Chevelle
This Type Of Thinking (Could Do Us In)


3.0
good

Review

by Toondude USER (77 Reviews)
October 31st, 2014 | 19 replies


Release Date: 2004 | Tracklist

Review Summary: It seems as if Chevelle didn't put as much thought into this record as it claims. Whatever the case, it's still not that great.

Chevelle was everything that a mainstream band should be. They were heavy, yet they had variety; and they had excellent musicianship, offering a more accessible sound that resembled the likes of Tool, Deftones, and whatnot. With the rousing success of their last album, it was probably no doubt that people were more than excited to see what else Chevelle had up their sleeve. When This Type of Thinking (Could Do Us In) came out, audiences were singing its praise, claiming that it was even better than Wonder What’s Next. But was it really? Sure it’s heavier than their last two records and it does offer some neat hooks, but that’s really all that this record is; a heavier Chevelle album with a few catchy rhythms to grab the listener’s attention. All in all, there’s very little substance to be found in this album. That’s not to say that this album is bad, it’s just not great.

Quite possibly the biggest issue on This Type of Thinking is its immense lack of variety. Yeah there are tempo changes, but when you have songs that rely on the same guitar riffs over and over again, it gets boring very easily. The songs are indistinguishable, sounding the same almost every time the next song plays. The instruments feel too relaxed in their own comfort, relying on similar tempos which results in a lack energy throughout most of the album. Songs like ‘To Return’ feel drained of its energy right from the beginning, and ‘Still Running’ does nothing more than repeat the same lyrical lines and riffs over and over again that just feels lifeless and lazy. The album as a whole has this problem and makes it a tough pill to swallow in one sitting.

The next big issue with this album is its lack of originality. The production feels flat and sometimes unfocused. The drumming and guitar work doesn’t contain what made Wonder What’s Next feel fresh and new. This album has more in common with something bands such as Three Days Grace or 12 Stones would create, both of which have even more dificulty with this issue. Most of this record feels like Chevelle recycled several of other bands’ (as well as their own) ideas, relying on half-hearted attempts at fitting in with more successful (albeit even less varied) bands that seem to hold similar ideas and throw them out at people like clockwork.

However, if there is one thing about this album that saves this record from being a total waste of time, it has to be Peter Loeffler’s vocals. He is the absolute star in the whole record as he practically kills it every time his voice is present (in a good way mind you). Granted he can’t save all of the songs from their laziness, but it’s during those moments when the band lets Pete become the front-runner when it becomes worth it in the end. He brings out the best in the album, particularly songs such as ‘The Clincher’ and ‘Vitamin R,’ both songs being the best on the record. Perhaps another good thing about this album is that despite its lack of energy, the album still knows how to bring out catchy melodies. ‘The Clincher,’ ‘Vitamin R,’ and the last two songs ironically enough are the only songs on the album in which the band as a whole seems to fully commit to themselves, and the result is absolutely fantastic. These songs do what the band most likely tried to accomplish in this record. They are catchy, well-written, and contain the most passion and drive in the album.

Again, This Type of Thinking isn't bad, it just doesn’t bring out the energy and passion that made Chevelle's last album as good as it was. By all means, Wonder What’s Next wasn’t the greatest album of all time, but it was mainstream rock done right. It felt original and ideal, and it did well as a result. This on the other hand almost goes the exact opposite direction. It feels like another typical mainstream rock album that we’ve already heard several times. It may not necessarily be a bad thing, but comparing it to Wonder What’s Next, as well as their later albums, it’s just about as plain as it could be.



Recent reviews by this author
Periphery Periphery V: Djent is Not a GenreIn Flames Foregone
Shinedown Planet ZeroEvanescence The Bitter Truth
Starset DivisionsKamelot The Shadow Theory
user ratings (1570)
3.8
excellent
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Toondude10
October 31st 2014


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Sorry fti...



I'm probably going to get a bit of hate for this, but I really do think this album is overrated as fuck. Still though, I really do enjoy The Clincher a lot.



Constructive criticism is appreciated.

Jots
Emeritus
October 31st 2014


7561 Comments


The first sentence of your concluding paragraph is missing something
Will read later

Toondude10
October 31st 2014


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Oh oops XD Thanks for pointing that out

Toondude10
October 31st 2014


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I almost gave this a 2.5 earlier until I decided to listen to it again. Last two songs are pretty good though.

Supercoolguy64
October 31st 2014


11786 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

CAAUSE HE'S AAAAAAALLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONE

Mongi123
October 31st 2014


22034 Comments


Nice read man have a pos!

Toondude10
October 31st 2014


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Yay!

Jots
Emeritus
November 1st 2014


7561 Comments


alright man, got some input:

-I think a lot of your sentences could be trimmed down without sacrificing content. I'm not gonna list every example I see, but here's one: "they had excellent musicianship, and of course they offered a more accessible way of bringing out a sound that pretty much resembled the likes of Tool, Deftones, and whatnot." you could probably cut this down to half the length, and say the same thing.

-there's also a couple of redundant sentences. example: "Again, This Type of Thinking isn't a terrible record; in fact it’s not even bad" - isn't terrible = isn't bad. no need to repeat this.
"already heard several times beforehand" - the 'beforehand' is redundant here as well

Toondude10
November 1st 2014


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Okay, thanks for the feedback.

StKiyo
November 1st 2014


385 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Pos'd. I'm doing a Chevelle discography review, and my thoughts about this are very similar.

Toondude10
November 1st 2014


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Thanks, and good luck on that.

ScuroFantasma
Emeritus
November 1st 2014


11967 Comments


Great review Toondude, pos'd. Few small things I noticed:

"And when This Type of Thinking (Could Do Us In) came out, audiences were singing praise about it, claiming how it was even better than Wonder What’s Next."

Get rid of 'and' since it's not necessary, also I'd change the second part of the sentence to 'audiences were singing its praise, claiming that it was...' because 'that' is correct instead of 'how', or you could just remove the word altogether.

"Sure it’s heavier than their last two records and it does offer some neat hooks. However, that’s really all that"

I'd combine these two sentences, it flows better that way.

"It seems as if this album fits in more in line with bands like Three Days Grace and 12 Stones, both of which have even more difficulty with this issue."

First part of this sentence is dodgy, maybe something like this instead?:
This album has more in common with something bands such as Three Days Grace or 12 Stones would create, both of which have even more difficulty with this issue.

Last one: "Again, This Type of Thinking isn't a terrible bad." I think you mean terribly bad? I'd just get rid of it maybe.

Hope that helps a bit, great review though.

Toondude10
November 1st 2014


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Thanks Scuro, I'll get to that.



And that last one was a mistake, didn't mean to put in 'terrible' in it :-P

KerfuffleinaHussle
November 1st 2014


1033 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

fuck wonder what's next, easily chevelle's worst album



except for tug-o-war this album rules

PostMesmeric
November 1st 2014


779 Comments


I love this album, but I won't argue that the latter half is pretty samey.

Toondude10
November 2nd 2014


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

"fuck wonder what's next, easily chevelle's worst album"



very unpopular opinion, almost to the point of being wrong.

mryrtmrnfoxxxy
November 2nd 2014


16596 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

ugh!!!!!!

someguest
November 2nd 2014


30126 Comments


This Type Of Thinking (Could Do Your Mom)

Sciroccu
November 2nd 2014


965 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Great review, good album but I agree with you that Wonder what's next is better.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy