AC/DC
For Those About to Rock We Salute You


2.0
poor

Review

by Pedro B. USER (303 Reviews)
July 4th, 2005 | 44 replies | 15,809 views


Release Date: 1981 | Tracklist


�Back In Black�. One of the top 5 best-selling albums in rock�n�roll history, and unanimously considered a rock masterpiece. It�s gotta be hard to follow it up, right? Right. AC/DC�s next album, �For Those About to Rock�� is as wildly inconsistent as it is entertaining.

Don�t get me wrong, �FTATR� has its moments. Songs like �C.O.D.� or the unmistakable title track are among the best the group composed, particularly during the 80�s. The problem? They�re surrounded by such unabashed filler as �Snowballed�, �Breaking The Rules� and the appalling �Night Of The Long Knives�.

Along with the group�s songwriting, which is starting to sound more than a tad generic, another problem of this album is its somewhat inadequate production. The whole sound is a bit tiny, which is surprising since �Mutt� Lange was once again responsible. Brian�s voice is also in much worse condition than on �BIB�, and what�s worse � Angus�s riffs lack the �crunch� they were always characterized for. On this album, the eccentric lead guitarist goes for a more melodic approach, evident on the title track and on follow-up �I Put The Finger On You�. Which takes us to the lyrics. What used to be double entendres in Bon Scott�s time are now straightforward �single entendres�. C�mon, �Put The Finger On You�? What can be more obvious than that?!

But the biggest flaw here, as I said, is the songwriting. All in all, �FTATR� has three good songs � the title track, �Put The Finger On You� and �C.O.D.� - two passable ones - �Let�s Get It Up� and �Evil Walks� - and the rest is just pure uninspired filler. Some of the songs boast good details here and there � the chorus on �Inject The Venom�, the solo on �Snowballed� - but overall that is not enough to capture our attention.

So, all in all, this album makes us think maybe �BIB� and �H2H� were flukes. Musically, I mean. Because this album is neither as immediate as �BIB� nor as crunchingly in-your-face as �H2H�. It takes us back to the days of �Powerage�, and ends up adding a few of the touches that would characterize later offerings from the group. Bottom line: it�s a somewhat insipid album, recommended to fans and completists only. The rest would do better to buy �Back In Black�.



Recent reviews by this author
Big Ball Hotter than HellChosen Resolution
Werefox I Am MemorySound City Players Sound City: Real To Reel
Nirvana NevermindEnforcer Death By Fire
user ratings (533)
Chart.
3.4
great

Comments:Add a Comment 
masada
July 4th 2005


2733 Comments


Everything you said was true, nice and short.

Good review

Rudd13
July 4th 2005


952 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I MUST disagree with you completely, Im sorry. I think FTATR is a great Brian Johnson album, the title song itself has to be one of the most addictive songs out there. And Evil Walks, I Put the Finger on You, Lets Get it up, and Inject the Venom, for me are classics, im not particularly trying to make you look bad here at all, I just must speak my mind, because in my opinion, this album deserves better.

mranti
July 4th 2005


50 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

AC/DC is not the band to look for if you want prolific song design or thought-provoking lyrics, but as a band that hits hard and throws in a slow tune every now and then. To compare For Those About To Rock to Back In Black in such a negative light, I think you're giving in a bit to hype rather than what is actually there face value. I would say this album is among their best with the title track, "inject the venom", "i put the finger on you", and so on.

Jawaharal
July 4th 2005


1832 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

ya I don't like this one that much


SouthernRocker
July 5th 2005


12 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

This album was pretty poor i was disapointed for sure but it is hard to follow up after a great cd.
This Message Edited On 07.05.05

angusmaster
July 5th 2005


23 Comments


The only song on there i really like is For those about to rock , and all the other songs are pretty average.

masada
July 5th 2005


2733 Comments


and all the other songs are pretty average.


That's basically most of AC/DC's material.


DownPaymentBlues78
October 17th 2005


278 Comments


Not at all Eliminator.

This one, Brian Johnson's voice reached its high point. Which gives this album something no other by AC/DC has. FTATR(WSY), I Put the Finger on You, Let's Get it Up, Evil Walks are the truly great ones on here.

kolzig33189
October 17th 2005


335 Comments


you might want to change the year cuz this didnt come out in 2005

DownPaymentBlues78
October 17th 2005


278 Comments


Haha good point.

Try 1981

Bonzo17
December 28th 2005


92 Comments


back in black surely was better but his wasnt bad, the song though...what brilliance

Rory says yes
March 10th 2006


24 Comments


Whys everyone saying that this isnt a good successor to back in black?! The title track has to be one of their best songs!

MyRamona
March 24th 2006


1075 Comments


I borrowed this from a mate, there were no stand-out tracks.

hard_rocker89
March 25th 2006


278 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Hey can you change the freakin' release date please? What a n00b.

Anyway, this album is ok. Not one of my favorites. But they're one of my favorite bands!

mybrotherthecow
April 7th 2006


79 Comments


this bands drummer isnt very good
good review

Two-Headed Boy
April 7th 2006


4527 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

This band isn't very good.

Iluvatar
Staff Reviewer
April 7th 2006


16088 Comments


AC/DC=Most overrated band of all time FTW!

Nothing stood out about them besides some good energy. It's too bad Jim Bruer does a better AC/DC than AC/DC did.This Message Edited On 04.07.06

DownPaymentBlues78
April 7th 2006


278 Comments


Oh please. Most overrated? With boy bands in the 90s and garbage like My Chemical Romance and Simple Plan running around today?This Message Edited On 04.07.06

Iluvatar
Staff Reviewer
April 7th 2006


16088 Comments


Do you think in 25 years people will be citing those bands as classics, or even (ugh) the greatest band of all time? I submit that they will not.

Aeaon
April 7th 2006


188 Comments


Alright album, but nothing beats what the band did with Bon Scott.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy