Ed Sheeran
+


1.5
very poor

Review

by Marijuana Smoking Street Dweller USER (60 Reviews)
September 12th, 2015 | 64 replies


Release Date: 2011 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Simply put, one of the many reasons you shouldn't care about mainstream pop music today.

Ed Sheeran is one of those peculiar cases in modern popular music; he is thought of by young audiences as the ''intelligent'' one, far more creative than the likes of Nicki Minaj, Taylor Swift and the whole army of blank, uninspired artists that comprise the majority of the mainstream music scene today. Moreover, he has constructed a clever public image, that of a humble and friendly singer-songwriter that has no intention other than keeping company to the listener for as long as a record lasts. Hell, he even cites the Beatles and Bob Dylan as some of his major influences! Imagine my disbelief and curiosity before I had the chance of listening to his debut...

...and then, imagine my major disappointment after the record's finale, which is all the more surprising since folk and pop (the two styles mainly explored here) are two genres I dearly love; what's the problem then? To begin with, the production here is awfully generic; whether it'll be a number embellished with pianos, orchestral strings and background chanting like the opening The A Team, an ''energetic'' tune in the style of Drunk or a ''pure folk'' affair like Small Bump, the studio engineers do not have a single clue about personality. Not only all of the songs here sound exactly the same with each other, they also don't bother to distinguish themselves from other artists' efforts. Does One Direction or Sam Smith sound different from Ed Sheeran? Not by a long mile. Even when Ed attempts to do something different, like inserting rock and dance elements on The City, the result isn't really different than other songs here. Simply put, one of the most uniform records I've ever had the misfortune of hearing.

The second obvious defect of the album is the lack of emotional sincerity; Sheeran is simply incapable of putting any real, substantial emotion on the tape, resulting in all of the songs sounding faceless and manufactured. The first reason is the lyrical input, where the songs deal with love, street life, homeless shelters and self-doubt in the most uninspired way possible: stuff like Lights gone, days end, struggling to pay rent, The worst things in life come free to us or The pavement is my friend are downright laughable in their supposed ''direct nature'' and ''rawness''. Another reason is the guy's voice; he sticks with the same irritating formula of the slightly-sensitive-and-slightly-aching vocal delivery on every single song here. Not once does he change his ''whispering'' style in the slightest way possible, resulting in fifty minutes of one monochromatic delivery after the other. Plus, is it only me or he sounds completely fake all the time? I honestly can't take seriously the man's vocal efforts; he employs all these ''sentimental'' and ''emotional'' vocal techniques in such an obvious way that he cannot generate any genuine emotion or stimulate these ears at all.

The most crippling issue of the record, though, has to be the average songwriting; seriously, what was the guy thinking? This is supposed to be a pop record at heart and I can't remember any of the twelve songs presented here. Most of the time, he seems stuck between folk-meets-soul melodies that have no substantial catchiness in them; it's just endless, pointless vocal ''noodling'', with little or no attention paid to memorability whatsoever. The only way in which you can deem these songs as good, from a melodic viewpoint, is if you haven't heard a pop song in your whole life. What's even more, all of the songs are needlessly overlengthened for no particular reason, resulting in a seriously overlong record that closes with the eight minute borefest Give Me Love/ The Parting Glass. Could this album be any more of a disaster?

In conclusion, this is one mighty poor release from every point of view. Generic production, sterile emotional investment, minimal songwriting efforts and a uniquely bland voice that has no intention of changing at all. Ed Sheeran is the absolute proof that hanging a guitar on your body, adopting a ''vulnerable'' vocal tone and writing laughable, simplistic lyrics is not enough to guarantee success. Well, certainly not artistic success, since he is pretty big commercially, but who told you that society and common sense go hand in hand?



Recent reviews by this author
Eric Clapton 461 Ocean BoulevardEric Clapton Eric Clapton
The Rolling Stones Out of Our HeadsThe Animals The Animals (US)
Earth, Wind & Fire That's The Way of The WorldThe Rolling Stones Aftermath
user ratings (320)
Chart.
2.9
good
other reviews of this album
Ali (2.5)
A true talent wasted on bed-wetting music....

Scott M. Baldwin (2.5)
Sheeran's soothing voice and occasionally obvious acoustic chops can't make up for predictable music...

Lincoln Green (3)
A disappointing debut from an excellent live performer....

related reviews

x

รท

Comments:Add a Comment 
treeqt.
September 12th 2015


16889 Comments


euphoria running wild

Tunaboy45
September 12th 2015


15496 Comments


Need to drink more starbucks before I can pos this review

Digging: The National - Sleep Well Beast

doctorjimmy
September 12th 2015


386 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

LOL with both of your comments :p thanks for reading, guys ;)

Cygnatti
September 12th 2015


31798 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Simply put, one of the many reasons few care about mainstream music today.
dude you're fuckin' daft

Pangea
September 12th 2015


2697 Comments


The A Team is a fantastic song

wtferrothorn
Contributing Reviewer
September 12th 2015


5718 Comments


@Cyg He obviously hasn't heard the new Carly Rae

Cygnatti
September 12th 2015


31798 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Ed Sheeran is one of those peculiar cases in modern popular music; he is thought of by young audiences as the ''intelligent'' one, far more creative than the likes of Nicki Minaj, Taylor Swift and the whole army of blank, uninspired artists that comprise the majority of the mainstream music scene today... Imagine my expectations before I had the chance of listening to his debut...
jfc

Asdfp277
September 12th 2015


15102 Comments


All he said about him is right tho

but "Imagine my expectations before I had the chance of listening to his debut" is dumb af imo

Cygnatti
September 12th 2015


31798 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Simply put, one of the many reasons few care about mainstream music today.

ed sheeran - a team = 135 million views

taylor swift - shake it off = 1.036 billion views

major lazor+dj snake - lean on = 521 million view
few people, huh?

BMDrummer
September 12th 2015


13942 Comments


ok cyg thanks for the contribution

Cygnatti
September 12th 2015


31798 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

you're very welcome bruh

doctorjimmy
September 12th 2015


386 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

@Cygnatti when i say ''few care'' i mean few people in sites like this one, that specialize in alternative/indie records and bands. Of course mainstream music has millions of people, that's why its called ''mainstream''.

@Asdfp277 It kinda reads awkardly, I agree. Could you make any suggestions in polishing that sentence?

Thanks for the feedback guys ;)



Asdfp277
September 12th 2015


15102 Comments


doctor: don't make it sound like you're actually buying the facade, since you wrote it like it's some insincere marketing ploy and expectations coming from naivete

or somethin

doctorjimmy
September 12th 2015


386 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

@Asdfp277 Hmm, yeah that's a more interesting perspective, thanks ;)

Funeralopolis
September 12th 2015


14065 Comments


X is much better than this, Wake Me Up is pure cringeworthy

Digging: Belphegor - Totenritual

Cygnatti
September 12th 2015


31798 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

@Cygnatti when i say ''few care'' i mean few people in sites like this one, that specialize in alternative/indie records and bands. Of course mainstream music has millions of people, that's why its called ''mainstream''.
then specify that.

Asdfp277
September 12th 2015


15102 Comments


yeah it's also important to state what you mean

not bluntly but the text must convey what you wanted to say, y'know?

Funeralopolis
September 12th 2015


14065 Comments


Agreed its not even remotely clear you would mean that, nobody would ever assume that

doctorjimmy
September 12th 2015


386 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Yeah, the summary sounds...pretentious to say the least I can't figure out how to rephrase it though...

LotusFlower
September 12th 2015


12002 Comments


Discout Justin Timberlake



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2017 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy