Slayer
Reign in Blood


2.0
poor

Review

by Brendan Schroer STAFF
April 12th, 2012 | 70 replies | 4,585 views


Release Date: 1986 | Tracklist

Review Summary: An album that should have been classic.

As I sit here typing this review, there lies an eerie breeze and foggy weather outside my window. The storm just passed, and now the skies are gray and darkened above me. Everything looks miserable and gloomy, and the clouds are looming over my house as I write. Now, what does this have to do with anything? Well unfortunately, the description is an accurate metaphor for the thrash "classic" Reign in Blood by Slayer.

Back in 1983, thrash metal was growing as a genre. Venom had laid the tracks out for subsequent bands like Metallica, Anthrax, and of course Slayer. At this time, metal bands had more simplistic musical directions and most artists in thrash didn't go for complex styles like they later would. Slayer belonged to this pack, releasing a relatively primitive yet excellently performed thrash release by the name of "Show No Mercy" in 1983. The album laid the groundwork for future albums, as well as taking a cue from some of the NWOBHM bands around at that time. Then came 1985's Hell Awaits; the album was soon praised for its atmosphere and progressive direction, being quite advanced for its time. The production was a tad muddy, but that was actually one of its special assets and it helped enhance that atmosphere.

The description in the first paragraph, again, describes perfectly what would come after this. Essentially, Show No Mercy was the precursor to the immense storm that was gathering. Hell Awaits just happened to be the blizzard of a storm, crushing all that stood before it and blasting all nonbelievers. The whole experience raped everyone's senses and destroyed any negative perceptions people might have had of the band after Show No Mercy. Then Reign in Blood is the next storm to gather... but then it becomes a bevy of false alarms and misfortune.

Let's look back to the time when this was released... thrash was at an all-time highpoint, with legendary releases from big name artists such as Metallica and Megadeth, among others. Expectations were extremely high for any metal band around this year because of those extremely strong releases making their appearance. Reign in Blood happened to be one of those albums in the same crowd, with many holding it as the "Holy Grail" of thrash music. Well, let's just explore further.

The album has 10 songs, most of which are under 3 minutes, so it makes for an extremely quick and short affair. Only two songs make it past the 4-minute mark, and those very songs bookend the album. Between those tracks are 8 lightning-fast pieces of thrash metal mayhem, and BOY are they fast. It's been said that the majority of the songs go over 230 BPM (Beats per minute), only slowing down for a few exceptions. The style of this album can be generally considered a punk-meets-thrash combo, with many nods to crossover acts such as Suicidal Tendencies and Stormtroopers of Death, but way faster and more evil. Adding to this is the production of Slayer-newcomer Rick Rubin, who brings a shiny polish to the gritty production that was used on previous albums.

The album starts out promisingly enough, with the near-5-minute "Angel of Death" leading the pack. This song is filled to the brim with memorable riffs, great lyrics and of course the (in)famous scream from bassist/singer Tom Araya. Dave Lombardo is blasting away at his drumset, quickly but tastefully. Meanwhile, Jeff Hanneman and Kerry King are firing away at their frets with frightening precision and power. The lyrics of the song talk of Joseph Mengele (Nazi physician) and describes, in pretty shocking detail, the experiments and horrors of the concentration camps in WWII. After a particularly memorable slow groove in the middle, the band speed up for the insane solo at the end. The drums are banging faster than before, and the fretboards are SCORCHING. Overall, this is a great song, and one that could've fit into previous albums.

Unfortunately, the album pretty much falls apart from there. The next 8 songs are those short lightning-fast thrash-fests I mentioned. While at first glance they seem really cool, they don't have any real coherency or flow to them. Take "Necrophobic" for example. The whole song sounds more like a sort of "I can play faster than you!" speed contest than a real fully-developed song. In fact, that very song is short enough to be an interlude for many bands (it only clocks in at a whooping 1:40). The other songs follow suit, unfortunately; "Alter of Sacrifice" being loaded with too many unnecessary solos for its own good, "Piece by Piece" never taking time to really take hold of the listener before it ends, and so on. While many say that the running time and odd flow of the songs is supposed to be the point, it just sounds awkward and half-baked in the long run.

The solos don't help matters either. To say that the guitarists are "wanking" would be a massive understatement. It's not so much wanking as it is pure laziness on their part, with fingers running up and down the frets without any rhyme or reason. It doesn't help either that the solos are awkwardly placed in many locations. For instance, "Jesus Saves" decides to throw in a random shred-fest in an area where the second chorus should have been. I really brings a damper on the songwriting aspect of the music, and the solos honestly could have been cut WAY down in the album.

Fortunately, there is indeed a light at the end of the tunnel, as "Postmortem" and "Raining Blood" pick up the slack at the end. "Postmortem" isn't amazing, but it's certainly a step up from most of the disappointments pervading the album. It begins with a mid-tempo groove (very tasteful, I have to say) and retains this speed until the huge roaring climax at the very end, which segues into "Raining Blood." The lyrics are pretty effective in conveying the atmosphere in this track, opting for a darker, more Hell Awaits-oriented style here. After the speedy riff at the end (which is thankfully devoid of solos), we reach the closer, "Raining Blood." It begins with the sound of rainfall and tribal drums, along with ambient noises in the background to give it a special feel and effectiveness. After the world-famous guitar intro, the song eventually picks up the speed until reaching another huge speed assault. Tom Araya's vocals are especially strong here, this time going for a mix between his angry shouts and a somewhat eerie, almost mocking sort of voice. Eventually, everything leads to the fastest solo on the whole album. Maybe I'm missing something here, but is there a point to this solo at all? Yes, it leads to the rainfall at the end, but it's a weak cop-out for what could be a fantastic climax. Overall, the ending of the song was really disappointing, as again it didn't really have a rhyme or reason to be there.

Overall, this album was quite a disappointment in the long run. There are some solid moments, but when compared to the ridiculous placement/wankery of the grating solos and the inconsistent and downright weak songwriting, there's little to offer. Needless to say, the songs that bookend the album bring out the albums strengths, but the rotten middle kills the whole experience.



Recent reviews by this author
Queen Queen IIOpeth Heritage
Metallica Master of PuppetsEd Sheeran x
Rush Hold Your FireLana Del Rey Ultraviolence
user ratings (3417)
Chart.
4.4
superb
other reviews of this album
1 of

Comments:Add a Comment 
Ovrot
April 11th 2012



10465 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

More like necrofagist43

amiright?


nah, but i respectfully disagree

Digging: Jean Michel Jarre - Oxygene

taylormemer
April 11th 2012



4913 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

"As I sit here typing this review, there lies an eerie breeze and foggy weather outside my window. The storm just passed, and now the skies are gray and darkened above me."

Stopped reading here.

Fluttertrank
April 11th 2012



17098 Comments


not really. band got old fast. pos'd

stabbler
April 11th 2012



1415 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

"Let's look back to the time when this was released... thrash was at an all-time highpoint, with legendary releases from big name artists such as Metallica and Megadeth, among others."

Please tell me you were at least born during said infamous time

macadoolahicky
April 11th 2012



1835 Comments


Don't totally care for this myself, but your review is so-so...

ShinXetsu
April 12th 2012



605 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Respectfully disagree.

Graveyard
April 12th 2012



5598 Comments


If your review isn't as good as you wanted it to be, why did you post it?

AtomicShane
April 12th 2012



1756 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Im not the biggest slayer fan but...da fuq is dis shit

CaptainDooRight
April 12th 2012



28340 Comments


pos




Digging: IQ - The Road of Bones

EyesWideShut
April 12th 2012



3098 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

"there lies an eerie breeze and foggy weather outside my window. The storm just passed, and now the skies are gray and darkened above me."

^ dude werent those lyrics to some BM song??

i grew out of Slayer but yea the rating is wrong. Angel of Death alone is worth a 3.5.

Parallels
April 12th 2012



6640 Comments


Thanks for the bloated history lesson. I hate to sound mean, but come on, this is SLAYER you are dissing. Your review only told me that the album is too fast for you.

glezz
April 12th 2012



235 Comments


Negatory on all counts.

A TWO is ridiculous by any measure.
I'd almost say you don't like metal, especially thrash.

LepreCon
April 12th 2012



3593 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Album is thrash defined....



Or not. But still, dafuq is dis?



Pos'd.

ZombicidalMan
April 12th 2012



1721 Comments


Hey man, have you heard of this album called Scum?

Seriously though, I think the influence this album brought earns it more than a 2. Your criticism doesn't seem to back up your rating, especially since you speak so highly of guitars that manage to combust. I'd either bump up the score, or provide some more detail to the low rating.

Nico666
April 12th 2012



6 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Necrophagist...as your name implies how can you like necrophagist but you can't like this Slayer album??? Bitch please.....

DeadBeat
April 12th 2012



529 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Blasphemy

TheNotrap
April 12th 2012



7981 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

"An album that should have been classic"
No comments...

MichaelSnoxall
April 12th 2012



12163 Comments


I'm not the biggest Thrash fan or even a big Slayer fan, but even I think a 2 might have been a tad low. I'd give it a 3.5
I've heard it a few times, don't think it's close to a 5, but that's just my taste.

thumbcrusher
April 12th 2012



3578 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

you overstate the song lengths a bit but the review's not bad.

SpiritCrusher2
April 12th 2012



2891 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

every song on this album rules, when will people realize that?!



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2013 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy