Dutch Uncles
Out of Touch in the Wild


3.5
great

Review

by Caleb C. USER (26 Reviews)
February 1st, 2013 | 8 replies


Release Date: 01/14/2013 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Wow, that sounds pretty cool.

Sometimes the initial thought of “wow that sounds pretty cool” can hurt an individual’s overall outlook on a band. From that point on, your mind is left to fight between focusing on that one ‘pretty cool’ thing versus everything else the band brings to the table. Worst of all, that one intriguing thing could actually turn out to be the only remotely interesting factor in the entire affair. And when the luster of that one stand out dimension of the band wears off, you’re left with nothing else to make you continue listening. The Dutch Uncles sophomore release Cadenza was largely plagued by just such a dilemma. We were presented with catchy songs with intricate time signatures and looping guitar work the likes of which hadn’t really been experienced before in the indie pop realm. But when song after song emulated that same looping style it started to drag and mesh together, making Cadenza a much less exciting release then what our initial thoughts might have implied.

With that we have a clear idea of what the Dutch Uncles had to do in order to improve upon their previous average outing. And they’ve seemed to achieve that with flying colors. From the start of the record it’s entirely obvious that this is still the quirky, off beat Dutch Uncles that we heard on Cadenza, but there was something different, something that was not entirely obvious on the first listen. That one thing, as it turns out is the addition of, quite simply, more stuff. Each song has that baseline of a keyboard loop or guitar lick that will hook your head into a gentle bob, but on top of it all is dense synths, swelling violins, and other, more obscure, instrumentation. Lead single “Flexxin” is a great example of this shift because if the song had been placed in previous outings, the dynamic violin lead would have been left alone to carry the entirety of the song, but is now piled onto by stacatto synth work, tambourine shaking, and even more violins.

Over top of the proceedings lie Duncan Wallis’s near ethereal vocals, which add a sense of serenity to the conglomeration of sound underneath. Vocally, it’s not really all that attention grabbing, but instead makes for a nice accompaniment to the improved outing from the rest of the band, presenting a very complete sounding package. The strongest vocal track is by far “Nometo”, where Wallis’s vocals basically become part of the instrumentation, resulting in a song that sounds much like something we would hear from M83 (not to mention with the electric guitar lick that sounds straight out of his playbook). Overall, I think the Dutch Uncles have maximized what they can do within the restraints that they have established for themselves. They’ve set a formula, built it up as far as they can, and are now at the top of what that formula can provide. The question now is how long this single idea can keep them from being lost in the indie pop fray.



Recent reviews by this author
Linkin Park The Hunting PartyMongol Horde Mongol Horde
Atmosphere SouthsidersThe Menzingers Rented World
Manchester Orchestra CopeLinkin Park Hybrid Theory
user ratings (20)
Chart.
3.6
great

Comments:Add a Comment 
iswimfast
February 1st 2013


1346 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

The length of my reviews always makes the 'body' of the thing look disgusting. Meh. Hiiiiii. Album is much better than I expected. Here's 'Flexxin':

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHXxKitLdrU

Am I getting better at this review thing or no? Let me know, feedback is always appreciated.

visualeyes
February 1st 2013


2 Comments


"We were presented with catchy songs with intricate time signatures and looping guitar work the likes of which hadn’t really be experienced before in the indie pop realm"

Make sure to fix "hadn't really be experienced" to been experienced also

"Vocally, it’s nothing really all that attention grabbing" this sounds bit wordy

otherwise good review, pos'd

iswimfast
February 1st 2013


1346 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

fixed : )

MisterTornado
Contributing Reviewer
February 1st 2013


4507 Comments


I saw pitchfork comparing this to Oasis and Beady Eye and Liam Gallagher and was like WAH

iswimfast
February 1st 2013


1346 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

not a huge fan of those artists personally, so my input on that comparison would be meaningless.

AliW1993
Contributing Reviewer
February 1st 2013


7427 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Pretty good review. I agree the album's their best yet, though I don't think there's anything on it which matches Cadenza's title track.

To be fair that Pitchfork review wasn't really comparing them to Oasis. In fact it's pointing out how different the bands currently emerging from Manchester are.

iswimfast
February 1st 2013


1346 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

it's funny you say that because the whole first paragraph is based off the fact that, on first listen, Cadenza (the song) blew me away.

Pndi
June 13th 2013


465 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

they're currently opening for Paramore, curious to hear how they sound live



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy