Bad Religion
Into the Unknown


2.5
average

Review

by username345 USER (52 Reviews)
August 19th, 2008 | 10 replies


Release Date: 1983 | Tracklist

Review Summary: An enjoyable listen if you can ignore the terrible production, cheesy synth effects and poor musicianship.

‘Into the Unknown’ is the only Bad Religion album not to have been re-released and according to the band, never will be. Only 10,000 copies were distributed and nearly all were quickly sent back. Bad Religion don’t go as far as denying that the album exists but if asked about it they will say no more than ‘listen to it yourself and you will see why we hate it so much.’

The aptly named ‘Into the Unknown’ was released in 1983, a year after their immensely popular hardcore punk debut album, ‘How Could Hell Be Any Worse’. Instead of creating another punk album though, Bad Religion went in the complete opposite direction and made exactly what punk was meant to be rebelling against, a progressive rock album. Obviously this wasn’t exactly a popular choice with their fanbase, but ‘Into the Unknown’, despite it’s numerous flaws, certainly isn’t as bad as many of them make it out to be.

The fast-paced stripped down guitar riffs that Bad Religion is known for are here substituted by overblown synthesisers and guitar effects. Most of the time, this very upbeat, bright and quirky 70’s prog style works quite well. There are plenty of catchy synthesiser hooks and melodies throughout the album with sing-along choruses in many of the songs. There are also some decent guitar and keyboard solos thrown in. While sometimes the long song-lengths seem a bit forced, they rarely become boring and the album finishes after just half an hour, long before it overstays it’s welcome. Acoustic guitars sometimes make appearances, giving certain songs a slightly folky sound. Some sections are actually surprisingly dark, contrasting the cheerful feel of the rest of the album well.

However, most of the album’s problems lie in it’s execution rather than the songwriting. During the recording of the first song, bassist Jay Bentley and drummer Pete Finestone left the band. They were replaced with Paul Dedona and Davy Goldman respectively, and neither of which are nearly as good musicians. The drumming in particular is very poor and slapdash. The hi-hats end up creating little more than an annoying wall of fuzz in the background. The bass is pretty average and is very prominent throughout. Even Gregg Graffin’s usually excellent singing is weak here and often off-key. His lyrics here are also very inconsistent, reaching the quality of his later work in certain songs like ‘Chasing the Wild Goose’, but sometimes sounding much more simplistic than usual.

The production especially is a huge problem. The album sounds sloppy and sludgy, with none of the instruments standing out amongst each other at all, giving the album a very dense sound. ‘Into the Unknown’ is also covered in laughably cheesy synth effects that would have sounded dated and out of place on a ‘60s psychedelic rock album, let alone an album from the 1980’s.

Despite it’s many flaws though, it is refreshing to hear Bad Religion, who are all too often accused of never doing anything new, create an album that is such a radical change it would make Ulver proud, even if it is probably one of the reasons they are now so afraid of deviating from their familiar sound. If you’re a Bad Religion fan and want to hear them do something completely different than usual this is a must, especially as the band state that they don’t care how you acquire it. If you can overlook it’s many flaws, there’s an enjoyable album hidden underneath.



Recent reviews by this author
Lamp of the Universe The Cosmic UnionThe Dukes Of Stratosphear 25 O'Clock
Electric Wizard Witchcult TodayPrince Paul A Prince Among Thieves
Camel RajazNick Cave and The Bad Seeds Let Love In
user ratings (188)
Chart.
2.7
average
other reviews of this album
xsanmoix (3.5)
...

!johnbetray~ (4)
...


Comments:Add a Comment 
Willie
Moderator
August 19th 2008


16149 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I enjoy this album. You can't listen to it when you want to actually hear BR, but for a
simple, catchy and fun album then you can't go wrong.

Bad Religion went in
the complete opposite direction and made exactly what punk was meant to be
rebelling against, a progressive rock album.
What better thing to rebel against
than a trendy rebellion ;)This Message Edited On 08.19.08

Digging: Mors Principium Est - Dawn Of The 5th Era

Masochist
August 19th 2008


8084 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Back in the early 80's, punk wasn't as trendy.

This album...good songs and bad songs. The synth gets tiring half way through, because Greg used the same exact sound for every song except one ("Million Days," the only song without a synthesizer, and one of the best on the album, IMO). Still...every now and then, it makes for an enjoyable listen, and a passable divergence from the Bad Religion of today.

Good review, I agree with a lot of points made.

{EDIT} Hmmm...think I'll post that second paragraph as a Sound-Off...This Message Edited On 08.19.08

Willie
Moderator
August 20th 2008


16149 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I thought this review might get a little bit of chatter going. Apparently not.

username345
August 20th 2008


594 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Nobody pays attention to my reviews :p

My next one will be 'interesting' though.

Willie
Moderator
August 20th 2008


16149 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

You reviewed Psychotic Waltz so I'll always make an effort to read and comment your reviews.This Message Edited On 08.20.08

username345
August 20th 2008


594 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Thanks :D

MassiveAttack
March 20th 2010


2688 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Cheese effects are to much man...ugh

StrizzMatik
May 19th 2010


3229 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Album is so lolbad. I respect them for their middle finger at the punk scene but BR doing a prog Bruce Springsteen impression was and always will be a bad idea.

I have the vinyl though :D

Parallels
May 19th 2010


6643 Comments


this deserves better than a 2. album kicks ass, even if it isnt punk at all

StrizzMatik
May 19th 2010


3229 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

It's like when Spinal Tap tried to do the freeform Jazz Oddysey. People are good at some things and suck at others, and it's important to make those distinctions about your talents, something Bad Religion circa 1982 / 1998-2000 learned the hard way



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy