Blank Dogs
Under And Under


2.0
poor

Review

by Alex Robertson STAFF
June 23rd, 2009 | 8 replies | 5,593 views


Release Date: 2009 | Tracklist

Review Summary: The Noise Punk and Lo-fi genres, both of which are getting less and less credible, get another kick in the face from this undercooked and banal album.

Despite his supposed anonymity, a listener can use context clues to figure out what kind of person Blank Dogs is. He’s a man who enjoys distorted guitars playing simple chords, sometimes in beat with or out of the rhythm of the rest of the instruments. He enjoys the simple 8-bit-esque saw wave synths, with their jarring texture and the ability to manipulate them with ease. He must also be a fan of that one vocal effect that makes it sound like your voice is speaking through an intercom or underwater, considering he uses it, you know, on every song on the entire album (I still can’t tell if it’s some kind of silly supplement to his “anonymous” persona, or some effect he found while messing around on his microphone or mixer). He doesn’t seem to like writing lyrics, or at least ones that are possible for the listener to hear. However, other than that, Blank Dogs is pretty much open for interpretation, pertaining to his identity and what kind of person he is. Pertaining to the album, it’s only the truth that Blank Dogs has conceived an entirely boring and mediocre album.

Starting off with “No Compass,” Under and Under adheres to the stereotype of modern “lo-fi” music with an irritatingly scratchy guitar part, muffled and indecipherable vocals, and a simple, pounding drumbeat. A listen to the following song, “L Machine,” doesn’t change anything either. Nor does the third track, “Night Night” (although fourth track “Open Shut” slightly modifies the formula with modest success). It goes on. The same whining synth and mangled guitar are always taking the front lines here, with Blank Dogs’ bland vocals taking somewhat of a backseat position. With one exception, the songs never allow themselves to stand out or do anything different, which leads to a monotonous and uninspiring listen. The exception mentioned above is the extremely enjoyable “Tin Birds,” which features typical shoegaze guitars (read: not distorted this time) and a simple drumbeat. It’s nothing original, but it works very well, especially when contrasted against the rest of the songs.

However, one song cannot save this exceedingly banal album from songs like “Setting Fire to Your House” and “Blue Lights,” both of which sound like some awful post-punk bastardization of 80’s dance music. The drum machine and synth combo doesn’t work especially on these two songs, evoking visions of some kind of creepy haunted-house disco.

Overall, Under and Under confirms everybody’s worst fears about the genre of Lo-fi, sacrificing enjoyable melodies for repetitive and uninteresting song structures that, in the end, succeed in alienating the listener and turning many potential fans away. Blank Dogs, if he expands his palette, could have something going here, but right now it’s a heap of undercooked tunes that are all carbon copies of each other.



Recent reviews by this author
Teebs E S T A R ATabu Ley Rochereau The Voice of Lightness: Congo Classics 1961-1977
Julia Holter Loud City SongNara Leao Dez Anos Depois
Thelonious Monk Thelonious Monk TrioZahava Seewald and Michael Grebil From My Mother's House
user ratings (10)
Chart.
3.1
good
recommended by reviewer
Wavves Wavvves
No Age Nouns

Comments:Add a Comment 
robertsona
Staff Reviewer
June 23rd 2009



14990 Comments


da fux wrong with the track list

robertsona
Staff Reviewer
June 23rd 2009



14990 Comments


also reviews kinda crappy and short and written really quickly but who cares album sucks anyway

Meatplow
June 23rd 2009



5524 Comments


This falls strongly in with the post-punk revival crowd, it feels really weird in description as lo-fi isn't really a genre to me.

This album is alright, I discovered it a couples of months back. I've given it 2 or 3 spins, and I could probably listen to it again. It certainly isn't that good though.

robertsona
Staff Reviewer
June 23rd 2009



14990 Comments


oh whatever i'm bad at genres i guess ill fix that hahahaha

lobby
September 4th 2009



1251 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

i'm on the 11th track and so far, it is really shit. probably end up being a 2, if it's lucky...

robertsona
Staff Reviewer
September 4th 2009



14990 Comments


tin birds is good tho

Bitchfork
February 27th 2011



7584 Comments


surfgaze right

robertsona
Staff Reviewer
February 27th 2011



14990 Comments


this is the worst shit ever



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2013 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy