Lou Reed and Metallica
Lulu


1.0
awful

Review

by YetAnotherBrick USER (28 Reviews)
November 10th, 2011 | 74 replies


Release Date: 2011 | Tracklist

Review Summary: An atrocity for the ages.

This has to be a joke. It has to be. How is it possible for such seasoned and experienced musicians like Lou Reed and the guys in Metallica to create something this artistically void? We know that Lou Reed can do better than this; he was in The Velvet Underground, and was a large part of the creative force behind the very unique, and very influential albums the band put out in the 60s. And for those that for some reason don’t know, Metallica’s discography ain’t too shabby, either (their earlier albums, anyway). We know that these guys at least used to be able to write songs, so what caused them to suddenly forget? Was it simply a result of the clashing of musicians used to playing very different styles from one another, or was it something else? Because I find it very hard to believe that these musicians gathered together to write Lulu, something supposed to be different, unique, and ground-breaking, and for no reason other than terrible decisions in instrumentation and songwriting, failed this miserably.

That’s the first problem with Lulu. It drones on and on in a disguise of “avant-garde,” and accessorizes with one of those irritating pretenses that seems to imply if you don’t like the music, you “just don’t get it.” But there’s nothing to “get.” Lulu does absolutely nothing that can truly be considered “avant-garde.” It never experiments with harmony, there’s no use of any foreign instruments, and repeating the same riffs over and over again for minutes at a time, with no change in volume or intensity, is about as experimental as Lulu gets with song structures. The one attribute of the album that might be able to be considered something along the lines of “avant-garde” are the lyrics, but the words are so poorly constructed, painfully unsubtle, and create images so ineffective, that I refuse to call them anything but nauseating.

So Lulu lied to us. That doesn’t necessarily make it the worst album ever. No, it’s what the album does do that makes it the bewilderingly atrocious piece of work it is. To begin, this album displays Lou Reed giving one of the worst vocal performances I’ve ever heard. Calling it a “vocal performance” would be a stretch, actually, as his monotone rambling only sometimes follows the true definition of “singing.” And to add insult to injury, the volume of his voice is turned up strangely high in the mix, drawing very much unwanted attention to it. And since his voice is so disturbingly loud, it drowns out the other instruments in the background, making the production of the entire album sound extremely amateur and off-putting. “Off-putting,” to put it very lightly.

And while Reed is mindlessly yammering away his incoherent stories about how you “worship someone that actively despises you,” or about how he “pumps blood in the sunshine/And you wear a leather box with azaleas,” the guys in Metallica aren’t really doing anything of much interest, either. What Lulu does most often in terms of how its songs progress is let frustratingly amateur and unimaginative riffs (the fact that these riffs were written by the same guys who wrote a lot of the crushing and stunningly well-put together riffs on metal classics like Ride the Lightning and Master of Puppets is absolutely mind-boggling), meander around in the background, while Reed is front and center, making sure everyone hears about how he’s a “woman who likes men.” The riffs seldom change, and when they do, they only transition to something just as dull and repetitive. And with Lou in the foreground, it’s difficult to appreciate the lazy repetition simply for its atmosphere, and bask in the ambience. This is exactly what happens in “Cheat On Me,” whose intro is one of the few listenable moments on the album. The song begins with a synth pattern, over which an actually very pretty violin melody is then laid. And right when you’re about to start getting a little lost in the atmosphere, Lou spits all over it with his nonsense and totally screws everything up.

Nothing this album does works. Nothing matches, nothing fits, nothing flows. The fast, thrashy riffs that act as the backdrop for “Mistress Dread” contrast horribly with Reed’s slow, one-dimensional vocal delivery. Reed’s harmonizing with Metallica vocalist James Hetfield in “Iced Honey” does not work at all, simply because their voices do not go together, especially when Hetfield actually sounds like he’s trying to sing. And the songs go absolutely nowhere. If the horrid lyrics that Reed has come up with here are actually trying to say something, their final conclusion is never reached, because the lyrics nor the music ever seem to point in any direction. They just aimlessly wander for their entire lengths. In “Pumping Blood,” and…well, every other song on the album, Reed just keeps repeating his jargon over and over and over again. And with the riffs being just basic power chord variations, with seldom a solo or any other entertaining display of musicianship, the album becomes painfully boring. Nothing happens.

Nothing happens, that is, except the listener’s saddening realization that a group of musicians that were once some of the greats has spit forth an album that expresses nothing, and in the least tasteful way possible. Lulu may have a few listenable moments, like the intro to “Cheat On Me,” or the second half of “Junior Dad,” being basically 10 minutes of soft, ambient strings. But those moments don’t give the album any more merit; they don’t matter. What matters here is that Lou Reed and Metallica, a group of massively influential and once massively talented musicians, failed. Reed should’ve known no one would care that “the brain that was once listening now/Shoots out its tiresome message,” even if it is true, but to a higher degree. Because Lulu is far worse than “tiresome.” It’s a painful, pretentious, droning mess that has tarnished not one, but two legacies.



Recent reviews by this author
The Beatles Rubber SoulSerengeti Family and Friends
The Chinese Stars A Rare SensationThe National Trouble Will Find Me
The Story So Far Under Soil and DirtAesop Rock Labor Days
user ratings (938)
Chart.
1.4
very poor
other reviews of this album
1 of

Comments:Add a Comment 
YetAnotherBrick
November 11th 2011


4473 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

Another review for my school paper, hence the amount of background that would normally be unnecessary for a review on this site. And yes, I know that this review is probably unnecessary on this site, too, but like I said, I was writing it anyway for the school paper, so I decided to put it on here too, for what it's worth.

I probably spent way too much time on this.

ThespianLesbian
November 11th 2011


248 Comments


Ghost neggers are mean, I pos'd

parawhorez
November 11th 2011


206 Comments


Yeah you spent way too much time XD but swell nonetheless.

Ovrot
November 11th 2011


10503 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

as much as i want to 1 this i cannot because i can find music worse than this and there are some parts that are ok

Digging: Satan's Satyrs - Demo 2010

YetAnotherBrick
November 11th 2011


4473 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

Thanks Thespian, and you too kayla haha

Insurrection
Contributing Reviewer
November 11th 2011


21453 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

epic album

Digging: Aspherium - The Fall of Therenia

ShadowRemains
November 11th 2011


21044 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

why don't u rank it

Digging: Execration (NOR) - Morbid Dimensions

Insurrection
Contributing Reviewer
November 11th 2011


21453 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

dont feel like it

ShadowRemains
November 11th 2011


21044 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

come on u ALWAYS feel like raaaanking stuff

Storm In A Teacup
November 11th 2011


13149 Comments


Hah, "atrocity for the ages" is a good fit.

Insurrection
Contributing Reviewer
November 11th 2011


21453 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

yea but every song here is a masterpiece. i think ill rank some btbam. brb

Knott-
Emeritus
November 11th 2011


10198 Comments


great review

YetAnotherBrick
November 11th 2011


4473 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

Thanks a lot man, that means a ton coming from you.

Xenophanes
Emeritus
November 11th 2011


10611 Comments


Great review man, but tbh I didn't need to read another reason why this was bad.

Digging: Kayo Dot - Coffins On Io

Irving
Staff Reviewer
November 11th 2011


7311 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Decent review (pos), even if you repeat yourself too many times (if I had a dime for every time you used/implied the phrase "nothing happens"...). But in more pertinent matters, for me what's curious is the fact that it seems like no one has ever listened to Lou Reed before. Moreover, everyone who has commented/bashed on this album seem to take glee in the fact that they can't enjoy a particular album.

I find these two things quite strange.

YetAnotherBrick
November 11th 2011


4473 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

Well, thank you for still reading it and complimenting me even when the review was unnecessary haha

YetAnotherBrick
November 11th 2011


4473 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

"for me what's curious is the fact that it seems like no one has ever listened to Lou Reed before"

You didn't get that from this review, did you?

Xenophanes
Emeritus
November 11th 2011


10611 Comments


Nah man no problem you usually write great stuff so it's always a good read.

YetAnotherBrick
November 11th 2011


4473 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

Wow, thanks dude, much appreciated

11hoagjo
November 11th 2011


15 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Awesome review



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy