Queen
Hot Space


2.5
average

Review

by gblackman USER (25 Reviews)
September 29th, 2008 | 30 replies


Release Date: 1982 | Tracklist

Review Summary: That’s where ‘1982’s’ “Hot Space” comes in. Of any of all ‘Queen’s’ efforts, this was the one where they tried to get rid of any lingering’s that was ‘Queen of the 1970’s.’

So, here it comes. What is referred to many as Queen’s ‘worst album.’ It basically finished off any following they had in America, and nearly destroyed them ‘worldwide,’ but after listening to the album (and taking my time to digest it in its entirety), then the one conclusion I can make is… you should never listen to the fans… well not all of them, anyway.

You could probably put Queen Fans into four different sections:

1. Those who just like the hits they hear on the radio,
e.g. “Bohemian Rhapsody,” “We will Rock you,” “We are the
Champion,” “Another one bites the dust,”

2. Those who collect all the albums religiously but aren’t too
keen on the hits because of too much radio exposure.

3. Fans that like the hit singles, and enjoy watching Queen live,
because they’re an entertaining live band.

4. Queenoholics, they buy all the albums (including
compilation, and live albums), probably been to some live
shows too.

Although these are distinctively different groups they all had one thing in common and that was they had an expectation from Queen’s music. It was usually a rock/pop based guitar/piano intro, that had a cool guitar solo in the middle, and usually the song would be catchy.

“The Game,” the bands previous effort to this, had included some elements of ‘funk music’ but they were layered in with typical Queen tracks such as “Play the Game,” and “Save Me,” that ended the album on a typical Queen manner. The biggest hit songs from that album, “Crazy little thing called love;” and “Another one bites the dust,” although a different style to what Queen had done before, they were still distinctively ‘Queen.’

That’s where ‘1982’s’ “Hot Space” comes in. Of any of all ‘Queen’s’ efforts, this was the one where they tried to get rid of any lingering’s that was ‘Queen of the 1970’s.’ They were determined to move with the times. And yes “Hot Space” does sound dated now but it’s a far superior effort to let’s say the dreadful “News of the World,” or “Jazz” albums, and one can argue it is better than “A day at the races,” for simply striving to be different.

Perhaps the albums biggest mistake is that if you think of Queen’s earliest efforts such as “Sheer Heart Attack,” and “A Night at the Opera,” then each was a progression towards the other. Whilst ‘Queen’ had reinvented themselves with ‘The Game,’ and seemingly the first cut from the album, ‘Under Pressure,’ (which was actually released in ‘1981,’ a year before “Hot Space” came out) then you recognise that the brilliant ‘David Bowie’ collaboration was actually a musical move forward from songs such as ‘Dragon Attack’ and ‘Another one bites the dust,’ and still remains to this day one of the bands best tracks.

As for the album ‘Hot Space’ though it becomes another ‘re-invention’ this time into more ‘electronic,’ and pure pop music, there are elements of classic ‘Queen’ later in the album, but strangely this is what turns out to be “Hot Space’s” main weakness.

And because it is a re-invention, like “The Game,” it has the same problems where some of the new sounds work better than the others. But perhaps the biggest let off for Queen fans was that whilst before, even on “The Game,” despite the new sound, there was still a ‘Brian May guitar solo,’ or ‘Queenesque,’ ‘Piano/Guitar anthem,’ all this has been replaced with pure ‘Pop Music,’ although admittingly not necessarily ‘bad Pop.’

The first track “Staying Power” therefore must have come as a huge surprise. It’s instant horn/sax solo that precedes the song, in the beginning and middle sections, was certainly a shock to the system, (even to me) and I had to check that this was an actual ‘Queen’ album when I first listened to it all those years back. Saying that, the song does get better with continuous listens, and despite it being their weakest opener since “Mustapha” on “Jazz,” it certainly isn’t as bad as some of the Queen fandom would have you believe.

“Dancer,” is just as good, and by the time it comes to this song the listener has usually adjusted to the new sound of the album. It’s about wanting to party, and have a good time, despite people not inviting you to their party. It has a similar sound to that of “Staying Power,” but more funk, and a brief ‘Brian May’ guitar solo in the middle.

The first great song on the album though is the funky “Back Chat.” It’s kind off an extension of “Another one bites the dust,” but with a bit more bite. It’s also good to hear John Deacon strut his stuff for a change like he did for “Bites the Dust” too. The song ends on a ‘Rolling Stone’ style rap where Freddie reinstates about people who talk about him behind his back. It kinda reminded me of the middle section of ‘The Stones’ ‘1978’ hit ‘Miss You.’

The next song ‘Body Language,’ is an electronic based song. It was the second single from the album, and divided many fans at the time of its release. And why could this be? Well I do have some theories. First, was its provocative sexual under text, (Although I can’t remember too many people complaining about Fat Bottomed Girls), the second was that it was a song made basically for the dance scene, and biggest crime of all… no Brian May or distinctive guitar solo.

Admittingly, the song isn’t that bad, it’s actually a good dance track, and is certainly not their worst ever single release, ‘Spread your Wings’ comes straight to my mind. The problem for die hard ‘Queen’ fans probably was that this wasn’t the Queen they were brought up with, for the casual fans, the song was probably a bit too risqué.

Also if you think about the general ‘Queen radio listening audience,’ it is unlikely that they ever bought a Queen album, (Except maybe Greatest Hits) and might have bought the odd single or two, but the problem is that ‘Greatest Hits’ represents an album of in some way or another ‘radio friendly’ Queen songs, and Body Language was hardly radio friendly. This means with this single alone they probably alienated their die-hard and casual audience in one blow.

Anyway, moving on, the first obvious filler of the album comes in the form of “Action this Day.” It attempts to be an anthem but sadly falls way short, not even the attempted, epic synthesizer effects of the middle section can save this one.

Another filler is “Put out the Fire,” which reverts the album back to the traditional Queen Pop/Rock sound, and although on the surface, it seems like a good rock song about banning guns, it has no actual long term redeeming features, and you eventually think back to Queen songs that did it better (Keep Yourself Alive, Now I’m Here, Fat Bottomed Girls).

“Life is real (Song for Lennon),” despite its good intensions, is sadly one of the weakest songs of the albums. It foolishly reverts back to the problems the band had with “News of the World,” and “Jazz,” where they would re-hash poor medley or ballad numbers that really weren’t sung with any heart or soul, and even when Freddie blurts out ‘Life is a bitch,’ it turns out too little, too late.

“Calling all girls,” is perhaps the weakest and aimless Pop song on the album. The song is basically repeating itself throughout about ‘some message’ but sadly can’t decide or care if the message is love or not, and at the end it just suddenly ends… Yeah whatever.

The album really lifts of with the brilliant “Las Palabras de amor (The Words of Love).” This is really a sweet song, and the synthesized, keyboard intro is a real gem too. It’s a Brian May written song in tribute to their South American fans and the gentle guitar parts in this are really to be treasured. It also feels like a extension of the “Love of my Life” live acoustic version that can be found on “Live Killers.”

“Cool Cat,” is average filler. Freddie does a decent soul impression and although it’s a decent version of soul music, that’s all the sound turns out to be, decent.

The album ends with the brilliant ‘David Bowie’ collaboration “Under Pressure.” I discussed this song earlier and I still stand that it’s definitely one of Queen’s strongest numbers. The song itself hit ‘number 1’ in the UK and many other territories, despite peaking at a disappointing ‘29’ in the US.

So that’s “Hot Space,” and here’s its ‘Hot’ recap.

STAYING POWER
Decent, if not good pop song. Shocks you first listen, but it does grow on you. 3/5

DANCER
As good as Staying Power, so it gets the same mark. 3/5

BACK CHAT
Cool beat, cool song. 4/5

BODY LANGUAGE
Different for Queen, although different isn’t necessarily bad. 3/5

ACTION THIS DAY
Falls a bit short of being an anthem. 2/5

LIFE IS REAL (SONG FOR LENNON)
Despite its good intentions, it’s still a bad song. 1/5

PUT OUT THE FIRE
Average, rock filler. 2.5/5

CALLING ALL GIRLS
A pitiful Pop song. 1/5

LAS PALABRAS DE AMOR (THE WORDS OF LOVE)
Wonderful song, one of the best on the album. 5/5

COOL CAT
Ok I guess, but only ok. 2/5

UNDER PRESSURE
One of Queen’s best songs. 5/5

That gives “Hot Space” a ‘Hot’ average of 2.86.

Compared to others.

Queen 2.7
Queen II 2.59
Sheer Heart Attack 3
A Night at the Opera 3.96
A day at the races 2.59
News of the world 2.4
Jazz 2.3
The Game 3.15

TO CONCLUDE

It was hard to decide what grade to give this, because I didn’t hate this album, I just felt there weren’t enough sparks in it. Yes a lot of the songs were good versions of Pop, but other than “Back Chat,” “Las Palabras de Amor,” and “Under Pressure,” there were no exceptional songs.

Saying that, it is a sad ‘Queen’ album too. After this, because of “Hot Space” being a commercial flop, the band would never dare to move forward with their music, and after this, it would be back to business as usual, in other words, just recycling what they had done before. Oh of course they’d still make some great songs, they always have, but “Hot Space” spelled the end of any ambition musically the band may have had.

2.5/5



Recent reviews by this author
Queen Queen on Fire: Live at the BowlQueen The Platinum Collection
Queen Greatest Hits IIIQueen Queen Rocks
Queen Made in HeavenQueen Live at Wembley '86
user ratings (521)
2.6
average
other reviews of this album
MasterSan (2)
Rightfully overlooked....

MrFahrenheit (4)
The last great Queen album........

Necrotica (3)
Queen's infamous dance album? RUN FOR YOUR LIIIIIIVES! Actually, it's surprisingly not that bad....



Comments:Add a Comment 
Erratic
September 29th 2008


1120 Comments


In before neg.

NortherlyNanook
September 29th 2008


1286 Comments


in before flames

I get the feeling he wrote all these reviews before posting any of them.

Tits McGee
September 29th 2008


1874 Comments


sexy cover art

SnackaryBinx
September 29th 2008


2309 Comments


i give up, the troll has gotten me.

Epilogue
September 29th 2008


1817 Comments


AIDS

Erratic
September 29th 2008


1120 Comments


So that’s “Hot Space,” and here’s its ‘Hot’ recap.


That gives “Hot Space” a ‘Hot’ average of 2.86.


no no no no no no

Athom
Emeritus
September 29th 2008


17244 Comments


ugh, not hot.

NortherlyNanook
September 29th 2008


1286 Comments


Funny, the part about what you quoted that I disliked the most was that he did the recaps again and did one of those damn calculated averages again.

Windows
September 29th 2008


76 Comments


Why do all these horrible reviews get to stay on the site yet I can't review a single which has two songs that appear on no other record.

violator1990
September 29th 2008


13 Comments


^they're not that horrible. They have problems. Like grammar could be better and maybe he could put the recap at the beginning of the review (if it means that much to him or her) cos I was into it then... bam recap, he just says the same thing twice.

I did vote yes though cos he made some good points, I'm gonna read his others for a laugh... eventually. This Message Edited On 09.29.08

DaveyBoy
Emeritus
September 29th 2008


22500 Comments


gblackman, which part about "do not post a review when you still have another review on the front page" do you not understand...??? It really isn't that difficult to understand, but I will indeed clarify it for you if you have for some reason failed to understand it the last 9 times it has been told. All you have to do is ask...

sickofantsid
September 29th 2008


129 Comments


no no no no no no


'no no no no no'

marksellsuswallets
September 29th 2008


4884 Comments


This marks the first time I have seen Davey get flustered with somebody...haha...

DaveyBoy
Emeritus
September 29th 2008


22500 Comments


Nah Brent, I am not flustered. I am actually starting to believe that he doesn't understand what feedbackers have been talking about with regards to posting multiple times & he is simply too embarrassed to ask.
Well, I don't really believe that, but just in case that is actually the case, I am offering my assistance.

violator1990
September 29th 2008


13 Comments


Yeah give other guys a chance.

I think he's from England, so maybe now he's asleep, so whatever we say falls on deathears.

So I'm gonna write on all his reviews and just say... one a day please!!!

You're not the only one who wants to review something.

it's www.sputnikmusic.com not www.gblackman.com



foreverendeared
September 29th 2008


14720 Comments


gblackman
reviews:12
approval: 14%

Hewitt
September 29th 2008


371 Comments


I think he just doesn't really care.

marksellsuswallets
September 29th 2008


4884 Comments


I don't think he doesn't understand, I think he just doesn't really care...haha when you say "what part of ____ don't you understand???" it sounds flustered...He probably wrote all these before he joined (as stated by Northerly I believe) so maybe when he reviews MJ's entire discography or w/e it will be a bit better (one can hope)

sickofantsid
September 29th 2008


129 Comments


it's www.sputnikmusic.com not www.gblackman.com


I thought it was 'Queenoholics' anonymous.

violator1990
September 29th 2008


13 Comments


I don't thnk they're that bad marksellsuswallets he just needs to realise there's loads of Queen fans that like Queen and will be annoyed about what he wrote.

Some of the stuff he says is true, even if he is OTT and is done more for entertainment puposes.

Still he should do something other than Queen, yeah finish all their stuff if he wants (how do we know he's a he??). But try and fix some stuff and try out something different with your format.

I think he sticks with this because he did it for the 1st album, so he's gotta do it for all. If he changes he may feel that he'd be cheating himself or something, which kinda makes sense.

Although, I'd like to know why Queen was his first choice cos he does have a cool album collection. Check out alot of top 100 album lists and alot of the albums are in his ratings.

So I think he knows his stuff, but just doesn't need to be such a brat about it.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy