LMFAO just no. What the fuck was this band thinking covering a classic like that?
|
| |
Puddle of Mudd die from a massive shit injection.
That would be a better newsline.
|
| |
puddle of shit
|
| |
it can't be good when the lead single is a cover of a classic
|
| |
whoah, these dudes still exist? i'll be damned.
|
| |
Muddle of Pudd
|
| |
I thought the only people who listen to Puddle of Mudd still use AOL.
|
| |
and the crowd goes wild
|
| |
never understood covering songs for an album that's not a compilation or something.
|
| |
"Gimme Shelter" by the Rolling Stones, as made famous by Puddle of Mudd
|
| |
agreed. it's lazy. although, that's not surprising for this band.
|
| |
The Stones did a good job on this cover, but obviously the Mudd's original is a classic.
|
| |
Cover it with what? Feces?
|
| |
AOL still exists? lol
|
| |
"Cover it with what? Feces?"
lol
|
| |
and the rapture has begun
|
| |
What's next...Yellowcard covering Hotel California?
|
| |
lol what in the name of...
|
| |
limp bizkit, korn, cold, puddle of mudd, did we just travel back in time?
|
| |
you tell me, coldgobra
|
| |
you forgot Staind, coldgobra...
|
| |
jesus fucking christ that was bad.
|
| |
ummmmm no
just...just no
|
| |
I didn't even know this band still existed lol
|
| |
they should stick to covering suicidal tendencies
|
| |
they should stick to not playing music
|
| |
Is it because they couldn't write anything good themselves?
Edit: Apparantley so, considering the entire album will be covers.
Cover is awful. Agree with WashboardSuds.
|
| |
GROSS!!!!!
|
| |
lol
|
| |
these guys really know how to butcher a classic!
|
| |
Releasing an album of covers is a sign that you suck fucking dick at music. Except for btbam.
|
| |
^ very true
|
| |
