The Decemberists
The Hazards of Love


4.5
superb

Review

by Iai EMERITUS
March 23rd, 2009 | 252 replies


Release Date: 2009 | Tracklist

Review Summary: In no uncertain terms: The Hazards of Love is clearly their best album, and the best of 2009 so far.

What must have been going through The Decemberists' heads as they came up with the idea for The Hazards of Love? Colin Meloy tried to put it in a clear and simple light - 'there’s an odd bond between the music of the British folk revival and classic metal, a natural connection between, like, Fairport Convention and Black Sabbath....I think there’s a shared sense of narrative and ambiance, of moving beyond the first person in your writing, and I thought it would be interesting to mess around with that.' - and sure enough, that rings true. Similarly, the press release offers up the explanation that this is 'a 17-song suite that tells the tale of a woman named Margaret who is ravaged by a shape-shifting animal; her lover, Williams; a forest queen; and a cold-blooded, lascivious rake.' Again, true enough.

But surely there's more to it than that. There are, after all, a raft of guest vocalists here, a move unheralded in the Decemberists catalogue. There's 17 tracks spread over roughly 70 minutes, and a span of styles and instrumentation that The Crane Wife didn't come close to, despite being heralded as a step forward into proggy and experimental territory for the band. Tellingly, it's a rock opera with genuine opera influences in its structure - there are recurring musical passages in play that weave throughout the album, and even one leitmotif taken from Picaresque's "From My Own True Love (Lost at Sea)", presumably intentionally. No band could have come up with a record like this without a lot of dedication and a lot of forward planning.

You know what my theory is? I think The Decemberists were bored with being part of the second division of their genre, both commercially and critically. I think they were bored with looking at the top tier of 21st century American indie bands, and wondering why they weren't on that same level despite being more talented than The Shins and having more melodic nous than the Arcade Fire. And I think they've taken a conscious decision to grab the world by its throat and tell it exactly why they're one of the best bands in the world.

It's worked. I will put this in no uncertain terms: The Hazards of Love is clearly the band's best album, and it will be a disgrace if it doesn't see them earning Album of the Year accolades.

For what it's worth, the concept behind The Hazards of Love is absolutely barmy. To expand on the press release, the story revolves around a couple made up of a human woman named Margeret (as sung by Becky Stark of Lavender Diamond), and her lycanthrope lover William, who haunts the forest by Margeret's home town. A raft of other characters - including a jealous rival for William's affections and a marauding murderer - seek to keep the couple from being together, despite Margeret bearing William's child. When you're inspired, you're inspired, I guess. Meloy apparently originally planned this as either an operetta or a musical, before quite sensibly deciding it wouldn't work and allowing the songs to grow organically. The storyline, then - sometimes hard to pick out, very easy to ignore entirely - becomes entirely secondary to the music. Music which, by the way, is frequently astounding.

The aforementioned link between metal and folk is what drives the album, with its centrepiece "The Wanting Comes in Waves" its finest expression. Built from three section that weave in and out of one another, the song goes through territory that ranges from Cream-esque riffs to Joanna Newsom-inspired harp, back to skyscraping backing vocals and pounding drums that recall Coldplay. It's the album in microcosm, but to treat it that way would be to overlook the fact that these 6 and a half minutes, briefly reprised later, represent the band's best single achievement yet. Outside it, other highlights abound - "Won't Want For Love"'s glammy stomp, "The Rake's Song"'s deliriously unhinged treatment of infanticide, and especially, "The Hazards of Love 4 (The Drowned)"'s Pink Floyd-esque closer, topped off by some exquisite steel guitar.

So it's glam, it's early metal, it's folk. The Hazards of Love, for its American grandeur and ambition, is a curiously British-sounding record - T. Rex, Black Sabbath, and Fairport Convention all offer equal parts of its make-up, with some subtle and not-so-subtle nods to acts like Iron Maiden, Genesis, Jethro Tull, and Queen, all acts who took their music, but not themselves, completely and utterly seriously, and who also loved to tell silly stories. That mentality is precisely what makes all this music work - there's sincerity, but it's always tempered by self-awareness and it never tips over in pretentiousness. This has always been true of The Decemberists to an extent (think of how camp, but how genuine, a song like "I Was Meant For The Stage" was), but here it really comes to the forefront and acts as the glue that holds this record together, far more than the concept does. Perhaps, in that regard, this is the album Colin Meloy was always destined to make.

At any rate, The Hazards of Love is shockingly good. Plenty of people will no doubt try to dismantle it, pointing to the silliness of the story, the loss of the direct and simple pop songs of Picaresque, the use of a children's choir at one point, or by claiming the band are out of their depth attempting metal. A lot of people will simply feel that they're trying too hard, too, but does it count as trying too hard if you succeed this spectacularly? This is an album that is great upon first listen and that just keeps getting better. Epic, beautiful music to get lost in; rock bands of 2009, you've got a lot to live up to.



Recent reviews by this author
Lana Del Rey ParadiseScott Walker Bish Bosch
Susanne Sundfor The Silicone VeilPepe Deluxe Queen of the Wave
iamamiwhoami KinThe Tallest Man on Earth There's No Leaving Now
user ratings (759)
3.8
excellent
other reviews of this album
SeaAnemone (4.5)
It becomes pretty apparent that this isn't The Decemberists we know and love. No, this is much bette...

thebhoy (3.5)
The wanting for something better comes in waves....



Comments:Add a Comment 
PuddleSwimmer
March 23rd 2009


1457 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I heard extreme opposite opinions on this



And since you make it sound very interesting, I'm going to end up buying this because I seem to be the worst at picking choice songs to download



I mean....buy on iTunes....sorry Obama

mx
Moderator
March 23rd 2009


752 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Fantastic album

Chewie
March 23rd 2009


4544 Comments


man this year is delivering

DaveyBoy
Emeritus
March 23rd 2009


22500 Comments


This sounds really really interesting. Excellent review Nick... Although I am uncertain the "it will be a disgrace if it doesn't see them earning Album of the Year accolades" is really required when the year isn't even a quarter of the way done.


korraeswai
March 23rd 2009


56 Comments


Hmmm. is it worth a look if i haven't loved their other material? Great review by the way.

Xxplosive
March 23rd 2009


126 Comments


Entertainment Weekly disagrees lol.

Not my kind of music, but great review as usual.

mx
Moderator
March 23rd 2009


752 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

EW, that noteworthy authority on indie music

Knott-
Emeritus
March 24th 2009


10260 Comments


This has given me the desire to give it another shot.

I tuned into the radio today and they had a piece on about it but seeing as the sample they played was from the latter parts of the album I didn't recognise it and just said, "sounds quite like the new decemberists album." the radio review also said it was freaking awesome.

SeaAnemone
March 24th 2009


21429 Comments


hmph... stupid staff reviews, similar yet better than mine. good review though, you pretty much reiterated what I was thinking in my review, yet more profoundly and convincingly.

itchyandscratchy
March 24th 2009


314 Comments


Yeah this album is pretty great but you guys it drags its feet so much for the first 5 or so tracks.

Knott-
Emeritus
March 24th 2009


10260 Comments


yeah OK then ffs.

this is REALLY good.

Kyle
March 24th 2009


667 Comments


Clearly their best album? Surely that entirely depends on whether you're into their change of direction.

I havn't given this enough time yet, but from the first few listens I can;t see me getting into this in a massive way. I mean, I appreciate what they're trying to do, but I prefer The Decemberists when they sound dreamy...Here I Dreamt I Was An Architect being the perfect example of this. Will give this a few more spins though.

itchyandscratchy
March 24th 2009


314 Comments


yeah OK then ffs.

this is REALLY good.


Is this directed at me, just wondering?


klap
Emeritus
March 24th 2009


12408 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

still listening but still can't see this as their best or even their second-best record. trying hard though

PuddleSwimmer
March 24th 2009


1457 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I'm going to sound stupid, but what does ffs mean?

natey
March 24th 2009


4195 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I think review overplays the quintessence of this album, but the album is really lovable.

itchyandscratchy
March 24th 2009


314 Comments


The Crane Wife blows this away in my opinion but other than that this is probably The Decemberists best album.

natey
March 24th 2009


4195 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I do prefer the Crane Wife myself. That record is just amazing.

itchyandscratchy
March 24th 2009


314 Comments


Very much so.

Altmer
March 24th 2009


5711 Comments


Folk? Metal? Indie? Prog? Where can I get this record and why didn't they always play this?



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy