">
 

Westlife
World Of Our Own


0.5

Review

by Pedro B. USER (364 Reviews)
April 28th, 2006 | 26 replies


Release Date: 2001 | Tracklist


May 4, 2001

Dear diary:

I’m really excited about the prospect of this new album. The brainstorming meetings have spawned some really neat ideas, and I can’t wait to start putting them into practice.
First off, we’re all gonna change our image so that we can look like 5ive. Actually, Bryan says we should rip off their album cover, too. I think that’s neat, y’know, ‘cause they have success and all that, and we need to be able to join the Big Leagues.

Yeah, I know - we’re Irish, not American. We’ll never be able to compete, right? Wrong! Bryan said the producer had said that all we need to do is sing in an American accent, and no one will notice. We’ll be fine. Plus, Bry is now reading the «Boysband Guide To Success», and he says we can make it through with some Americanized drum machines and backing tracks.

Plus, Steve Kipner’s gone to Sweden again to talk to some more of their songwriters. Swedes are the best songwriters ever! I’ve been thinking long and hard and I think I know how they do it. The thing is, they’re sitting there trying to write a song, right? So they look over at their bedroom and there’s this whopping blonde Swedish girl in her lingerie. Naturally, the songs write themselves. Genius, ain’t it?

Of course, Bry is helping to write some of the songs himself…or so they claim. For my money, it’s just a scam to sell more records. The only work I’ve seen Bryan do lately is trying to decide whether to take Amber or Tammy to the dance next Sunday. (I think he should take ‘em both). Mostly, the songs are being written in Sweden, and I don’t really know much about them.

One thing that really gets in my nerves is how Bryan won’t let the rest of us sing. It’s kinda frustrating, really. Especially since I was the one who started the group in the first place. But as long as we score some birds, it’s OK with me, boyo.

Love, Shane

PS: The first MP3 just came in. I’m holding my breath…


December 4, 2001

Dear Diary:

The album sucks! Bryan and Steve have managed to ruin everything yet again. Every damn song sounds the same to me – apart from a couple of uptempos, they’re all lovey-dovey ballads. And even the uptempos sound just like some Backstreet Boys b-side rip-off. Surprisingly, there’s a couple songs I liked in there. The first track, Queen Of My Heart, is great! It’s a kind of country-type ballad, very quiet, and I think they really used a band in that one. I personally could have done without the keyboards, but that’s OK.

If only the rest of the album was that good! If Your Heart’s Not In It is passable as well, a sort of icky, plastic ballad, but at least it has a decent chorus. The other 15 songs, however, are pure unadulterated trite. Why do we even need 17 songs anyway? I know boyband albums are supposed to be long and tiredsome (it says so on chapter 2 of «The Boyband Guide»), but couldn’t we maybe, like, make a difference? Personally, I grew tired halfway through the album. My interest just kinda…went yanno? I found myself thinking about Stacy from the coffee shop, and about that hot outfit she wore the other day…they had to snap me out of it.

Another sucky aspect is that my voice is heard in, like, two songs, for about ten seconds. Bryan’s always hogging the mike, blah blah blah, won’t let the others do anything…it’s sooooo unfair! How are we supposed to get chicks this way?!

Anyway, as you might have noticed, I hate the album. It’s going out today anyway, there’s nothing I can do about it, but I truly think it sucks. And so, I think, will everybody else. We’ll see.

Love, Shane


NOTE: OH YEAH; I finally managed to rate an album 0,5/5!! (BB)



Recent reviews by this author
Green Day SaviorsMetallica 72 Seasons
Black Math Horseman Black Math HorsemanBlack Math Horseman Wyllt
Slipknot The End, So FarPixies Doggerel
user ratings (32)
1.8
poor


Comments:Add a Comment 
Zesty Mordant
April 28th 2006


1196 Comments


cool format, but it seems to be more of a full-out attack on an obviously easy-target than a review.
And how is this rated 0.5? I thought 1 was the lowest rating on this site.

morrissey
Moderator
April 28th 2006


1688 Comments


[quote=Sylvia]You shouldn't try so hard to be funny, it means you forget to review the music.[/quote]
I completely agree.
Also, there is no way in hell this is a 0.5/5. Give me a break.

jimay333
April 28th 2006


433 Comments


i thought it was different

morrissey
Moderator
April 28th 2006


1688 Comments


wait that's Mark. Shane is the one that sang all the songs.

That's what I thought...

fisky009
April 28th 2006


813 Comments


Looks like one of them concept reviews. Meh ok I guess.

Westlife are taall thats wrong with life.

Bron-Yr-Aur
April 28th 2006


4405 Comments


Rather humorous, yet you should have paid more attention to the music. Interesting idea though, so I'm voting yes for this.

spoon_of_grimbo
April 28th 2006


2241 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

haha. this band suck arse, and i know, cuz i hear them all the fucking time thanks to my mother and her obsession with them.

Zebra
Moderator
April 28th 2006


2647 Comments


Your review was pretty humorous, but it was lacking major detail. You only talked about a few songs and there was too much humor and not enough review.
I've only heard Queen of My Heart and it was awesome . I'll have to download a few tracks off of this to see if it was misleading or if the rest of the album lives up to it.

Zesty Mordant
April 28th 2006


1196 Comments


this is such a pitchfork review

santi3hg
April 28th 2006


440 Comments


Spat, you seem to know something about every band alive? How so?

metallicaman8
April 28th 2006


4677 Comments


Are these guys like a rip off of the backstreet boys or sumthin? I've never heard of em

Liberi Fatali
Emeritus
April 29th 2006


1618 Comments


I think the format was interesting, and if fiddled around with, it could produce a wicked review.

However I think you made a mess of this review. I didn't laugh, I wasn't entertained, and I think I knew more about the album before reading this than after.

Two-Headed Boy
April 29th 2006


4527 Comments


How does this review remind me of my old Rolling Stones review?

Oh yeah. It's supposed to be "creative". Though it was decently written, you really could've done better. This review could've really been fined down to two words, as I'm reading it over.

"Pop sucks".

Good effort though.

Kyle71
April 29th 2006


19 Comments


Nice review, but you should have dissed them a bit more.

ReturnToRock
May 2nd 2006


4805 Comments

Album Rating: 0.5

i was sort of disappointed with it myself...how can i erase it?



MyRamona
May 2nd 2006


1098 Comments


They were the next Boyzone back in the day; that's all you should need to know.


I would rather listen to Boyzone for a year than listen to these guys for a week. Nothing about them is unique or special. Alright article for knocking boybands, but not a very good review.

i was sort of disappointed with it myself...how can i erase it?


Why don't you just edit it so you talk about the actual tracks?
This Message Edited On 05.02.06

ReturnToRock
May 2nd 2006


4805 Comments

Album Rating: 0.5

i was disappointed after i saw it posted.



i'll rewrite it in a serious style.

111mike
May 16th 2006


15 Comments


The title track is by far the best.

Med57
Moderator
May 16th 2006


1002 Comments


If you want this deleted, ask here

Horrorshow34
November 20th 2006


110 Comments


5 users have given this record a bad rating . . . I'd bet anyone here a good ten quid that only two of those people have actually heard the record. Though to be honest it probablly does suck ass.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy