Polyethylene: Hobbit - 7.5/10

Polyethylene 12.13.12	Feared it'd be a 5, hoped it'd be a 10, got exactly halfway between the two
Surtur 12.13.12	I hate how they've dragged it out so much. Three 3 hour movies for one, not even very long book. I haven't seen it yet. I'll probably like it, but it will probably be pretty boring...
Voivod 12.13.12	I want to see "Hobbit" ASAP.
Ovrot 12.13.12	Silmarillion movies when?
Polyethylene 12.13.12	It is a very long first part, by the way Surtur the third part is mainly going to be additional stories and stuff from the appendices as far as I know. This one was pure candy overload for Tolkien enthusiasts, and I was at no point bored, but it did feel a little drawn out in bits yes
Polyethylene 12.13.12	I would love to see Silmarillion as a film (or seven), I wonder if anyone could pull that off...
Wizard 12.13.12	I can already guarantee I will hate this movie.
ViperAces 12.13.12	It got 8.9 on IMDB so I have some great expectations. Didnt like the first LOTR movie tho(the only one I saw). The books were beyond amazing.
Surtur 12.13.12	Ah additional stuff! Nice! I'm still looking forward to it nonetheless, but it still won't have a patch on the original trilogy.
blastOFFitsPARTYtime 12.13.12	Nothing happens. PJ the sellout to the days.
demigod93 12.13.12	yeah gonna see this as soon as i can.
Tyrael 12.13.12	6/10 The riddle battle battle between Bilbo and Gollum was ace
demigod93 12.13.12	gonna see this stoned as fuck so that should raise it to at least an 8
paxman 12.13.12	Seeing it this weekend, can't wait
ti0n 12.13.12	why in god's name is PJ doing 3 movies for the hobbit? I mean it's not that the book has one out of three sites of one LOTR book... FUCK WARNER AND THEIR MONEY DRIVEN MINDS.
Strider 12.13.12	8/10, lacking the immersion of the LOTR trilogy, but I did like seeing how Jackson didn't hesitate to show almost every anecdote or story
AtomicShane 12.13.12	did anybody notice the different fps?
oltnabrick 12.13.12	10/10 better than tdkr
pxl 12.13.12	48 fps+ 3D + 4k and it was amazing. You will definitely notice the difference (Fight scenes look much better as well as the 3D effect). The movie itself is a ~7/10
Atari 12.13.12	Seeing it tonight at midnight which is cool except the fact I'll have to work tomorrow on 3 hours of sleep lol
Strider 12.13.12	How could anyone not notice the 48 fps. plus it went so well with the 3D
pxl 12.13.12	@Strider: There are still people who think that the human eye can't distinguish between 24fps and 48fps in movies...
Xenophanes 12.13.12	apparently it's a three hour movie that covers the first 100 pages
Friday13th 12.13.12	I'll probably love it. The prog-rocker in me revels in long, drawn-out works of art haha. Though I did think it made no sense for the Hobbit to be three movies when the book was shorter than any of the Lord of the Rings books. Then again, I thought the extended versions of the trilogy were the only way to go.
oltnabrick 12.13.12	Did they add a Gandalf sex scene?
wabbit 12.13.12	I made weed brownies last night and the theatre I'm going that sells booze. beyond excited.
AtomicShane 12.13.12	sounds like the best way to go to a movie alone
henryChinaski 12.13.12	I bet it sucks.
Polyethylene 12.13.12	If you didn't like LOTR this probably won't appeal, if you did like LOTR (especially the extended ones) then you might just love it. Didn't see it in 48fps so no idea what that is like
sixdegrees 12.13.12	i'm a tolkien fanboy so i'll probably love it.
TheSpirit 12.13.12	Fuck everyone complaining about the it being 3 movies. They are using a lot of stuff from the appendices as well as giving backstory to events that weren't fully explained in the book. Plus, who doesn't want another year in middle-earth?
Tyrael 12.13.12	If the two other movies are better than this one then sure
andcas 12.13.12	not giving my hopes up.
Tyrael 12.13.12	abandon all hope now
wabbit 12.13.12	"who doesn't want another year in middle-earth?" A-fucking-men Starting fellowship right now (fucking work wreck plans for the whole thing) the extended scenes in the shire are so good.
Deviant. 12.13.12	"Fuck everyone complaining about the it being 3 movies. They are using a lot of stuff from the appendices as well as giving backstory to events that weren't fully explained in the book." No, what's happened is that things that are given the briefest of mentions in the book are now being extended into big half-hour long sequences in the movie
Aids 12.13.12	which is the complete opposite from what happened with the LOTR trilogy
MichaelSnoxall 12.13.12	Cannot wait to see this. I can only expect it will be wholly different from the book, but it'll still be great.
MichaelSnoxall 12.13.12	lol the LOTR movies even took scenes from The Hobbit book and put them in the films.
MisterTornado 12.13.12	Just came to see Tim Canterbury in 48 frames per second
CaptainDooRight 12.13.12	koo gonna eventually checkee
Aids 12.13.12	I expect to like the movie. However, more than any other book I've ever read, I have such strong imagery in my head associated with the scenes in the book because it was read to me as I was growing up, from quite a young age. I'm guessing that will stop me from loving the movie.
BassDemon333 12.15.12	Saw it today. For being the first of three parts, it was fantastic, and a lot of the scenes were really well done. That ending makes me really want part 2 already though.
North0House2 12.15.12	Seeing it with my girl tomorrow. Should be good.
oltnabrick 12.15.12	my girl, talkin bout my girl
Polyethylene 12.16.12	Yeah, because of how much time and energy it spent setting down the foundations of the story, I'm feeling part 2 and 3 will be absolutely phenomenal (LOTR quality). I wish they released them like a month apart though, not a year :(
Satellite 12.16.12	my only complaint is that the action got a little to cartoony at some points and made it feel like there was nothing at stake for a while. but overall i liked the film a lot. escapism entertainment at its best.
Polyethylene 12.16.12	@ Aids that's why my Dad couldn't get into the LOTR movies even, because he doesn't like watching someone else's interpretation of the book when his was so vivid.
andcas 12.16.12	heard the cgi is horribly overdone.
Satellite 12.16.12	not really any more so than any other blockbuster film. it looks like the original trilogy did.
Dunpeal 12.16.12	gotta say i saw a bunch of comments kinda shitting on this movie for "not living up to LoTR standards" and i gotta say all those ppl must be fags cuz The Hobbit is way better then LoTR IMO. It's filled with a bunch of dwarves kicking ass minus the homoerrotic undertones between frodo and samwise
Trebor17 12.16.12	I'm just obsessed with the world and the folklore and the Necromancer/Sauron and Benedict Cumberbatch doing performance capture for Smaug and Necromancer
Polyethylene 12.16.12	CGI use is on par with Return of the King. It does have a very different look to LOTR, it's shiny and has this amber glow that dominates it (firelit caverns, sunrises etc.) compared to LOTR which was all grey, brown and green I like how it has its own identity in colour, music and tone but still slides into LOTR-style moments (like Rivendell and Gollum) with total ease
Dunpeal 12.16.12	not sure who's bitching about the hobbit being made into a trilogy. i felt it was paced rather well. i was always engaged and never bored. nothing ever felt like it was taking too long. some ppl just like to bitch i guess
Polyethylene 12.16.12	Comparison with LOTR is inevitable but kinda silly, they were very different books and are already very different movies. I doubt I will get as emotionally invested in this trilogy as I did in that one (still weep like a baby at the end of ROTK), but the silliness of these movies is a nice change from all the melodrama
Polyethylene 12.16.12	Yeah despite how long and unhurried it was I was never bored once.
Dunpeal 12.16.12	that's probably where LoTR loses me. i felt the emo stuff was way way way overdone. Hobbit feels more lighthearted and fun
andcas 12.16.12	I thought sam and frodo were gonna kiss during so many scenes.
Satellite 12.16.12	emo stuff? holy fuck you're dumb.
Dunpeal 12.16.12	yeah it was pretty fagtastic most of the time. good thing the story had Aragorn to unfag things up
andcas 12.16.12	did you not see the alternate ending with gospel in the background?
Dunpeal 12.16.12	yes. emo stuff holy fuck ur gay
Dunpeal 12.16.12	alternate ending? from the extended cut? naw haven't seen the extended cut yet
andcas 12.16.12	it was a joke.
Polyethylene 12.16.12	It does get a little syrupy at times (Sam's speech about "good worth fighting for" at the end of T2T in particular) but that stuff is totally what validates the action and the runtime, without it the movies would be cold and impersonal
Polyethylene 12.16.12	So yes the "emo stuff" is what made LOTR so memorable but The Hobbit is refreshing without it
Dunpeal 12.16.12	let me clarify though. i don't mind the emotion in LoTR. it was the overly gay bond between frodo and samwise to which i am referring as "emo stuff". Aragorn displayed an affection for frodo without giving the audience the sense that he wanted to perform fellatio on his anus
ShadowRemains 12.16.12	Silmarillion movies when? [2]
Polyethylene 12.16.12	I think Frodo and Sam (even in the book) were shown to be at the very height of friendship, as in they couldn't be any closer without it being romantic. Watch Thelma and Louise for another example of this
Ovrot 12.16.12	saw it was pretty good looking forward to the next ones
DeadBeat 12.16.12	I was disappointed because I like lotr a lot an this was just ok
derho 12.16.12	it was like a video game. So silly and over the top. Lotr was way better
wabbit 12.16.12	Best movie ever
Calc 12.16.12	awesome movie next ones should be sweetness
Polyethylene 12.17.12	Really keen to see it in 48fps, some people hated it (video game comparison) whereas some say it's amazing...
Strider 12.17.12	it's impressive. takes a while to get used too, but it's a real treat when you do
MisterTornado 12.17.12	stone fight was ace
Strider 12.17.12	I almost forgot about the giants, great scene
conesmoke 12.17.12	trailer makes it look a little bit regurgitated from lotr tbh.
Dunpeal 12.18.12	i don't get the complaint about battles being "cartoonish" or "over the top." Do we want a dwarf dying/injured every battle so we can hinder the pacing with a teary eye moment? it's the first part of a trilogy FFS. leave the kleenex time for the next one or last one
Funeralopolis 12.18.12	seems ,like everyone is giving this a 7.5
Polyethylene 12.18.12	You have to have quite kinetic and fast-paced action if you're juggling a group of fifteen characters all fighting... you get some lovely wide shots of all of them in a group but also a few where it shoots from dwarf to dwarf at a high speed, that might be "overwhelming" for some. Solid 7.5, next two will surely be 9s or higher
NightProwler 12.18.12	Just a 7 from me. And that's being generous. Hope the next two following movies will kick ass.
wabbit 12.18.12	I found it really feels like the hobbit, in the same way that the lotr felt like the books.
Polyethylene 12.29.12	Habit or a rib
ViperAces 12.30.12	yea movie rocks
Keyblade 12.30.12	yeah it ruled. visually it was superb. and i don't care how much they stretch the story as long as it's still this engaging and gorgeous. seriously, that orc ambush scene had me on the edge of my seat.
sixdegrees 12.30.12	it's pretty awesome, I can't wait for the rest of the trilogy.
wabbit 12.30.12	for his shooting style and types of movies he makes Jackson is such a good character director.
TMobotron 12.30.12	"CGI use is on par with Return of the King. It does have a very different look to LOTR, it's shiny and has this amber glow that dominates it (firelit caverns, sunrises etc.) compared to LOTR which was all grey, brown and green I like how it has its own identity in colour, music and tone but still slides into LOTR-style moments (like Rivendell and Gollum) with total ease" I really agree with this. I also thought it had a much lighter even somewhat silly style, but I thought that fit the tone of the book pretty well (though it was a little TOO silly at a couple points). It definitely wasn't as good as the original trilogy, not that I was expecting it to be, but it's a fucking awesome movie.
andcas 12.30.12	movie was disappointing and unnecessary.
ViperAces 12.30.12	so was your birth
andcas 12.30.12	I wasn't born.
demigod93 12.30.12	still gotta see this. my friend says its the best movie he's ever seen. I dont believe him though
lucasjcockcroft 12.30.12	it was boring I don't get the draw of watching a 3 hour long movie that doesn't advance a story anywhere then again I hated the LOTR movies.
andcas 12.30.12	"my friend says its the best movie he's ever seen" tell your friend he's a retard.
ViperAces 12.30.12	6.5/10 or 7/10 for me the books are far better but this might be better than the first lotr imho
demigod93 12.30.12	Oh I do andcas
MiniatureHorse 12.30.12	The Hobbit was pretty decent. Not as great as the other LOTR movies, but yeah.
Polyethylene 12.30.12	The general consensus, it would seem
Douglas 12.30.12	getting the shit about the necromancer and the white council was pretty cool, and hopefully they expand those stories in the next couple of flicks. the more middle earth the better
Deviant. 12.30.12	"for his shooting style and types of movies he makes Jackson is such a good character director. " Have you seen Meet The Feebles?
Polyethylene 12.30.12	Yeah, the Hobbit material was almost doubled by all of Tolkien's appendices, explaining two pages where Gandalf was absent with fifty pages of story. I think the end result is going to be pretty sick.