The Rolling Stones
The Rolling Stones


4.0
excellent

Review

by doctorjimmy USER (60 Reviews)
August 17th, 2015 | 9 replies


Release Date: 1964 | Tracklist

Review Summary: A fantastic, influential debut that, despite some weaker moments, offers a clear look at the early Rolling Stones.

Back in the early 60's the Rolling Stones were a bunch of nobodies to the main public. Playing gigs at venues like Marquee Club and Crawdaddy Club, they were slowly becoming an underground sensation with a few singles here and there, as opposed to the Beatlemania that surrounded those Liverpool lads. In 1964, though, the Stones were given a chance by Decca Records, which has previously rejected the Beatles, much to their afterward grief, to prove their talents on record. The songwriting machine of Jagger/Richards was still in its infancy, though, and their debut features only three originals and plenty of covers.

And what covers! Boasting a powerhouse of classic R&B, rock'n'roll and blues tunes like Carol and I'm A King Bee, the boys simply can do no wrong here. The atmosphere is raw, edgy and the members themselves play the classics with the utmost conviction. Richards is Chuck Berry's incarnation, but even more aggressive in his playing, Brian Jones plays the hell out of his harmonica and brings some mighty biting slide guitar to the table; as for Jagger, he develops a unique singing voice that's not 'sore' and 'aching' like his blues idols neither 'jovial' and 'relaxed' as his rock'n'roll prototypes. He is more 'nasty' in his approach, combining successfully the dark, unpolished nature of say, Muddy Waters with the more snappy delivery of someone like Chuck Berry. But what about the rhythm section, now? Charlie and Bill are swinging effortlessly through all the songs, whether it's something fast paced like I Just want to Make Love To You or something slower and cooler like Honest I Do.

Truly, it is the amalgam of all these factors that makes this record so fantastic. Thus, the straightening of the rhythm section in Route 66 may not be the single most inventive idea in the history of mankind, but it brings to the surface a terrific tension that Chuck Berry's rendition lacked by a long mile. Add to that Mick's 'dirty' delivery, as well as Keith's and Brian's fierce 'guitar weaving' and you have yourself a terrific opener. Listen to Chuck's take and tell me the boys weren't cooking something different here. The other rip-roaring rocker is Carol which, of course, features even more drive and aggressiveness than Berry's original and succeeds just as much as the album opener in offering pure rock energy to the listener. The brisk, rapid rhythm section makes one more appearance in I Just Wanna Make Love To You; this time the song is not a rocker in the traditional sense of the term, but they manage to transform Waters' original from a menacing blues tune to a savage R&B attack in offhand fashion.

As for the slower, bluesy songs, the clear winner is I'm A King Bee, which converts Slim Harpo's tune from a great mid-tempo blues shuffle to a sweaty, sly and lively R&B number. Jagger is at his nasty best here, never overdoing his performance with the barks and forced 'punkisms' that would litter the Stones' mid-seventies live shows and 80's studio releases, Charlie and Bill create a bouncy, energetic backbone that improves upon the original's rhythm section and of course Brian's mighty slide lines are among the best things he ever did with the band. He bursts through the speakers with a fierce bite, completing Jagger's attack earlier and after his solo. Honest I Do is not as fantastic as the aforementioned tune, but it is still a jolly good track even if less amped-up and edgy, mostly due to Mick's more 'tender', if the word is applicable, performance and the less frenzied nature of the rhythm section.

Mona (I Need You Baby) improves upon the rhythm section of Diddley's original and is made all the more of a highlight thanks to Jagger's energetic performance and Richard's distorted guitar playing that might not twist the feeling and vibe of the song as much as the other tracks do, but still delivers the inimitable sound of the Stones. Walking The Dog closes the record on a groovy fashion, summing up what the album is all about perfectly. Unfortunately, there are a couple of weaker renditions here that mar the picture a bit, namely Can I Get A Witness and You Can Make It If You Try. These two tunes require powerful soul voices in order to be fully adequate; Jagger is simply not a soul crooner and he never became one, by the way; the soul efforts of the band while instrumentally great, were always lacking in the singing department. This is what happens here, too, as these songs never become something more than by-the-numbers soul tunes.

Now, we're left with the originals; two out of three are very good. Little By Little is your typical R&B blues number melodically and is made notable by the strength of the instruments and Mick's very nice little by little i'm losing my love for you hook. Tell Me is the first sign of pop songwriting by the Glimmer Twins and, while not as sincere as the Stones best ballads, is solidly written and enveloped in the youthful innocence that was uncharacteristic of the Stones at the time. Now I've Got A Witness is the worst cut on the record, a boring and uninspired instrumental based on Can I Get A Witness that serves as nothing more than a two minute filler. Thank God it's short because otherwise the rating would be lower.

And, since I made a reference to the Beatles earlier, let me just say that this is a far more impressive debut than the Beatles’ Please Please Me, even if it features only 3 original tunes. The Stones already offer a more convincing, solid picture of who they were at the time, unlike the Beatles, who perfected their ‘pure pop’ sound with A Hard Day’s Night, not their debut.

So, there you have it. This is the quintessential R&B experience of the early/mid 60's, simply because the Stones are not just covering old classics; they're infusing rock'n'roll energy with blues rawness, as well as their energetic collective sound with tremendous results. Make no mistake, this record is the birth of rock as we know it today, because it introduces the ‘nastiness’ element that made its way through every rock band ever since, be it the Who, the Kinks, the Beatles, AC/DC, Led Zeppelin and so on. So, be sure to check it out.



Recent reviews by this author
Eric Clapton 461 Ocean BoulevardEric Clapton Eric Clapton
The Rolling Stones Out of Our HeadsThe Animals The Animals (US)
Earth, Wind and Fire That's The Way of The WorldThe Rolling Stones Aftermath
user ratings (302)
3.3
great


Comments:Add a Comment 
SharkTooth
August 17th 2015


14920 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Nice to see someone else's reviewing this!

SharkTooth
August 17th 2015


14920 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

The bolding of band/album titles is still kinda annoying but this is a really well written review, also it reminds me to get on with reviewing The Rolling Stones No. 2

doctorjimmy
August 17th 2015


386 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Thanks a lot SharkTooth. As for the second stones album, write one already! this site needs more reviews for the stones, be sure of that ;)

Atari
Staff Reviewer
August 18th 2015


27941 Comments


this site needs more reviews for the stones [2]

i dig your taste sir.

doctorjimmy
August 18th 2015


386 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

You're welcome Atari ;) Feel free to add your own reviews anytime, the stones page needs a lot of work.

Maladjusted
August 19th 2015


120 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I dont think they perfect something here, they give an edgier and aggressive sound to rock.I disagree with you about the Beatles debut though

doctorjimmy
August 19th 2015


386 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

@Maladjusted They perfect their R&B period and it's pretty obvious; it's another thing if you don't like R&B, though

Maladjusted
August 19th 2015


120 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

They play covers of blues songs,what exactly they perfected ?? All the 60s rock bands began covering blues songs,What's the difference i dont get it.I enjoyed their style of playing though

doctorjimmy
August 20th 2015


386 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Let me explain you once more. Take a pop cover off the Beatles debut like Boys or Anna. Both are good, but essentially pointless covers of older songs with little or no improvement over the originals in terms of atmosphere, direction and vibe. Now take berry's or harpo's originals off this album and compare them with the stones' take. The difference is stated on my review.

What is more, if someone asked me to compile, say, a 25 track compilation of the pure pop (Please Me-Help) period of the beatles (normally 5 tracks each album) the debut would have the fewest entries (Standing There, Please Me, Twist And Shout, Misery). The rest should be from the other albums and mainly from A Hard Day's Night.

Now, if someone asked me to compile a best-of for the Stones early period (everything before Aftermath) the debut would have the most entries (Route 66, Carol, Make Love To You, King Bee, Mona, Walking The Dog, even Tell Me would be in). That's the point I'm making here



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy