Mudvayne
Lost and Found

OK dude, you need to slow down. This is not a review. It says absolutely nothing about the album. You don't explain why you liked something or didn't like something and you don't expand on the qualities/inconsistencies of the music. Thus, there is no point to this review.

pssh, I've written a review in 2mins, with my elbows.

T.V Radio happens to be one of my favs wtf!

I'm willing to bet that this guy is cranking out another review like this as we speak.

Or Mesmerize. Or Nevermind. Wouldnt that be hot?

I vote last 2 reviews get deleted :-).This Message Edited On 04.26.06

All of your reviews so far are absolutely terrible. Hopefully you'll be banned soon.

Regarding the album, it's on par with The End of All Things to Come and less interesting than L.D. 50. There's a few catchy songs here, but overall it's nothing special.

No offense dude, but this should be submitted as a blurb. You need more depth, instead of just going off with "oh yeah, this song is cool" followed by "well this song sucks". You should talk more about how the music makes you feel and the overall mood of it. Also, talk about how the instruments and vocals all blend together. You forgot to rate some songs as well. :rolleyes:
[quote=slack]All of your reviews so far are absolutely terrible. Hopefully you'll be banned soon.[/quote]
Lay off. That won't help him write better reviews. You can't get banned for writing bad reviews (can you?). Those comments will probably get yourself banned (can they?).
I'll agree with you, Mudvayne216, on something, however. Happy? IS a really catchy song.

Slack, you're probbly going to get yourself in a spot of trouble for that. Regardless of how bad his reviews are, you don't wish that on a guy who hasn't personally insulted you.

He started his Lateralus review with "Fuck You All", therefore it was gone. This one is harmless, except aesthetically.This Message Edited On 04.26.06

Album Rating: 2.5

Hm, pretty bad review, just like the album. It had so much potential and so much to live up to after L.D. 50 and just fell flat on its face.

Album Rating: 4.0

dude this type of reviews make me so fuckin mad because i wrote a review for mago de oz and it was like 1000000 times better than this one and it wasnt alowed!!!!!!!!!!, and this one was, also there is a similar review for L.D. 50 and it was allowed to, i mean come on WHY WASNT MY REVIEW ACCEPTED!!!!!!!!!!!!

......

......
(cont)

Dude, the lack of content and effort in your review is summarised in the last song review. You spelt the song name wrong!!! Com'n man..... more EFFORT!!

Album Rating: 2.5

This album kinda sucked. But it was ok. Not something id listen to alot.

i know i shouldnt be saying anything since my reviews are pretty crap anyway, but this review is really really boring and doesnt explain the album at all.

Album Rating: 3.0

^thank you,



Mudvayne216 you need to slow down and explain the musical content (like the gutiar and bass, lyrics) and not what you think about the song. i dont pay you to think, and in fact i dont pay you at all. ---- Count it!

"This song sucks. I dont even want to write about it, "

I think it's more along the lines of:

This REVIEW sucks. I don't even want to READ it.This Message Edited On 06.10.06

Terrible review

This song sucks. I dont even want to write about it

Album Rating: 2.0

I'm going to shift from review bashing to Lost and Found bashing, and say this album was pretty terrible. But the review was pretty awful. Good job.