Radiohead
In Rainbows


3.0
good

Review

by Adam Downer STAFF
December 2nd, 2007 | 406 replies


Release Date: 2007 | Tracklist

Review Summary: What happened to Radiohead?

Oh Radiohead and your wacky antics. You've made us all cream ourselves by giving away your new album for free (sorry, "choose our own payment"), and made all the major labels scream bloody murder because no one else is making money off of your latest album, In Rainbows, but you. We applaud you as we legally download your album free of charge. When In Rainbows' judgement day comes, will this revolutionary distribution method be viewed as genius marketing, or merely a publicity stunt? It could go either way, since reports of Radiohead's revenue stretch into the tens of millions and giant masses of jobless teenagers now don't have to worry about the file sharing police bitching about the free music. To me, the Radiohead Generation and marketing scheme will be In Rainbows' greatest legacy, because if there's anything I'll remember about In Rainbows' other than the giant hullaballoo surrounding its ***-you-music-lords distribution, it's this: In Rainbows is a really disappointing album.

There are several reasons for this. Chiefly among them is that the notoriously rabid Radiohead fans blogged this album into mythical near-Chinese Democracy status: it's going to revolutionize Radiohead's sound, it's going to sound like OK Computer, no The Bends, no Kid A with guitars. Its coming out end of 2006, early 2007, late 2007, maybe 2008, oh *** NEXT WEEK! No album could possibly live up to the astronomical amount of hype In Rainbows received, so Radiohead get a reprieve there. However, they didn't help themselves by previewing nearly the entire album on tour in 2006. As members of the Youtube generation, every Radiohead fan had ample oppurtunity to listen to the album in full, and grow attached to the brilliant live recordings of 9/10 of In Rainbows's tracks. This creates a legitimate problem with In Rainbows: the production. Live, album finisher "Videotape" churns and swells with a chaotic minimalist melody that moves with a frenzy that threatens to lose control at any second. On In Rainbows, for whatever reason it's raped of all it's energy and made into a snoozer, as Yorke just plays the piano for 4 and a half minutes while loopy drums mark the downbeat. Similarly, "Open Pick" goes from a barn burner with electric backing to match Thom's paranoid whines to the unnecessarily acoustic "Jigsaw Falling Into Place", where the small sounding instrumentation makes Yorke sound alone on an island, shouting and crossing the line from paranoid to annoying.

In fact, all of In Rainbows is dominated by the voice of Thom Yorke, and the album suffers for it. Yorke's voice isn't strong enough to carry an entire album, as proven on his solo project The Eraser, and unfortunately In Rainbows at times sounds like The Eraser if Radiohead made it. No band member gets to do anything interesting at all, despite numerous assurances by the internet that guitars would return with a vengeance. Instead, the guitars are relegated to playing arpeggiated backing riffs or simple rhythmic lines in nearly every song. The lone moment when the guitars get to do something interesting, "Bodysnatchers", is ruined by low-fi production and Yorke's increasing lyrical senselessness. "I have no idea what I am talking about! I am trapped in this body and can't get out!" shouts Yorke nearly tunelessly, then later insisting that "This is the 21st century!" In Rainbows shows a stark dip in Yorke's lyrical potency, so sharp in songs of yore like "A Wolf at the Door" and "Karma Police". His love songs sound as though they hide a Gatsby-like obsession, like "House of Cards"' opening line "I don't wanna be your friend, I just wanna be your lover" and "All I Need"'s "I'm an animal trapped in your hot car". At times on In Rainbows, Yorke seems to have lost all relatability and has become the caricature his critics have made him out to be.

This isn't to say all the songs off In Rainbows are bad. In fact, most of them are solid tunes. "Weird Fishes/Arpeggi" shows a brief flash of brilliance that counters most of the problems In Rainbows comes with. It runs exactly like the live version, maintaining the drowning whirlpool the guitars create. Ed O' Brien's sole backup-vocal contribution propels the song past every other song off In Rainbows, and Yorke's lyrics aren't insane here, in fact they're actually quite sad. "Yeah everybody leaves if they get the chance" he sighs, and he actually sounds human this time. "Arpeggi" accentuates its position as the best song, but it still doesn't stand up to other highlights of Radiohead's career, which is the final issue with In Rainbows. The songs here range from the solid to the slightly more solid, but no song has that supreme power that makes every Radiohead album worthwhile, like "Pyramid Song" off Amnesiac or "There There" off Hail to the Thief. This makes In Rainbows come off sounding more like a side effort rather than a real album. As a landmark in marketing, In Rainbows will be remembered forever by the Radiohead Generation. As an album, I will remember it as a disappointment.

Recommended Tracks

Nude
Weird Fishes/Arpeggi
15 Step




Recent reviews by this author
Beach Slang Cheap Thrills On A Dead End StreetThe Men Tomorrow's Hits
Macintosh Plus FLORAL SHOPPEThe Dismemberment Plan Uncanney Valley
Justin Timberlake The 20/20 ExperienceThe Men New Moon
user ratings (4463)
Chart.
4.2
excellent
other reviews of this album
1 of
  • cagedbutterfly (3.5)
    Radiohead rises from the ashes of their past 3 albums and compose a beauty of a record....

    Ryder631 (5)
    After crafting songs of exquisitely Orwellian paranoia for over a decade, Radiohead give u...

    shauryapatel (4.5)
    What were the fans left with after the 'pay what you want' hype was cleared? The collectio...

    Justin Swope (5)
    In Rainbows is another breathtaking passage into the mind of Radiohead, presenting an exqu...

  • someguest (4.5)
    When I'm at the pearly gates......

    pye3214 (5)
    A modern classic and a must listen for everyone, not just Radiohead fans....

    Kuo (5)
    In conclusion this album is a classic, it is easily accessible to most listeners fan or no...

    Kiet Truong (4.5)
    An album that will most likely go down in history as Radiohead’s album that revolutioniz...

  • Alex Getter (4.5)
    Radiohead at their most intimate in years; In Rainbows is their own collection of "seducti...

    Tom Gellatly (4.5)
    An understated, consistently enjoyable album, In Rainbows feels like a wonderful comeback ...

    Nathan (4.5)
    Radiohead's unusual marketing ploy on In Rainbows may be what is most remembered looking b...

    Leslie W (4)
    Mesmerizing.......

  • Reckoner (5)
    A modern classic from the best band in the world....

    RJayZ (4.5)
    It's not easy writing a masterpiece. It's a lot less easy following one up....

    Brandon Garland (3.5)
    Although not as impressive as an Opeth album, Radiohead damn well tries to impress the Spu...

    Chris Baranowski (4.5)
    In Rainbows is beautiful in its simplicity and once again proves that Radiohead are the ki...

  • David James Young (4)
    An unpredictable record from the biggest unsigned band in the world....

    Daniel Incognito EMERITUS (4)
    Another continuation in the overall Radiohead style, and one which executes its design wit...

    Tyler Fisher EMERITUS (4)
    With the addition of a second disc, In Rainbows loses some flow but maintains the original...

    UncalledFor (4)
    May initially feel like a Let Down with No Surprises to be found (because it has Everythin...

  • Porter W. Richards (4.5)
    Dark. Disturbing. Lush, yet subdued. In Rainbows is everything fans hoped for....


Comments:Add a Comment 
Thor
December 2nd 2007


10200 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

This album was definitely good, but is overrated.

lunchforthesky
December 2nd 2007


1039 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

So basically you're winging that the songs are better live and calling it a review?

And calling this is a disappointment to Radiohead fans is pretty stupid when it's the first album since Kid A to actually meet expectations as a general reaction.

This isn't a bad review but neither is it good.

francesfarmer
December 2nd 2007


1477 Comments


Nice review for a total shit-cluster.

Electric City
Staff Reviewer
December 2nd 2007


15743 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8 | Sound Off

I'm saying that the album's a disappointment because the live previews were better than the album versions.


EDIT: @ lunch.This Message Edited On 12.02.07

Digging: Flying Lotus - You're Dead!

plane
Staff Reviewer
December 2nd 2007


6094 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

This review doesn't sit well with me for some reason until you actually start talking about the music. And yeah, the remarks about disappointment to Radiohead fans is a little naive considering the feedback the album has. I agree with a lot of the review, but you seem to be going for a shock value when there isn't really any to be had.
For some reason, I don't see the album as a disappointment, just a great record that isn't much beside that.

Electric City
Staff Reviewer
December 2nd 2007


15743 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8 | Sound Off

Well, the Radiohead fans I've talked to that aren't on sputnik think of the album as a disappointment, so thats why I included it. I might edit it a bit.

Edit: Fixed.This Message Edited On 12.02.07

Geedrummer
December 2nd 2007


607 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

i love the album, and so do the radiohead fans that i know. good review tho i do disagree

cbmartinez
December 2nd 2007


2525 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Album is sooooooooo good.

Serpento
December 2nd 2007


2351 Comments


Album is so overrated. Nice review, the comparison to The Eraser is spot-on.This Message Edited On 12.02.07

Geedrummer
December 2nd 2007


607 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

"No album could possibly live up to the astronomical amount of hype In Rainbows received,"

frances the mute did. it was better than expected

TheGreatD17
December 2nd 2007


1141 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

It's about time this gets a sub-4 review, great job.

Doppelganger
December 2nd 2007


3124 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Just about summed up my thoughts completely. Good review.

Aeaon
December 2nd 2007


188 Comments


I love Radiohead and quite frankly, your review was full of shit.

Electric City
Staff Reviewer
December 2nd 2007


15743 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8 | Sound Off

I love Radiohead too, and quite frankly, this album made me sad.

Merkaba33
December 2nd 2007


702 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I don't know, I think this album is pretty good. Your review was good though so you get my vote. Does anybody know what the names are of the two bonus tracks on hail to the thief?This Message Edited On 12.02.07

McP3000
December 2nd 2007


3941 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Negative on the rating

Electric City
Staff Reviewer
December 3rd 2007


15743 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8 | Sound Off

Did you neg on the rating?

Altmer
December 3rd 2007


5652 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

This album is booooooooooring.

Coming from an OK Computer fan.

TheGreatD17
December 3rd 2007


1141 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

you can't neg a review because you disagree, this was well written regardless of if you share the same opinions

bloodyBourne
December 5th 2007


21 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

awwwwww
so it wasn't what you expected
Don't have any expectations.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





FAQ // STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2014 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Privacy Policy