Gavin Castleton
Covers


4.0
excellent

Review

by cfbassist USER (2 Reviews)
February 27th, 2010 | 7 replies


Release Date: 2009 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Gavin Castleton does justice to these nine classics by straying the line between staying true to the original song and making them his own.

I have never been a big fan of covers...especially studio recordings of covers. I have always felt (and preached in my own band) that audience members pay to hear/see YOU, not you pretending to be another artist.). So imagine my horror when my favorite artist, who could do no wrong in my eyes decided to release a cover album. I mean, his youtube video covers were awesome-mainly because he would do them with a loop pedal and in one take- but an entire album!? So put off by the ideas of covers I didn't even attempt to listen to this album for months. I finally listened to some tracks posted on youtube and fell in love with one, leading to a friend hooking me up with the album.

Let's just say I need to give Gavin the full price of this album, as it changes my mind completely about covers. Straying the line perfectly between "staying true to the original" and "making the song his own" this album is mind boggingly good. One of the better examples of his creative touches is the "Come To Me" cover (originally by Bjork). Gavin keeps much of the original atmosphere and melodies, but throws them over a fat dubstep drum and bass rhythm. It's a bit shocking at first, but after repeated listens it all falls into place. Another standout, Ben (do I even need to say who did the original) is probably the song I was most worried about. I rate the original to be one of better songs of the century, and believe that the song could only get worse if attempted by somebody else. While this version of Ben won't bring birth to another king of pop, it definitely deserves respect. Rather than try to (and most likely fail to) capture MJ's vocal performance from the original, Gavin instead gives the song a more complex piano line, providing emotion where his voice can not.

The only real complaint I have with this album, is the lack of full production techniques. The drums sound cheesy at times, and sometimes I feel myself wishing for more "sound" from a song. This is made up for usually with a really nice fat bass synth sound present on most of the songs, giving the songs the "oomph" that the drums and limited instrumentation can't.

This album once again shows Gavin Castleton should be much more famous than the other Gavin (Degraw) and should be making the big bucks with other pop stars. There's no real weak track here, and the mood from track to track flows perfectly (surprisingly for a cover album). From the opening bells of Imagine to the closing piano notes of Ben the album brings you along for the ride.


user ratings (3)
Chart.
4.5
superb
related reviews

Home

Comments:Add a Comment 
cfbassist
February 27th 2010


330 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

album artwork isn't working??

Knott-
Emeritus
February 27th 2010


10197 Comments


then =/= than, wtf does this have to do with gavin degraw and this is really only 1 paragraph long - i understand that a covers album is more difficult to write about but there's not really enough material here to justify a full review.

cfbassist
February 28th 2010


330 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

sorry kind of did a speed write (about the typos), the gavin degraw statement was an attempt at
humor, as far as length, I've seen FAR shorter, but if you want a more in depth review I have one.




Knott-
Emeritus
February 28th 2010


10197 Comments


Haha, the DeGraw thing was just a wtf moment for me. Didn't really fit at all, especially given they're total polar opposites in the pop arena.

You might have seen shorter but I'm just saying, there's only really one paragraph of substance to this. It's a covers album, so I get that there's probably not an overwhelming to say, but describing Castleton's approach and general sound (tough, I know) would be useful for listeners that haven't heard of him before.

Given how much I enjoy Home I need to check this guy's back catalogue out but that starts with Bullet, I think. I've heard good things in that direction.

cfbassist
February 28th 2010


330 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I've been trying to write shorter reviews as of late after I wrote one for a blog that bordered on dissertation length, so saying it needs to get a bit longer is fine to me, thats why i went back in and added another paragraph, and yea this album is tough because I am not a fan of half of the originals so I have no base comparison.

Anywho, his entire back catalog (including the band gruvis malt) is pretty solid, dark age probably being the weakest, and either hospital hymns or Bullet being the best.

Lions
February 28th 2010


1015 Comments


this album's pretty neat. Bullet rules; need to check out the other stuff. namely for the love of pete, because i heard one song from it and it was super solid. guy needs more love, overall.

JeffBowde
March 2nd 2010


7 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Home is the shit. Changed my whole perspective on music. Simon and Maximum Unicorn (by his band Gruvis Malt) are also incredible bodies of work. Nice review, I wish I'd gotten a copy of that Covers CD but I was a day late and a dollar short.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy