Relient K
Apathetic


5.0
classic

Review

by Ryan Williford USER (48 Reviews)
November 14th, 2005 | 30 replies


Release Date: 2005 | Tracklist


Originating from Canton, Ohio, USA, this spiritually inclined pop punk band was formed by Matt Thiessen (b. Canada; guitar/vocals), Matt Hoopes (guitar), Brian Pittman (bass), and David Douglas (drums). The quartet took their unusual name from the beaten up car that Hoopes drove at the time (a Plymouth Reliant K). They made their live debut on New Year's Day, 1998, and it did not take long for the quartet to build a regional following, and also sign a recording contract with the indie label Gotee. The band began releasing albums at a rather rapid pace, including 2001's The Anatomy Of The Tongue in Cheek and 2003"s Two Lefts Don't Make A Right " But Three Do. Constantly on the road supporting their albums, Relient K has shared the concert stage with similarly styled outfits such as New Found Glory and Good Charlotte.

^^walmart.com^^

~~~

Now donít get me wrong, touring with Good Charlotte helped them but they are no Good Charlotte. People turn away from them because they are a Christian band, people turn away from them because they are punk, and some people turn away from them just because they aren't black and singing about how they are hustlers and gangsters. To tell you the truth, i was thinking about buying MMHMM before a girl at my school said they were good. Now, i know listening to a girl that isn't your girlfriend is not a good thing, but hell in this case it was. Now they have come out with this EP.

1. The Truth - This song is one of the best new tracks on this CD. It seems like Matt is singing about an ex but who cares what the song is driven by if its this damn good? Did i mention this is just the opening song? 9/10

2. Apathetic Way to be - The vocals seem to fit in with the MMHMM CD and as the booklet put it, ""Originally appeared on the vinyl version of "MMHMM" released on mono vs. stereo." How many people were lucky enough to get the Vinyl MMHMM? SO yeah, like I said the vocals fit in with MMHMM and proves the Relient K has found the way they want their music. The best part is when the timer hits around 2:45 when the vocals change a little and he finishes the song. 10/10

3. Be My Escape [acoustic] - This is even better the original version and that's saying a lot. In the version, it sounds like thereís another instrument besides bass, guitar, and drum. I canít quite put a finger on it. It adds to the song, but I still want to know what the hell it is. 9/10

4. Which to Bury, us or the Hatchet [acoustic] - This really steps down from the original version, since it doesnít have that same feeling you got when you heard it on MMHMM. This connected with me because I liked this girl but we could never go out and this just gave me calmness when I heard it on MMHMM 7.5/10

5. Over Thinking [acoustic] - This is by far the best song on the EP and far better then I thought it would be. The original was always a favorite of mine but this has even bumped that down. A must download if you can find it, even if you donít like this kind of music or band. The best part is the guitar and vocals. The guitar carries the lyrics and the drums round up the song just like you would expect. 10/10

6. In like a Lion (Always Winter) - The booklet says this song is inspired by the book The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe by C.S. Lewis. Seeing as Iíve never even heard of this book I can't tell you if it's true. What I can tell you is this song is the second best on this EP and the best new track on this EP. I donít really know what to say about this song. It is just the way you would expect a slow song to be. It connects with me, and I just effing realized it. 10/10

7. The Thief - We finally get to the end of this EP and Iím glad I paid the 10 bucks to get this because this is the kind of CD you can play whenever you want. This is the shortest song but it leaves you wanting more. Any band thatís leaves you wanting more is always a good band.

~~~

Some may call me biased for this, but this record gets a 5/5. Why some people may ask. Well that have found their sound and have expanded on it perfectly. The doubters might still doubt and the disrespecters might still disrespect, but who cares? The drums and guitars are played right to fit in with the vocals. Even if you donít like this type of music, download one of my must hearís.

*~*Must hear*~*

Over Thinking [Acoustic]
In like a lion (Always Winter)
The Truth

*Pros*

Vocals
songs they picked to do acoustic versions of
it was only 10 dollars

*cons*

Iím in school
Iím tired
it was only 10 dollars

My second review for the site, tell me what you thought of it.



Recent reviews by this author
Onward To Olympas This World Is Not My HomeGreeley Estates No Rain, No Rainbow
brokeNCYDE I'm Not a Fan, but the Kids Like It!Decyfer Down Crash
The Sleeping What It TakesArise And Ruin Night Storms Hailfire
user ratings (91)
Chart.
3.5
great

Comments:Add a Comment 
Storm In A Teacup
November 14th 2005


13161 Comments


:eek:


no

Arrakakaka
November 14th 2005


685 Comments


All I an say is;


BIASED!

Keep on tryin'.

Rudd13
November 14th 2005


952 Comments


I'd say for a second review, it isn't bad. Again, more detail would help you out a lot on here, but it seems like that's what you're aiming for. As for the band......ehhhh.

I highly doubt this deserves a "classic" score. I'll give a shot at one track since I'll admit there's been one or two songs by the band that's caught my ear once before. Hey, someone had to say it.

NEDM
November 14th 2005


1113 Comments


I liked the intro but there is no way on God's green earth that a Relient K album is in any way, shape, or form... classic. They're pretty lame that they have three guitars and can hardly play to the suffiency of one.

Electric City
Staff Reviewer
November 14th 2005


15743 Comments


Relient K? 5? No. Never. Ever.

Bad review, keep trying.

Digging: Flying Lotus - You're Dead!

Rudd13
November 14th 2005


952 Comments


[quote=Official]Bad review, keep trying.[/quote]

With all due respect, you're being a bit harsh, Official. This is only the user's second review, and I think for that standard, it was a decent review. Your second review wasnt exactly on the "outstanding" side either. ;)

NEDM
November 14th 2005


1113 Comments


But the thing is Rudd, his first review was exceptional.

Thor
November 14th 2005


10200 Comments


No...just....no....

This band will never achieve anything of classic status.

Electric City
Staff Reviewer
November 14th 2005


15743 Comments


[quote=Rudd]With all due respect, you're being a bit harsh, Official. This is only the user's second review, and I think for that standard, it was a decent review. Your second review wasnt exactly on the "outstanding" side either.[/quote]

Oh I completely understand Rudd. I know my second was terrible, I have no problem admitting that. I'm just saying there's a lot of room for improvement.



Rudd13
November 14th 2005


952 Comments


his first review was exceptional.


Well then by all means, thats good for him!

But as he's still somewhat new to the site, it's okay for him to undergo a bit of a dip in effort. That not even being the real point here. Dip or not, Official should try restraining himself from comments like that to someone that clearly showed effort in the review.This Message Edited On 11.14.05

Rudd13
November 14th 2005


952 Comments



^ Of course.

No hard feelings, mate. It's all understood.

Electric City
Staff Reviewer
November 14th 2005


15743 Comments


I apologize Rudd, I thought he had done more.

Anyway on the review, to be more specific, if you're going to do a track by track, try to add much more detail. Try to put in at least 4 lines of material.

Zebra
Moderator
November 14th 2005


2647 Comments


If you're going to do a review you need more detail period. For a track by track you need a lot more detail about each track, I can't say that this review was helpful. Next time try adding more detail to every track.

encmetalhead
November 14th 2005


744 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

yeah sorry for lack on info i was doing it at school so i couldn't listen to the songs while doing the review i'll see what i can do with editing...

edit: it's editedThis Message Edited On 11.14.05

Zebra
Moderator
November 14th 2005


2647 Comments


Better, but a more detailed closing paragraph is needed.

encmetalhead
November 15th 2005


744 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

edited

encmetalhead
November 19th 2005


744 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

bump

innerdark
November 19th 2005


749 Comments


this, for a second review, is a great example, you've got the basics, it's a bit short, but that'll come with practise,

everyone, lay off him , he's done a good job, my second review sucked this, for a second is exceptional,

keep writing reviews, because with this as a second, i think you can do great things for the site

mattego16
December 23rd 2005


2 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Sploop

encmetalhead
January 17th 2006


744 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

bumpage



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy