King's X
Ear Candy


4.5
superb

Review

by Dogman USER (2 Reviews)
March 15th, 2010 | 8 replies


Release Date: 1996 | Tracklist

Review Summary: In the words of the members themselves, this was an album full of hits that their label demanded. Does that take away from the songwriting ability, musicianship and subtle complexities that King's X is known for? Not one bit.

So maybe King's X WAS under heavy label pressure to create an album full of hits when they wrote 1996's Ear Candy, but did that stop them from losing their signature sound? No. In the words of bassist/vocalist dUg Pinnick, "We gave them hits." Though the band feels they did supply the label with ample amounts of radio-friendly tunes, it didn't take away from the quality songwriting and musicianship that King's X came to be known for.

What Ear Candy does best is have a completely unique sound that no other album in 1996 had. The crunchy, melody-laden guitar was there, the thick, bottom-ended bass was there, the pocket-style drumming was there, and last but not least, the soulful vocals were there, but it still managed to stand apart from everything else out at the time.

On songs like Thinking and Wondering (What I'm Gonna Do) and A Box, frontman dUg Pinnick struggles with the hardships of life, making choices on what he wants to do with himself, and how he wants to break free from this metaphorical box that his then-current religion had him locked in. On slower songs such as Lies in the Sand (The Ballad of...), guitarist/vocalist Ty Tabor wonders what religion is really about, with lines like 'There's a man / Who says there's a light in the sky / All my friends say he's telling a lie / But he speaks with such passion that I have to think about.' Drummer/vocalist Jerry Gaskill also gets a song on this album, entitled American Cheese (Jerry's Pianto), one his 3 solo-written songs in the King's X catalogue (bonus points to who can name the other 2).

Overall, the album never really loses steam (maybe because the first song is called The Train?), though the 2nd half seems to have the slower songs on the album. There are minimal to zero weak spots to find throughout the entire CD, but are there ever any in a King's X album?


user ratings (90)
3.6
great
other reviews of this album
amateur grammar vigilante woodtouching over the sanctity of what things are *supposed* to mean (3)
A band in search of themselves....

PsychicChris (4.5)
The most underrated album from the most underrated band...



Comments:Add a Comment 
bungy
March 15th 2010


9009 Comments


Nobody here listens to King's X, it's a shame.

TheFourthAmigo
March 15th 2010


29 Comments


I tried, they didn't seem anything special. I'll have to give this another go-around.

Dogman
March 16th 2010


4 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

You really should. By far the most under-rated band of all time, just ask any credible musician.

random
March 16th 2010


3148 Comments


I listen to King's X, and they're great.

deliberately
March 21st 2010


187 Comments


i've never listened to King's X, should i check them out?

random
March 27th 2010


3148 Comments


Yes.

gocsa666
August 4th 2011


474 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

A really, really, really good album. And everybody should listen to King's X. EVERYBODY.

Davil667
April 29th 2014


4046 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Review summary nails it. Album rulez!



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy