Rush
Permanent Waves


4.5
superb

Review

by Necrotica USER (196 Reviews)
October 11th, 2013 | 205 replies


Release Date: 1980 | Tracklist

Review Summary: A great way to start the 80s.

Chapter VII: Embracing the Times

January 1st, 1980 was a very important day for Rush. After a large string of commercial successes in the 70s, Rush returned to the studio to work on their first album of the 80s, Permanent Waves. Not having released an album during 1979, many people were wondering what the band's new record would sound like; was it going to follow in the hard-hitting progressive rock and long-winded epics of previous albums, or would it signal a rebirth for the band's sound? Released on New Year's Day, you'd expect this to be a completely new phase for the band, right? Well, Permanent Waves certainly sounds a bit different from its predecessors, but it has that noticeable Rush familiarity in terms of overall sound as well.

To be honest though, a mix of the old and the new is a great method for a band like Rush; it's interesting to hear them integrate the sounds of the specific era while retaining their progressive rock approach. Points of interest include: Geddy Lee toning down his voice (like the near-absence of high Robert Plant-esque wails), more synthesizer use, and more accessible arrangements. The latter point is the most notable one, considering that new wave was very popular at this time and Rush were heavily influenced by UK rock band The Police around this point. However, Rush were one of the biggest influences on The Police's earlier material, so the influence essentially became the influenced; it's pretty ironic to say the least. Anyway, no song goes over the ten-minute mark, so while you may consider album closer "Natural Science" an epic at 9:17, it isn't separated into individual segments like the previous epics by the band.

Instrumentally, the music is a bit more conventional this time around. Despite heavy synthesizer use and the introduction of more eclectic rock elements (even reggae rock!), the overall sound is more reserved this time around. "The Spirit of Radio," "Different Strings," and "Entre Nous" are all mostly in 4/4 time with only a few variations rhythmically; the former in particular is a very tightly structured hard rock tune that switches frequently between a slow swinging rhythm and the driving guitar riffing that occurs around the verses. Nonetheless, the song is still fantastic as it seems to be a perfect mix of emotion, accessibility, subtle technicality, and anything else it may tie together. "Freewill," despite its popularity, seems to be the real odd man out on this album when you get down to it. The sound of the verses is slightly sparse, mixing a mildly heavy guitar riff (syncing with the bass) with light guitar chord "bursts" as the drums are keeping everything in place. The 7/8 rhythm is also a bit off-putting initially as well, but it grows on you, as with the rest of the song.

So with all of these details, what's the big reason the record's so good? The consistency. Even in the two "epics," "Jacob's Ladder" and "Natural Science," there's not much musical baggage to bring the record down. Nearly every note feels where it should be; the band also know when to space out their dynamics, such as how the acoustic ballad "Different Strings" follows the energetic rocker "Entre Nous." The album's running time is only about 35 minutes, but the record feels completely satisfying at that length when you consider the replay value of each track. While the album is safer than some other Rush albums as I said, there are plenty of "wow" moments to offset the conventional ones. For example, the solo break in "Freewill" has Geddy Lee showing off his impressive bass playing with some exceptionally tricky runs as Alex Lifeson is adding his own soloing to the fray and Neil Peart is performing complex nuanced drum patterns underneath. It's cool to hear the interplay between every member of the trio as they play so technically and fluidly at once. "Natural Science" is a song full of surprises; the soft acoustic opening is pretty unexpected as it is, but a surprisingly heavy riff comes in after the main motif ends. Suddenly everything sounds frantic and tense as the song starts frequently switching between time signatures and tempos. It's stuff like this that combines well with the more accessible moments of the record, and it's a great balance all around.

So yeah, this record is an awesome follow-up to Hemispheres. It's not as technical or intense, but rather a nice mix of accessibility, technicality, dynamic variation, and consistency. The amount of control on display is actually very beneficial to this album and that's why it works. However, the band had yet to really reach their commercial peak... as Moving Pictures would definitely prove.



Recent reviews by this author
Genesis Selling England by the PoundTool Fear Inoculum
Taylor Swift LoverCarnifex World War X
Kendrick Lamar To Pimp a ButterflyYanni In My Time
user ratings (1976)
4.3
superb
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Necrotica
October 11th 2013


10693 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I wanted to experiment a bit with my reviewing style for this one. I hope it was a success, but I have a feeling I may have to tweak some stuff

mryrtmrnfoxxxy
October 11th 2013


16596 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

p great rev dawg! rush!!

tommygun
October 11th 2013


27108 Comments


swee

Necrotica
October 11th 2013


10693 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Yay, over 1000 ratings

JamieTwort
October 11th 2013


26988 Comments


Great review, Necro.

One thing:

Anyway, no song goes over the ten-minute mark, so while you may consider album closer "Natural Science" an epic at 9:17, it isn't separated into individual segments like the previous epics by the band.


It might be worth mentioning "Jacob's Ladder" here seeing as you then go on to say:

Even in the two "epics," "Jacob's Ladder" and "Natural Science,"


Just a minor thing really.

ViperAces
October 11th 2013


12596 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

four of the best songs the band ever made

menawati
October 11th 2013


16715 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Brilliant album, enjoyed the rev but are you sure about 'large string of...critical successes in the 70s' ?

From what I've read I thought they were hated by the music press for a long time especially in the 70's but had such a large cult following it didnt matter. I could be wrong tho maybe all those albums got glowing reviews.

It's only quite recently that they have attained any sort of respect outside their fanbase.

Gwynsalt
October 11th 2013


204 Comments


nice

DrHouseSchuldiner
October 11th 2013


5642 Comments


best album ever

BigPleb
October 11th 2013


65784 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I WILL CHOOSE FREEWILL :D

demigod!
October 11th 2013


49583 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

spirit of radio is the greatest song of all time (except the 70s)

BigPleb
October 11th 2013


65784 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Fave on here ya



Dat bassline

Atari
Staff Reviewer
October 11th 2013


27945 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8

u better give moving pictures at least a 4.5 :3

evilford
October 11th 2013


63954 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

nice rev great album, jacob's ladder is one of my fav rush songs.

Smial
October 11th 2013


800 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

yee

KILL
October 11th 2013


81580 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

sweet



natural science is one of the best songs ever

Necrotica
October 11th 2013


10693 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Thanks for the comments. Yeah, this rules :]

KILL
October 11th 2013


81580 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

never see no staff commenting on rush threads weird huh!

JamieTwort
October 11th 2013


26988 Comments


You'd think at least Willie would like them.

Necrotica
October 11th 2013


10693 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Yeah, there's been literally no staff review for Rush yet



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy