Streetlight Manifesto
Keasbey Nights


3.0
good

Review

by USER (38 Reviews)
July 30th, 2007 | 19 replies


Release Date: 2006 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Think Rancid re-recording Energy. Not a good sight now is it?

"There is absolutely no way of explaining the existence of the record you now hold in your hands without somehow offending, infuriating, confusing or alienating certain parties, so we won't even try. Please enjoy this for what it is."

It's almost as if Tomas Kalnoky was a steaming politician explaining his latest scandal that will get him impeached. As if, he's trying to justify the existence of such a record. Instead of what the rabid party members (in this case are the fans) want, Kalnoky has written his own agenda. But this time written in sponsor of the Streetlight party. Fans of the 90’s will recognize the dubious name of this album. BUT UNDER A DIFFERENT NAME?! OH GOD NO. As most ska or punk fans know, Tomas Kalnoky was the lead singer for the young group and primary song writer for Catch 22 and eventually Keasbey Nights before leaving the band in search for higher education. Kalnoky's vacancy was never filled, and the album was left in the shadows of obscurity . But now Tomas is back with a new band of his own, and even though they make some damn good ska on their own terms (see 2003‘s Everything Goes Numb) they chose to re-record the original Keasbey (which is coined as a classic by many including me). The result is mixed and despite the band (more like Tomas’) attempts to explain why he did this record, the creation of this record still makes many scratch their heads.

If you have listened to Keasbey Nights, there’s no doubt the main factor of your enjoyment was the production. It was a love or hate affair and most loved it. I for one loved it. Why? The answer is; the production helped make the album have that nostalgic feel to it and was a perfect snapshot of a group of kids just having some fun and recording a damn good ska album, nothing more nothing less. Tomas thought that the record needed to be re-recorded. While the idea raised more than a couple of eyebrows and evoked its fair share of anger, the record isn’t actually that bad. In fact it is a serviceable attempt at re-creating the magic of Keasbey Nights. To put it in short it’s not a terrible attempt of re-creating the album but it’s just not great or necessary for that matter.

The album now sounds much cleaner, as every instrument is more audible and cleaner than ever. Even though it sounds better, the music’s quality has decreased. The whole “recorded together live” vibe is thrown out all together. This time, the music seems more layered. In some parts this works out, but for the most part it falls flat and makes the songs more boring, lacking any energy whatsoever. Think of it this way; what if Rancid re-recorded Energy? Any luster the album once had would be gone. The reason is simple, mainly because both albums were just a bunch of kids having fun and both had enough energy to make up for the lack of resources. Increased production values diminish the edge the band once had.

The production values work out on a few of the tracks, especially where the remakes were needed. Walking Away especially sounds completely fresh and new. The tone of the bass is much more evident, the horns are more precise and dead on and the tapping of the drums seem more atmospheric, which all add to the already prominent jazz feel of the song. Riding The Fourth Wave really shows off the production values and as a result the song seems more fleshed out than before. From beginning to start the horn section takes it time and tries its best to hit those notes with the best tone, and the thought out flute and acoustic accompaniment is a nice touch. In between the good remakes, there is a heap of songs that have been butchered by the remake. The most notable songs to be butchered are 9mm And Three Piece Suit and As the Footsteps Die out Forever.

Then there’s Tomas Kalnoky. Yes the same man who created this damn good album is here to do vocal duties once again (which does little to distinguish the two albums). What could be the motives behind this album? There are plenty of ideas and theories from fans and critics. Most will probably point to the fact that Tomas wanted to take a jab to his former friends from Catch 22. Tomas will probably shoot that down. Some might say that the band needed some money; Tomas will flick that theory off as well. Then what were the real motives? According to Tomas Kalnoky it was simply because he “thought the sound quality on the original recording was ***” according to the interviews at the end of 1234 1234. But even after listening to the interviews, I’m still left at a crossroads whether to enjoy the album for what it is or to question its existence. Hey look on the bright side; at least they re-made a damn good album.



Recent reviews by this author
TV on the Radio Young LiarsHammock Maybe They Will Sing for Us Tomorrow
Russian Circles StationUnwound New Plastic Ideas
Helmet MeantimeStrike Anywhere Dead FM
user ratings (577)
3.8
excellent
other reviews of this album
Zesty Mordant (3.5)
...

LeMartien (3)
Why, Tomas, why?!...

danstalcup (4)
This remake is more technical but doesn't really capture the spirit of the original....



Comments:Add a Comment 
nickpcharrette
July 30th 2007


110 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

good review

i actually liked it, probably because I liked the original obviously

smokersdieyounger
July 30th 2007


672 Comments


I think a good reason for makign this album is that the original has become realy hard to find since it went out of print.

Tyler
Emeritus
July 30th 2007


7927 Comments


No.

They re-recorded it because they didnt want the label to just re-release it with a sticker on the front.

Aficionado
July 30th 2007


1027 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

They re-recorded it because they didnt want the label to just re-release it with a sticker on the front.




This is why...but I still didn't like the album. What'd ya think of the review?



Twin Human Highway Flares
July 30th 2007


36 Comments


Wouldn't it be more like Rancid redoing Energy? Anyway, good review. I agree especially with this:
"The reason is simple, mainly because both albums were just a bunch of kids having fun and both had enough energy to make up for the lack of resources."

Aficionado
July 30th 2007


1027 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

lemme fix that part to Rancid.

Two-Headed Boy
July 30th 2007


4527 Comments


Great review bud. I have Everything Goes Numb and I still have to get Catch 22's version of this, so I can't say if I'll even pick this up or not.

Aficionado
July 30th 2007


1027 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

The only reason I bought this is because I couldn't find the Catch 22 version anywhere and it seemed like a good idea at the time.



I knew you gave me a vote, your like the only one who does.

Fort23
July 30th 2007


3774 Comments


Nice review, my friend loves streetlight Manifesto, so I've bee ndrowned in this type of stuff lately and it ain't bad. I love Operation Ivy so much man.

Intransit
July 30th 2007


2797 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Frankly, the production and performance on the original Keasby Nights is so bad, I can't be bothered with it anymore. Sorry original Catch-22, but tune your instruments. I really don't see the appeal of the whole "teenagers just having a good time" thing, or even see its relevance on the original recording, but meh. I like this better than the original, but I am one of the only ones. Other than that, I felt your review really didn't have a very valid stance towards why this is a full 40% lower than the original. I mean, the only thing you attack (in various phrasings) is that it doesn't seem as youthful as the original. Somehow, I don't see how you can think it is that much worse.

Aficionado
July 30th 2007


1027 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

The fact that it was made factored into my rating aswell. I knew that you would reply to this. But hey, that's your opinion and I respect.

Intransit
July 30th 2007


2797 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I still don't understand how something being unnecessary factors into it's quality (which is what an album is supposed to be rated on).

Aficionado
July 31st 2007


1027 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

But what I feel about the album also weighs into account. Also, (as stated in my review) some of the songs came off a bit dull in translation and overral I just didn't enjoy the album. Not simply because of the fact that it was created, don't get me wrong here, but the fact that the songs end up becoming a bit boring and over-produced. Plus, if something is un-necessary you won't enjoy it, plain and simple. Hope I got the point accross.This Message Edited On 07.30.07

Aficionado
July 31st 2007


1027 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Who told you ska is popular? If you think that ska doesn't have good musicians then there must be something wrong.

SkaRobotArmy
July 31st 2007


24 Comments


i'm pretty sure i like the new version better. in fact, i lent my sister the original one so i haven't heard it in a really long time, perhaps i'll dig it out and re-compare. i just like how much smoother and bouncier everything is which i do believe is how the album was intended to be as that was tomas's next direction with streetlight.

tom79
July 31st 2007


3936 Comments


I'm sure this album is good, but I don't really plan on getting it, because, well, I'm fine enough with the original. And I find nothing wrong with the how the original one was recorded. Can't wait for new Streetlight though.

Intransit
July 31st 2007


2797 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

When I saw them play last week, they played Crash off the new album, which was sooooooooooooo sick.

PhoenixRising
August 17th 2007


277 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I think that some of these ratings are just a little whiplash reactions because of the original.



Judged on its own merits, this is pretty good.

JumpTheF**kUp
August 19th 2007


2722 Comments


I like this more than the original.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy