Tool
Lateralus


1.5
very poor

Review

by UnpopularOpinion USER (2 Reviews)
December 28th, 2014 | 78 replies


Release Date: 2001 | Tracklist

Review Summary: No light at the end of the tunnel.

The initial guitar twangs fade to silence ever so subtly arising a sense of tension, suspense and wonder. A softer, lighter guitar rhythm ensues, filling the cavernous regions of even the most tone deaf of ears. It was at this point in 'Patient' when I started to wonder what I had sold myself here and more importantly, what was to come from none other than Tool's Lateralus. I was once told of its genius, it's amazing mathematical properties relating to the fibonacci sequence that was well and truly beyond the average listener; on paper, this sets itself up to be masterpiece. It's been months since that experience and here I still stand, confused at why I can't enjoy such a thing. Perhaps I just don't get it.

Or alternatively, maybe Lateralus Is in fact far too ambitious and ultimately fails to deliver.

What is unquestionable about their endeavours is their musical prowess. For instance, the bass riff from 'Schism' exemplifies this, with technical ability of skill and extensive knowledge of time signature manipulation. It's even harder to pretend that this isn't a regular occurrence. The entire album is admirable in its effort to balance itself out giving a nice distribution of heaviness and softness. In the long run, however, these characteristics are completely irrelevant when imminent flaws are plentiful.

Aside from a handful of riffs and melodies, Lateralus is strikingly unmemorable. Nothing truly stands out across its total run time of almost 80 minutes and this is a bother for an album of such length. Any album of 80 minutes should boast a plethora of astoundingly incredible moments but as the manic sounds of 'faaip de oiad' cut to black, one can't help but think that they were somewhat cheated. Too much of this album sounds alike; the guitar tone, bass tone and drums sound equally as bland offering little variety. Due to the length of the album, this becomes an immense problem as it becomes difficult to distinguish one song from one another as the thick, dense distorted chord rarely changes. What makes matters worse is that this, especially, is the kind of thing best listened to as a whole but with such little sonic variation, it simply becomes boring extremely quickly. To its credit, it does enhance the feeling that all songs are part of a bigger entity but it leaves far too much to be desired after a whole run through.

Following in this monotonous, bland suit are the vocals. It must be said that they add to the inevitable downfall in this with its dreary tone, lacklustre and mediocre melodies and only encourages the stale, one lifeless atmosphere the instrumentation already do a good enough job at creating. Just like the instrumentation, there's little to be remembered. There is more variety to feast upon, with Maynard James Keenan using whisper like vocals and sometimes a scream but none of it is particularly interesting as the delivery is lazy and soulless. However, I seem to be under the impression that the quiet, whisper like vocals accompanied with a more intense, furious section is supposed to portray delayed gratification. It's a common theme, with many songs starting quiet before releasing its culmination of everything that the song was building up to be. There's nothing inherently wrong with delayed gratification and can be used very powerfully when executed in the right manner but this is ultimately where Tool's ambition proves to be too much. To put simply, there is no high in this with the loud sections being nothing worth clamouring about in the slightest. It promises so much with its frequent, almost silent interludes but sadly fails to deliver each time. If there is theoretically a high, it's impossible to tell the difference due to the monotony of the vocals and instrumentation, as stated above. And without a high, all the waiting feels too drawn out for its own good, once again adding to its incapability of anything engaging. It truly is a tale of waiting for the light that never came.

In the grand scheme of things, these faults permanently tarnish what could have been a phenomenal record. The lack of vibrancy and energy is costly however, and instead feels very one dimensional, repetitive and nothing to look forward to on repeated listens. Not being able to tell the difference 10, 40 and 70 minutes in honestly detrimental and frustrating too. Whilst I acknowledge that there are more angles of looking at this, such as its undeniably good lyrics, without a foundation to stand on it's not going to make this album a better listen in the slightest and that's its truest flaw. It's certainly admirable but after the 80 minutes it had to offer, I'm still right here as bored as ever.


user ratings (7246)
4.5
superb
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
UnpopularOpinion
December 28th 2014


26 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

I'm back, bitches

Tunaboy45
December 28th 2014


18421 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Holy shit

Wish You were Here and now this. You're on a rampage.

UnpopularOpinion
December 28th 2014


26 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

To, of course, bring mediocre reviews

UnpopularOpinion
December 28th 2014


26 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Hey, at least read the thing

Tunaboy45
December 28th 2014


18421 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Didn't need to.





(Haven't given it a pos or neg, that sort of defeats the point of the review. Anyway, you and me both

know this is going to get neg'd to hell)

UnpopularOpinion
December 28th 2014


26 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Insta neg instead? pfffff

YakNips
December 28th 2014


20097 Comments


you are such an idiot

danielcardoso
December 28th 2014


11770 Comments


Inb4 shitstorm.

Havey
December 28th 2014


12061 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

tunaboy sucks

Slozio
December 28th 2014


44 Comments


"you are such an idiot"

Pretty much sums up the entire community here

On that note, great review. Haven't listened to this but I have seen this record get panned

YakNips
December 28th 2014


20097 Comments


shut up ryan

TheSonomaDude
December 28th 2014


9060 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

99% of the panning this album gets usually consists of "Tool are too pretentious, like 'ohh look at us use these weird time signatures, arent we smart?'"

ItchyEatAss
December 28th 2014


48 Comments


why don't you ~get the fuck out of here~ and take a long hard look at your 5s before making another post on this website

UnpopularOpinion
December 28th 2014


26 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

This review is actually trying unlike the pink floyd one :p

UnpopularOpinion
December 28th 2014


26 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Also, i didn't once say they were pretentious, @sonoma

NeroCorleone80
December 28th 2014


34618 Comments


How come this review started as a 1

UnpopularOpinion
December 28th 2014


26 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

I pressed the wrong button

SharkTooth
December 28th 2014


14921 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

...maybe Lateralus Is in fact...

"is" is capitalized

RadicalEd
December 28th 2014


9546 Comments


these reviews are a maturity test for the sputnik community.... because they are decently written....







....then again you called "Wish you were here" a lazily written song...

420YoloSwag420
December 29th 2014


65 Comments


controversial review? You got my interest
Any album of 80 minutes should boast a plethora of astoundingly incredible moments

how do you know that's true?

as the manic sounds of 'faaip de oiad' cut to black, one can't help but think that they
were somewhat cheated.


capitalize dat shit

It must be said that they add to the inevitable downfall in this with its dreary
tone, lacklustre and mediocre melodies and only encourages the stale, one lifeless
atmosphere the instrumentation already do a good enough job at creating.


1.vocals are a plural subject, as you acknowledged by using "they", but you also need to change
"its" to "their".

2."lacklustre and mediocre"-redundant and redundant,

delete one of those words
(btw I now know you don't live in the States by the way you spell 'lackluster')

"only encourages the stale, one lifeless atmosphere the instrumentation already do a good enough
job at creating."


I also don't think English is your first language anyway 'cuz I have no idea what the fuck you're
saying here

Just like the instrumentation, there's little to be remembered.
little to be remembered where? this sentence has no subject and therefore is saying
absolutely nothing

It's a common theme, with many songs starting quiet before releasing its culmination of
everything that the song was building up to be.


plural subject(songs) so change "its" to "their" and "song was" to "songs were"

The lack of vibrancy and energy is costly however, and instead feels very one dimensional,
repetitive and nothing to look forward to on repeated listens.


you're saying the lack of vibrancy and energy is what "feels very one dimensional, repetitive
and nothing to look forward to on repeated listens.", I'm quite sure you were meaning to describe
the album

Not being able to tell the difference 10, 40 and 70 minutes in honestly detrimental and
frustrating too.

change "in" to "is" and delete the "too"

review's okay, not bad but not anything noteworthy either imo



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy