">
 

Lars Frederiksen and the Bastards
Lars Frederiksen And The Bastards


3.5
great

Review

by Rudd13 USER (61 Reviews)
November 6th, 2005 | 15 replies


Release Date: 2001 | Tracklist


Lars Frederiksen And The Bastards- S/T

What are side projects, exactly? In musical terms, some people may think that if there’s a spinoff, or side project of a band, it is immediately an insult to the original group. While this might be the case at times, a musician lives through his or her work, and inspirations take them farther to different places, that sometimes, don’t fit with others, or the original band, in this case. Lars Frederiksen And The Bastards is a spinoff, or side project belonging to the guitarist/vocalist of punk band, Rancid. After the band finished touring their headlined Indestructible tour, Frederiksen and Tim Armstrong (solo Producer) went into a recording studio in northern California to begin recording the Bastards’ first album. The self-titled record is the beginning to many new musicians that were picked up by Lars himself, and most of them trace back from Lars’ earlier years. When I heard about this project, my reaction was, “this is great, because by listening to this record, we’ll find out exactly what the man behind the multi-colored Mohawk can do on his own.” Surely, I took a listen and I was in for plenty of surprises, and some disappointments that still tend to stick out.

The whole album is written by Lars. The lyrics, and the composition. To interrupt very quickly, let me remind you that although he has over-decent musicians along with him, that is still quite a weigh on a single man’s shoulders, and to fully succeed, you need to hit it in the right spot and have everything arranged perfectly. Now, this didn’t exactly “hit” perfectly on the right spot, but at times it seems like its getting there fairly quick, and at times it seems like there’s plenty of things holding it back. Lars specializes in guitar-work, not lyrics. Keeping this in mind, I will say that the guitar-work is well over-decent and blends with the rest of the music very nicely and acts as the center of everything in about 90% of the album’s entirety. Songs are all mostly built the same, and seem like they would make a nice spot as filler on a Rancid album. But it’s peculiar how some people see filler differently and how when it is blended together in a set of thirteen tracks, it groups and works up to be a little more than you’d expect.

Now, don’t be hasty. Not all tracks are like this. The album single, Skunx, provides a great outlook of the band, and at the end it’s formed out very nicely. The track shares an aspect many of the others share, and that is that every instrument gets a turn, and they all stand out in a part of the song, wether it’s a breakdown, an ascending bridge, or a counterpart that calls for way too many rolls. The song isn’t anywhere near perfect, but it is still worth checking out and is one of the recommended on the album. As far as composition goes on the rest of the album, it is that you’d see from an undeveloped garage band. Basically, some things that stick out and catch your ear, and a lot of others that will make you think if more time listening to this is worth it. As my favorite section to look out for is the rhythmic section, I was pleased to find out that drums on here are set to a much faster potential than those of Reed’s on Rancid, and a lot of other punk for that matter. Bass falls in at very boring at times, with simple lines that shows at bridges often, and slows down the mix. The guitar, as said before is a big part, and almost the only part of the album, and Lars, taking the lead at vocals and guitar, shows it off very nicely. Solos are hurled throughout the record, and it’s something positive to wait on when you start up another track.

Vocals for me are praised. But I warn you, that’s just me. I have admired Lars’ vocals ever since listening to Wolves by Rancid, and it is a huge part of the album for me. It makes it harsh, and more entertaining than if it was being led by some other guy with confusing hair. Lars cracks out a few serious parts, one being To Have And To Have Not, the score dedicated to the late Joe Strummer. This one shows off his ability to an even farther extent and is another of the recommended. Overall, vocals range from brilliant lead parts by Lars, to boring background vocals that always attempt to keep up with the lead way too often and makes it sound uninteresting and gives no feeling of surprise of adrenaline.

What did we learn, class? That on his own, Lars can accomplish a lot, although not brilliant work that will surprise many listeners as well as disappoint. It’s just the way you look at it, but this I’d say is a good enough view to the album so you can judge for yourself. Lars is much better off in Rancid, but this has some twists that would appear as awkward and just stupid on a Rancid record.

Stand Out Tracks:
Dead American
To Have And Have Not
Army Of Zombies
Anti Social
Skunx

Great.

3.5/5



Recent reviews by this author
Roger Miret and the Disasters My RiotStreet Dogs Back To The World
Flogging Molly Whiskey On A SundayMad Sin Survival Of The Sickest
The Tossers The Valley Of The Shadow Of DeathThe Unseen State Of Discontent
user ratings (61)
3.5
great


Comments:Add a Comment 
masada
November 7th 2005


2733 Comments


Good review as always, sir.

/despises Operation Ivy and Rancid

Zebra
Moderator
November 7th 2005


2647 Comments


Very good review, your reviews are always detailed to the max.

I can't stand Lars Frederickson, IMO he really screwed up Rancid. Once he joined the band they instantly went from a great punk or pop/punk band to trash.



Rudd13
November 7th 2005


952 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

[quote=Zebra] I can't stand Lars Frederickson[/quote]



Haha, I bet theresw not one person that can spell his name on the site. Actually, I sometimes have trouble with it myself. Step up, challengers, but without looking up!



Thanks for that, guys. This one didnt get a lot of feedback.

PuNk-O-RaMa
November 7th 2005


18 Comments


Lars Frederiksen. haha!! anyways, i dunno wheteher this would be a worthy purchase or not. is Viking (2nd album) better?

Rudd13
November 7th 2005


952 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

[quote=Punk-O-Rama]i dunno wheteher this would be a worthy purchase or not. is Viking (2nd album) better?[/quote]



The second is not that different from this one, but like I said, if youre a fan of Lars' other work, download the stand outs of the album that are listed at the bottom of the review there. Like those, and you can then go on and buy the album. It's not expensive either. It sells for about 8 or 9 bucks. I'd say Viking is just as good as this, if not a little better, and holds the best song in my opinion by the band. It's called 1%. I'd give Viking also a high 3, maybe 3.5 out of 5.This Message Edited On 11.07.05

Pint of stella
March 23rd 2006


57 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Great punk album, much better then Viking.

MyRamona
March 27th 2006


1098 Comments


I've heard the single, to have and to have not - It's a great punk song. I try and buy this soon. Good review.

georgesblink182@yahoo.com
May 26th 2006


49 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

someone add their new cd, VIKING, it is so cool.

smokersdieyounger
May 16th 2007


672 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

The covers are the best songs on this record

pogostick1
May 30th 2007


42 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

i like this review, i think its fair, some points of it are great, but then you see the otherside too. Dead American though, is fantastic.



I reviewed the 2nd Cd he put out for your delectation (or dismay, whatever).



samheaton85
August 31st 2008


2 Comments


Below is possibly the dumbest statement I have heard in a long time:

"I can't stand Lars Frederickson, IMO he really screwed up Rancid. Once he joined the band they instantly went from a great punk or pop/punk band to trash."

Zebra, I'm actually hoping that you are joking because that statement hurts my brain. So to clarrify this, your saying that Rancid were a great band only for their debut album in 93?

Its a good album but its fast and simple and unrefined, and its highlight probably "Rats in the Hallway." At this point the band that has only been around for a year and is great.

So it is here that Lars Frederickson joins, and apparently "really screws up Rancid" and they become "trash."

He adds the now distinctive sound of a Rancid slide guitar section and adds to the interchaning of vocals to contrast and harmonise each other. Their next 5 albums which really make up their whole catalogue are trash and they are screwed up. Classic songs that follow like "Radio" "Salvation" "Ruby Soho" " "Timebomb" in the proceeding years and albums that are a definitive of a generation of punk kids in the 90's like"And out come the Wolves" are trash???

Your right on the money there mate, very knowledgeable statement.

I actually don't really post on forums, but I have created an account just to post this, because sometimes people really need to be alerted to how fucking stupid they are, and it looks like you're a moderator, so if your offended ban me or some shit, but for fuck's sake learn to think before you open your mouth.



Meatplow
August 31st 2008


5523 Comments


lol @ rant

zebra you dilettante you

Serpento
August 31st 2008


2351 Comments


yeah how dare you give your opinion

don't you know the phrase imo stands for "eat me"


KieranTVogel
August 31st 2008


19 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Rancid rules. So does Lars.

Spec
November 30th 2023


39371 Comments


Sam’s rant up there is hilarious (albeit correct).



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy