment. Formally, the record is poorly produced; the drums are thin and often inaudible, the vocals usually buried in the mix, the playing amateurish and sloppy, but in small doses the approach on this album reaches for the primal instincts and, even if not deeply, hits its target.

Another interesting aspect has to be the lyrics. Whether Lou Reed is dealing with sexual orgies, operations, drug use, or long-distance relationship problems, the descriptions are usually superbly detailed, hilarious and intriguing to observe. After all, he wasn’t (unjustly I might add) named a Dylan imitator for nothing. The following verse speaks for its self:

”Ah, you shouldn't do that
Don't you know you'll hit the carpet
Don't you know you'll mess the carpet
And by the way you've got a dollar”


Thus, any album with these qualities is destined to have a classic or two under its belt; the title track is deservedly lauded for its proto-punk influence, but I’d be hard pressed to call it a punk number per se. The guitars crawl under the thumping bass line and the mostly inanimate drums, giving the song a lazy, laid-back tone than a “burn the house down” vibe; not to mention that the out-of-tune-but-still-charming harmonies and the buried piano lines make it more of a perverted update on some early Stones tune than some fiery punk extravaganza. However, Lady Godiva’s Operation is not any less of a classic itself; featuring a lulling oriental melody over the usual sonic chaos, this one paints itself as a noisier remake of I’ll Be Your Mirror and excels at its quest.

This is where it goes downhill, though; despite its articulate storytelling, The Gift fails to become anything more than a musically enhanced e-book. The instrumentation is the usual “let’s strum three chords and add some solos afterwards” method, serving more as a backdrop for Cale's narration, but the idea of eschewing melody for spoken narration is only worthy on a theoretical level.

Perhaps the major defect is the closing Sister Ray. Of course, it has legions of devotees around the world, but it seems more like a lab experiment than an actual art piece. There are many points of view from which one can judge the song and in all of them, it fails to deliver; as a song, it is melodically average and stale. As a jam, it is painfully one-note and lacking in different sections and variations of the theme. The tempo rises slightly at some point, the organ does it best to spice things up and guitar solos creep in randomly, but even these factors cannot save the song from utter tedium; they don’t even matter. Finally, when looking at what one can gain emotionally, there is nothing to find on a robotic and expressionless escapade that is perfectly happy under its “experimental” tag, but rarely, if ever, says anything substantial.

Unfortunately, the description about the emotional response of Sister Ray applies to everything here. Even the two classics are raw and visceral only superficially, unable to reach primal emotions on a deep level. The whole record sounds like an exercise in style, but with too few musical ideas to make the exercise worthwhile. Mind you, I don’t judge the record for its ugly nature. This was the obvious aim; to make a musical statement that would show the world that beauty is not the only goal when making music. What they actually did, however, was to show that feedback and noise alone will not transform lackluster songwriting and sparse musical ideas into a masterpiece.



Recent reviews by this author
Eric Clapton 461 Ocean BoulevardEric Clapton Eric Clapton
The Rolling Stones Out of Our HeadsThe Animals The Animals (US)
Earth, Wind and Fire That's The Way of The WorldThe Rolling Stones Aftermath
user ratings (1462)
4.2
excellent
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
hesperus
February 21st 2016


1455 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Yeah, this kinda sums up how I feel about the album. I'm sure it was revolutionary in its day, but when I can listen to Spiderland and Leaves Turn Inside You, there's no reason for me to keep this in my library.

Frippertronics
Emeritus
February 21st 2016


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

no.

Ocean of Noise
February 21st 2016


10970 Comments


I can understand where the 3 is coming from, but I completely disagree. This is my second favourite VU, behind the self-titled.

This review is good. Have a pos. It could use some tightening up, though. Try to avoid colloquialisms and words in sentences that don't have to be there.

ZackSh33
February 21st 2016


730 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I really like "The Gift," Cale's voice is just so memorizing





wham49
February 21st 2016


6341 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I tend to agree with the review, not my fave VU, but keeping in perspective, great compared to 90% of the other shit out there

Supercoolguy64
February 21st 2016


11787 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

based on my knowledge reed wrote the gift back when he was in middle school as an assignment and he even read it out loud to his entire class

boy, would I love to see the look on their faces as he did so

doctorjimmy
February 21st 2016


386 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

@LPFTW thanks a lot for the feedback, mate ;) i made the intro like that because I was getting a bit tired of traditional intros having the things i described...in my intro. However, it didn't come quite right, it looks separate from the rest of the review.

One thing, though. I don't think I was ignorant about the bands influence. Specifically, I stated that the title track is deservedly lauded for its influence, but doesn't sound per se like its successors. There's nothing wrong with that. Chuck Berry didn't sound per se like the Stones, that doesn't diminish his influence on them ;)

Good catch about John Cale. Finally, I am going to include the whole "influence" thing on my rewritten intro to balance things out. Thanks again for you time ;)

doctorjimmy
February 21st 2016


386 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

@Ocean of Noise Thanks for the feedback ;) Gonna tighten up a little the review regarding colloquialisms

Tunaboy45
February 21st 2016


18421 Comments


Great review jimmy, this is a pretty amazing album.

Artuma
February 21st 2016


32762 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

yeah this is prolly the band's best

TwigTW
February 22nd 2016


3934 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

It's wild that this came out in the 6os. I would have guessed the 70s . . . I get what you're saying in the review. Some of this has not aged so well (Lady Godiva's Operation), but I still think it's a great album. I like The Gift. I only wish they had mixed the vocals deeper in the guitars. You should correct the Lou Reed/John Cale mistake regarding The Gift. The review is well written except for that error.

TheIntruder
February 22nd 2016


758 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

The review is well written in general, but I disagree with some your opinions and especially with the rating. Anyway, good working. Pos.

JigglyPDiddy
February 22nd 2016


3721 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

The jiggly underground.

doctorjimmy
February 22nd 2016


386 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

finally fixed the cale/lou mistake regarding the gift. dunno why I forgot that. anyway, thanks a lot guys



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy