Sylosis
Monolith


2.0
poor

Review

by NeoSpaz USER (32 Reviews)
October 17th, 2012 | 138 replies | 3,977 views


Release Date: 2012 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Lengthening a song does not make it better.

2 of 12 thought this review was well written

Sylosis is a band that divides many opinions in the metal community, mainly because of the two sides arguing whether they are the new heralds of thrash metal or merely a metalcore band playing some fast riffs. This album is the third released by Sylosis and is one of the least interesting releases by them.

Looking down the track list for Monolith, one thing jumps out. Only two tracks on this is under 5 minutes long, the rest sitting around the 5-6 minute mark. First up on the record is ‘Out from Below’ which is seconds under the 7 minute mark. Whilst the instrumentals are interesting, it is the length of this song that is a major issue, making an average song drag and feel extremely overdone. Most of the riffs have that worn feel, as if the band is listening to old thrash metal records and trying to parallel the sound and riffs. The only issue with this is the fact that the riffs do not blend well together, leaving a listener feel like they’re trapped in a vortex of mismatched riffs and solos.

The mess of riffs is continually found throughout the album with the most annoying part being the interchanging atmospheric parts. The droning synth parts would be good as an introduction to a song, but when these are scattered in less than strategic places, they throw out the balance of a school. It is much the same with the clean guitar parts, which come up in most of the songs on the record. This is what brings the overall quality of this record down, the repetitiveness. As each song goes by, you can almost predict the outcome of each song. You know there’s a clean part coming around the corner; you can tell that the song will slow down; you can almost see the chugging riff that will end the song.

This is not to say that the riffs are technical, they are. They are not by any means untalented, nor irritatingly bland. It is the fact that most do not go together well at all. The solos are much the same, not blending or suiting the riffs as well as they could, as well as being dialled back strangely in the mix, rather than showing the slick soloing techniques that are demonstrated. The first few times that this happens, it felt out of place, but was not overly frustrating. However once this became a constant factor, it grew frustrating. It grates on the nerve to hear the solo that would add a desperately needed change.

The vocals are nothing spectacular; rather, they are nothing short of boring. Bland, mid range, throaty rasps that are visible in most –core bands puncture most of the songs. Sometimes these could almost be classed as shouts, but then the slip back into the dull ritual, the same bland vocal patterns that have been abused for the last decade.

The other instrumental parts in the band do come forward frequently, but do lack like most modern albums. The bass is inaudible for the most, completely drained out by the vocals, drums and guitars, which is extremely disappointing. Then again, so many modern records lack audible bass, so much so that it could be removed from the band and you would barely notice.

The drums here are excellent, the pinnacle of an otherwise average record. Whilst at times they sink into boring patterns, the fills and increases are grin worthy. However, there just isn’t enough of them and at times the bass drum just doesn’t have a fantastic hit to it, blending in with the snare. There

This record is simply average. There is no way to get around that fact, simply because the songs are mediocre yet not bad. However many songs would have been far more enjoyable if they were a minute or two shorter. If some more diversity was added in the vocals, perhaps it would just be that much better. Unfortunately, what we're left with is a incomplete canvas. Some pieces seem well constructed, whilst others seem disconnected and not relevant to the overall working of the painting.



Recent reviews by this author
Arrows Try And Stay UprightArrows Modern Art & Politics
Arrows Don't Write PoetryMiles Away Endless Roads
The Black Dahlia Murder EverblackDark New Day Hail Mary
user ratings (208)
Chart.
3.6
great
other reviews of this album
matt1148 (4.5)
British hopefuls return only a year later with another stunning album but steering it in a slightly ...

Drew Tyler (4)
Sylosis offer an extremely potent brand of metal, consisting of aggressive thrash/death metal backed...


Comments:Add a Comment 
NeoSpaz
October 17th 2012



4517 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

There you go KILL.

Before you fanboys start negging the living fuck out of this, it has potential, but it is too frequently squandered.

Yup that's it.

BigPleb
October 17th 2012



33786 Comments


Reads more like a 1.5, hugely bias review

Digging: Opeth - Pale Communion

NeoSpaz
October 17th 2012



4517 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Oh dear.

NeoSpaz
October 17th 2012



4517 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Honestly, I tried to like this. People around me were going on about how fantastic it was, but if you look at it critically you do notice the obvious flaws such as the repeated structure.

Grizzlypyro
October 17th 2012



99 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Pretty shallow review, sounds very bias. But still its written pretty well. Have to disagree with the score however.

Digging: Kanye West - My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy

BigPleb
October 17th 2012



33786 Comments


You don't 'try' to like something, you either like it or you don't.

I'm under the impression that you wrote this review just for KILL? Trying to be an 'elitist' are we?

apert
October 17th 2012



2970 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Don't agree at all but review is well written

Digging: Emperor - In the Nightside Eclipse

NeoSpaz
October 17th 2012



4517 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

No. He asked me to give my opinion on it, and this is the one I formed. I'm not purposely trying to be hard on it, it just had nothing that stuck out.

BigPleb
October 17th 2012



33786 Comments


The review is pretty well written so I'll give you props for that at least

apert
October 17th 2012



2970 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I will agree though that too many songs end with like a minute of boring atmospheric stuff

NeoSpaz
October 17th 2012



4517 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

That really got on my nerves. I mean some of the riffs are great, but they get really jumbled and mismatched. There's a few that would have worked better in other songs, and the songs 9 and 10 were the most impressive for me.

KjSwantko
October 17th 2012



9046 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Too bad the music isn't as good as the album artwork.

BigPleb
October 17th 2012



33786 Comments


Yet you gave it a 4.5?

The album is not as consistent as their previous efforts, but Josh's vocals and guitar work have improved hugely. The drums have always been great and are raised even higher, the riffs are really strong too.

NeoSpaz
October 17th 2012



4517 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I prefer this to their earlier work, though my rating doesn't say much. It definitely just needs something, I can't quite put my finger on what it is.

BigPleb
October 17th 2012



33786 Comments


If you think there is something 'missing' the give it time to grow, may change your mind in time.

apert
October 17th 2012



2970 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Yeah I love everything else, but I don't like that loads of songs end with a minute of crap. Hence the 4.5 not 5

BigPleb
October 17th 2012



33786 Comments


Album is not even within touching distance of a 5 anyway.

NeoSpaz
October 17th 2012



4517 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I originally had a much more negative review written up when I first listened to a stream for this Lebowski, however, with time, this has been able to get a bit more appeal. I'm still adamant that if they interlock the riffs better and don't be so out of place that this would work better.

BigPleb
October 17th 2012



33786 Comments


Fair enough, agree to disagree.

NeoSpaz
October 17th 2012



4517 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Good. I'm not writing this review to tread on toes, I wrote it because I felt it needed a different take.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2013 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy