Dangers
Messy, Isn't It?


4.0
excellent

Review

by Rationalist USER (50 Reviews)
January 10th, 2010 | 63 replies


Release Date: 2010 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Overall, this is a harrowing descent into the minds of the band members of Dangers. The music is enthralling and accomplishes the feat of being bellicose yet accessible simultaneously.

Sincerity is a rather difficult thing to find nowadays, as everyone is well aware that there is a multitude of persons who are entirely to impressionable, or entirely too concerned about what others think about their actions and or opinions. But, in stark contrast to the category of humans portrayed here, there have been the lyricists in post-metal and hardcore bands that have often frowned in shame at the sight of this herd mentality. Not only do they verbalize their concerns for this world of humans that has gone amiss due to the acquisition of iniquity and ignobleness, but they act upon their beliefs by protesting and elucidating their opinions. And whilst Dangers' debut LP, Anger, expressed more anger towards intolerance with a cynical bite, their sophomore effort allows their opinions to be explained in a much more mature way.

While tracks like "No Vonneguts, No Glory" are obvious anthems against the Iraq war and ignorance, others like the aptly titled "Stay-At-Home Mom" explore the melancholy and apathy expressed by a, well... stay-at-home mom. A variety of subjects are expressed on this album, rarely ever revisiting the same topic twice. And though the lyrical execution is not of the poetic variety by any means whatsoever, the message is clear as crystal, and reflects the band's slovenly approach to music.

The guitars are dissonant and show the band's vehemence. They empower the message behind the music like the raucous screams. The vocalization here embodies the same musical elements that the guitars do. And together, these bellicose instruments add to the band's perspective as a whole, and are generally talented. This is not to say that the bassist and drummer are not talented, they are just more discreet in their presence, as the bass is used appropriately as a foundation to this unadulterated aural assault, and the drums are just competent, nothing groundbreaking, but nothing disappointing either. They add to this aggression, but their additions are not as noteworthy as the guitars and vocals. And when incorporated into the tracks that occupy Messy, Isn't It, each element of the music shines, thus leading to a more enjoyable experience.

Tracks along the lines of “Check, Please” are speedy bursts of pugnacity in aural form, while “Pyramid of Emptiness” taps into the band's sense of anguish. Exigency is never lost on any track, even the two interludes, “Messy, Isn't It?” and “Love Poem.” The latter of these tracks is a serene soundscape occupied by voices that express love like Nietzsche, a cynic's delight. Somehow, this track is extremely intriguing, and holds as much urgency as “Check, Please” has. “Stay At Home Mom” also portrays a bellicose nature and strong sense of urgency, as well as the untidy aural arrangement that this album exhibits superbly throughout its duration. And through its duration, it becomes clear that there are several moments on this album that are portentous of it being revered later in the future.

From its sloven, abrasive, vehement approach to musical expression, to its competent musicianship and provocative lyrics, this album an excellent follow-up for any hardcore band. This pugnacious aural assault is pure and never contrived, and focuses on issues that effect the entire world. These topics range from marriages that are not founded on love, to anti-war protest songs that are as cathartic as they are important to the album. And the instrumentation follows in suit. Aggressive power chords are as common as the relentless vocalization, and every instrument is made to fit the lyrical content of the song. All of these elements contribute a great deal to the quality of the album, which is an enthralling joy ride through the minds of the members of Dangers.

FINAL RATING-4.1/5-Overall, this is a harrowing descent into the minds of the band members of Dangers. The music is enthralling and accomplishes the feat of being bellicose yet accessible simultaneously.



Recent reviews by this author
The Radio Dept. Clinging to a SchemeThe Chariot Wars and Rumors of Wars
Alcest Souvenirs D'Un Autre MondeMetric Fantasies
Henryk Gorecki Symphony No. 3, Op. 36The Locust New Erections
user ratings (485)
3.9
excellent
other reviews of this album
SeaAnemone (4)
Intense, isn't it?...

pixiesfanyo (4)
Dangers make diverse and technical changes to their sound resulting in their best overall record....



Comments:Add a Comment 
SeaAnemone
January 10th 2010


21429 Comments


you did this bettter than me

Rationalist
January 10th 2010


880 Comments


Yay, then pos' mothufookah! I had a bad feeling about posting this, but I hope it gets "featured"...

joshuatree
Emeritus
January 10th 2010


3744 Comments


i've decided i will get this now

AliW1993
January 10th 2010


7511 Comments


i really need to hear this. great review

thebhoy
January 10th 2010


4460 Comments


good to see you curtail some of your more extrenuous vocabulary. It makes the review read much smoother.

Electric City
January 10th 2010


15756 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

album's fantastic, great start to 10

Rationalist
January 10th 2010


880 Comments


@thebhoy: I used all that on my Kayo Dot review.
@electric: What does great start to 10 mean?
@aliw: thank you. This album is as good as the review, if that helps.
@joshua: Get it.
@Iai: That's sad, because there are several staff reviewers who really don't show why they got the position (not sure if you are one of them, as I've never read one of your reviews). I won't name names, but that's just my opinion.

Electric City
January 10th 2010


15756 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

2010*



and all the staff are deserving of their positions

Rationalist
January 10th 2010


880 Comments


They may have written some good reviews in the past, but I've seen some really really bad reviews posted by staff reviewers. I can give you links to some I think are really bad if you want. But as I said, this is my opinion, and others are going to disagree.

Ulsufyring
January 10th 2010


1748 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

rationalist would you get off of your high fucking horse and stop talking like you're any better than anyone here? seriously some of your reviews are so mechanical and stale i have trouble reading two sentences of them. before you go lecturing about people who have been here for awhile and earned their reputations (note: staff reviewers got their spots for being good not just at writing, but being nice people as well) try being humble for one minute







Relinquished
January 10th 2010


48701 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Artwork makes me feel uneasy.

Ulsufyring
January 10th 2010


1748 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

heh yeah

Rationalist
January 10th 2010


880 Comments


@ulsurfying: I'm not trying to say that, "Oh my goodness, I'm better than any reviewer here because I make odd comparisons and follow the same structure every time I write and use big words and almost never refer to myself in the first person." I am simply stating that I dislike several staff reviews and do not understand why several of these staff reviewers are/were:

A.) Given their position
B.) So highly revered
C.) And lastly, if you say so, why staff reviewers are given their perks/position not only due to their writing skills, but because they are nice people as well. I highly doubt that every aptly revered writer in the world is humble and nice.

Yes, I will admit that I have read some reviews that are fantastic on the staff's part, and they blow my reviews away in subsequent action. However, these review(er)s do not fall into this category. There are, in my opinion, a surprising amount of reviews that are not up to par with the standards I set for those given contributor/staff position.

Ulsufyring
January 10th 2010


1748 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

what you try to say and what people will see you saying are two different things



if you wanted the question to any of those, you could ask them, instead of just shitting all over them passively

Rationalist
January 10th 2010


880 Comments


People like you because 25% of America is retarded. There. Go suck on that Chan.

joshuatree
Emeritus
January 10th 2010


3744 Comments


all those staff members are such bad reviewers ugh

SlightlyEpic
January 10th 2010


5810 Comments


that 25% doesn't post on sputnikmusic.com

Ulsufyring
January 10th 2010


1748 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

god cam why can't you be better ugh

Waior
January 10th 2010


11778 Comments


given the context, you'd think your arguments would be a little more rational

it's just false advertising.

joshuatree
Emeritus
January 10th 2010


3744 Comments


it's impossible to be a good reviewer unless you use the phrase "pugnacious aural assault " in your review everyone knows that



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy