Linkin Park
Living Things


3.0
good

Review

by Simon Killip USER (29 Reviews)
October 8th, 2012 | 6 replies


Release Date: 2012 | Tracklist

Review Summary: A big improvement.



A brief bit of history for you: I was a huge fan of these guys from their debut Nu-metal album "Hybrid Theory" back in 2000. They were in the driving seat of the Nu wave that hit everyone: they were heavy, melodic, pop, and just sounded very fresh at the time. They then made - what I consider their best album to date - "Meteora" back in 2003, which was effectively more of the same. Then the band went on a break and didn't show up until 2007 with their new album "Minutes To Midnight" - produced by legend Rick Rubin - which was a fairly different take on their sound, sounding a lot more commercial, radio-friendly than the normal, and to be fair it was all a little generic. Still, the album pleased the majority of fans and dragged in a lot of new fans.
Now, think back a couple of years to 2010, when Linkin Park made their last album "A Thousand Suns", not only produced by Rick again, but now had Mike Shinoda producing, too. This change also had a huge impact on their sound. To an unprecedented extreme; to the point where it didn't sound like LP at all, and alienating alot of longtime fans. Mike Shinoda's response was that if they made another rock record that sounded the same, they would forever be branded 'Nu-metal', so this was a way of rebelling. Overall, it left alot of people annoyed, and was fairly average.

Now, even though the last album wasn't that great, it is clear at this point that the album was a stepping stone for what was to come in the form of their latest effort "Living Things", produced once again by Rick and Mike. I actually think it's pretty good album. Taking the electronic sound of "ATS" and the rock structure and elements from their heavy days, this album gives a little twist and a slightly newer sound for the band. Taking all the strengths from every album to date and amalgamating it into this new beast.

Singing, Chester does what he does best, and I'd have to say this is some of his finest vocal work; for the most part, the hair on the back of your neck sat on end.
But what is seeming to progress a lot more in the band, is Mike singing. And this is my problem with the newer material of LP. It would appear Mike wants to be in the limelight all the time, and with him co-producing it makes it even easier to have the say on doing it. I'm all for new additions to the band, or any band, but Mike's voice has never been a good one for me, it's ranged from bad to average. Sometimes the singing works in the album, but for the most part he should really know his place in tha band. Just my opinion. But I think the first half of the album is lot more engaging due to Chester have the vocal time. The album drags on a little and I've noticed it's because Mike has alot of singing time.
The same applies to lyrics: Chester's lyrics are good and his singing is amazing. Mike Shinoda's singing is average, his rapping dated and cheesey and his lyrics are very generic. He tries to make the band a lot more politically aware in - mainly the last two albums - the last three albums. Politics go hand-in-hand in punk music, so its something that is overused and done before. I love punk music, and many bands have proved you can talk about politics without hitting all the generic points. Unfortunately Mike doesn't stray out of it, and listening to what he has to say is a complete bore. And if he isn't rapping about oversaid topics, he's singing about things he has sung about countless times in the past. How many people can f--k him at this point in his career, really?

But overall, a massive improvement from their last album. Sure, the album isn't perfect, but the sound from ATS with the structure of the old makes for a compromise on which kind of fan you are.
Like I say, the main flaws with the album are Mike's overall contributions to the vocal and lyric writing side of the band. He's done a great job in pushing the bands sound forward in sound. If you're a fan of the old Linkin Park, you'll be pleasantly surprised by this album. It caters for fans of the old and new and if this is the sound of things to come, there is still a fan in me.



Recent reviews by this author
DIR EN GREY ArcheMarilyn Manson Portrait of an American Family
Marilyn Manson Mechanical AnimalsMarilyn Manson Antichrist Superstar
Marilyn Manson The High End of LowMarilyn Manson Eat Me, Drink Me
user ratings (1213)
Chart.
2.8
good
other reviews of this album
1 of
  • Nick Mongiardo CONTRIBUTOR (2.5)
    Despite boasting some impressive tracks, a good portion of the album comes off as either j...

    Hari676 (3.5)
    Surprisingly good!!!...

    NinthVenom (3.5)
    Linkin Park puts out yet another solid LP with better songwriting and instrumentals....

    91sam (3.5)
    Somewhere between old and new LP, you won't be disappointed...

  • H. (2.5)
    Linkin Park's two sides combine into one....

    cventura75 (4.5)
    Linkin Park has never had a dud album and Living Things is proof of this....

    ImTheOnlyThugInTheBuildin (2)
    Unfortunately too many conflicting styles prevent this from being the return to form that ...

    TheRustyMan (3.5)
    Victimized! Victimized! Never again! Victimized! This sounds like the Linkin Park we all k...

  • paulosullivan (3.5)
    The sound of a band beginning to understand their own musical direction...

    Dishpan (3.5)
    Living Things is Linkin Park’s most solid album since Meteora came around in 2003....

    Kevin Williams (4)
    Hardly the next nu-metal album, but a great album nonetheless....

    Eventide (2)
    I know plenty have reviewed this, but I figured i'd give my take on it....

  • SowingSeason STAFF (2.5)
    Lost in the echo of their glorified past....

    Michael B. (4)
    One step closer to the perfect hybrid theory....

    BlinkinBharg (3.5)
    ...

    PercussiveSound (3.5)
    The toughest challenge for listeners of LIVING THINGS is to forget about what they expect ...

  • gryndstone (3)
    It isn't mind-blowing, nor is it underwhelming. They tried to please everyone, and this is...

    Ryan Fitz (2)
    A return to form?...

    CasualListen (4)
    Linkin Park is back with a new sound and a far less aggressive lyrical approach. While "L...

    novanebula361 (4)
    Great, but different....

  • Irving Tan STAFF (3)
    Alive, kicking, and screaming – but only just....

    Peter K. Mark (2)
    Cheesy, poppy and boring electro collection of "A Thousand Suns" b-sides....

    Raul Stanciu STAFF (2.5)
    Right now, Linkin Park should just stick to whatever direction they want to pursue and com...

    Bog91 (3)
    Finding some much needed footing after stumbling around for over five years....

  • Ian (1.5)
    Don't let people have you expecting a return to old Linkin Park. Living Things is a bands ...


Comments:Add a Comment 
ChopSuey
October 8th 2012


2392 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"Still, the album pleased the majority of fans"

I'm not sure about that, but ok

DrGonzo1937
October 8th 2012


6820 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

@ChopSuey
It kept more old fans happy than A Thousand Suns did. lol

DrGonzo1937
October 8th 2012


6820 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

@Pestiferous

Which is a good thing, right? They did a good job in trying to please fans of old and new.

I just thought it was a nice easy listen. It's a solid sounding album. Nothing special. And as a fan of the old it isn't a patch on the first two albums, but I enjoyed it alot.


ThroneOfAgony
October 8th 2012


3485 Comments


Bad album, and band

breakingthefragile
October 8th 2012


2966 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Needed another review.

Digging: Molly Drake - Molly Drake

YoYoMancuso
October 8th 2012


11222 Comments


lol alex



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy